She lied about the year of her thereapy and two front doors!!
Her whole testimony is a lie.
The Fords didn’t go to just a marriage counselor. Mr. Ford reported it was a psychotherapist. What a coincidence that there is a marriage psychotherapist living in their home - https://www.healthgrades.com/providers/sylvia-randall-y7yqq . Is widdle Crissy so messed up she needs a live-in psychotherapist?
I’m thinking, if she’s not just a hateful lib pussy hat wearing demonrat, but a truly troubled person that she has split personalities and we met cute widdle precocious 3 year old “pretty posing” Chrissy at the hearing. There is no way over decades of teaching college students they haven’t eaten up widdle “pretty posing” Professor Chrissy.
Adding to that theory is how she wrote the statement at the polygraph. That was not written by a 50-something year old grown adult college educated woman. It looked for all the world like chicken scratches and scribble outs by a 12 year old boy (personality #3). The signature was wrong, too. She goes by Christine or Chrissy but not “Christy”. The last name had the “e” completely left out of the last name. The other letters in the last name were legible and there was no swiggle or any indication there was a letter where the “e” should be. Sure, we all sign our names more sloppy as the years pass but that’s out of laziness. We do not write each letter but suddenly forget about one of those letters. We also sign important potentially legal papers with our full names and we make sure it isn’t lazy so it holds up. That signature wouldn’t pass a grade school six weeks test.
I don’t see the error. The photo is from 2012 and shows two doors. Her notes say that they “had completed...a building project.” At the time of her therapy session, the building had already finished at some time in the past.
Now, her lying about being a psychologist is something to ding her for.
Charge the lying bitch!
I am so sick, of people saying how credible she was.
Judge Jeanine, Sean Hannity, President Donald knock it off.
She was obviously lying about everything, and that pitiful, little innocent mouse voice was the dead give away.
She doesn’t speak that way.
Ford’s Testimony was compiled from tons of Teen Movies
Is she really a psychologist as defined by the state of California and other states?
She never says in her testimony WHEN the 2nd door was put in. This is all hyperventilating. She has a ton of inconsistencies to be sure. But to reach for this as though it’s some kind of smoking gun is just plain deranged. As deranged as any outrageous claims the left makes. It never shocks me how many narcissists both sides have. It’s clear this author wants some kind of recognition as having been “THE” one who kicked some sort of door down into a massive fraud, and we should all be grateful. Sheesh.
Democrats are never held accountable for slandering for political destruction. Reid’s takedown of Romney with the tax scandal, and openly admitting it after, is one example. A party centered on lies, if they can lie about a political opponent and not be held accountable, will certainly lie to destroy an opponent. What’s more troubling though, are voters who will be swayed by those tactics. The democrat party’s positions are not attractive enough to get a majority vote, but smearing the other side will tip it to their favor.
It was credible or convincing. I’m a woman and I thought was either contrived or hallucination.
Ford says she bumped into Judge at Safeway, but there were no Safeways in that area in 1982. Was this claim in her psych counseling notes? Because if Judge wrote that he worked at Safeway in his 2005 book (he changed any names), then Ford concocted story from reading Judge’s book
It was debunked the minute her “witnesses” said it never happened.
We need to see the theripist’s notes. We are told Christine had therapy to uncover memory affected by repressed memory syndrome. First of all, such therapy is long discredited method of memory recovery therapy. If Christine is a psychologist, she should know this.
Second, do the therapist’s notes contain the names of those present in the house of the so-called sexual assault? I am talking about Mark Judge, P.J. Smyth, and Leland Ingham. If these names are not in the notes, then it was not memory recovery from counseling that brought them up. My question is, who or what brought up those names?
My theory is that Christine found out the close friends of Kavanaugh and fabricated the story around those names.
Finally, Christine described how she was on her way to go to the bathroom and got pushed into the bedroom. Anyone who had to go to the bathroom who is pushed into a bedroom, forced onto a bed, the shock of being jumped on and the weight of both men on top of her would have been enough for anyone to soil themselves. No such event was described. The mess of that event would have stopped the attack and it would have been memorable.
Final inspect of construction is indicated as February of 2010.
The psychology of women using child-talk.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/speak-easy/201708/why-some-grown-women-sound-girls
Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell: “Have you ever given tips or advice to somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test?”
This is interesting! Mitchell setting up Ford for perjury? I would say so!
https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1046210923994730496
Almost convincing? In what alternate universe was that silly little girl act in any way convincing?
Evidence in a Senate Hearing?
Is that even legal?