Posted on 09/30/2018 7:11:58 AM PDT by McQ444
After Christine Blasey Ford gave an almost convincing testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week, major plot holes have begun to surface in the statement she gave under oath.
(Excerpt) Read more at nnettle.com ...
It functions as an entrance to a rental area.
Could Doctor Ford be using that woman’s license as a cover to practice? She could always claim she’s the Randall woman’s assistant if questioned. Much like the change on the college’s website.
Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell: “Have you ever given tips or advice to somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test?”
This is interesting! Mitchell setting up Ford for perjury? I would say so!
https://twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1046210923994730496
Excellent point.
For psychological consistency, you would think there would also be a second door there. Her anxiety is supposedly related to being confined in a home, so that would be ALL HOMES. If she was being honest and consistent.
The fact that the second home lacks a second door raises serious questions about her credibility.
Every woman I know is FOR KAVANAUGH! Real women do not swallow the garbage fed out by the Democrats and the Media in an effort to stop Trump.
Adding to the list:
Door lie #5 - no second front door at second home.
How many escape routes out of her college office?
How many escape routes out of her college office?
*************
What about her stays at hotels or B&B’s on her frequent travels? Does she insist on being near an exit?
ah thanks,
Almost convincing? In what alternate universe was that silly little girl act in any way convincing?
Evidence in a Senate Hearing?
Is that even legal?
Exactly. Gee I saw Juanita Broderick on tv, no crying little girl voice. Violent rape victim.
She Lord about her fear of flying. How does she not know whose house with only 6 teenagers and no parents? If 40 teenagers maybe but 6 she would know.
“According to the building permit, the Fords removed a home office attached to the garage, expanded the garage and added a master bedroom onto the front, with its own front door. The new bedroom’s front door opens onto the street, perpendicular to an adjacent front door on the great room.
They now rent out the master bedroom with a private door to Google interns, Ford testified.
The floor plan is dated Nov. 29, 2007, and received a plan check approval from the city on Jan. 28, 2008. Other documents were submitted for the renovation on Feb. 4, 2008.”
_________________________________________________________
None of this matters a whit. She said they had “recently” completed a renovation. She gave no date to impeach her testimony. Since she didn’t say the year or date it was completed, it’s not perjury. Get a grip.
I’ve been wondering how she knew the names of Brett’s friends in high school. Judge Kavanaugh said they were not in the same social circle but wouldn’t rule out possibly having met her. Did she have a friend who was friends with Kavanaugh? It might be possible to extract the information from high school yearbooks, but maybe not—and where would she have found the yearbooks (unless they have been put online)?
Exactly!
There is no record of a 2012 building permit (for the remodeling) but there is one dated 2008. Which conveniently situates it between the 2007 no-door picture and the 2011 with-door pictures.
Any notes can be dated using forensic methods. It is the time that these notes were made that makes them authentic instead of fabricated.
Good point. And not many patients are going tome forward and expose her cause then their issues might come out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.