Posted on 09/30/2018 7:11:58 AM PDT by McQ444
After Christine Blasey Ford gave an almost convincing testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week, major plot holes have begun to surface in the statement she gave under oath.
(Excerpt) Read more at nnettle.com ...
Democrats are never held accountable for slandering for political destruction. Reid’s takedown of Romney with the tax scandal, and openly admitting it after, is one example. A party centered on lies, if they can lie about a political opponent and not be held accountable, will certainly lie to destroy an opponent. What’s more troubling though, are voters who will be swayed by those tactics. The democrat party’s positions are not attractive enough to get a majority vote, but smearing the other side will tip it to their favor.
Take a look at this twitter thread. If you scroll down, you can see the picture from the polygraph.
The testimony should be watched too.
https://mobile.twitter.com/RealSaavedra/status/1046210923994730496
According to the building permit, the Fords removed a home office attached to the garage, expanded the garage and added a master bedroom onto the front, with its own front door. The new bedroom’s front door opens onto the street, perpendicular to an adjacent front door on the great room.
They now rent out the master bedroom with a private door to Google interns, Ford testified.
The floor plan is dated Nov. 29, 2007, and received a plan check approval from the city on Jan. 28, 2008. Other documents were submitted for the renovation on Feb. 4, 2008.
It was credible or convincing. I’m a woman and I thought was either contrived or hallucination.
Anyone who thinks she was credible does not know how to spot a liar. So many gullible people. Of course that’s how obozo the hug eared assclown got elected twice. Not mention the always lying Clintoon.
Ford says she bumped into Judge at Safeway, but there were no Safeways in that area in 1982. Was this claim in her psych counseling notes? Because if Judge wrote that he worked at Safeway in his 2005 book (he changed any names), then Ford concocted story from reading Judge’s book
It was debunked the minute her “witnesses” said it never happened.
We need to see the theripist’s notes. We are told Christine had therapy to uncover memory affected by repressed memory syndrome. First of all, such therapy is long discredited method of memory recovery therapy. If Christine is a psychologist, she should know this.
Second, do the therapist’s notes contain the names of those present in the house of the so-called sexual assault? I am talking about Mark Judge, P.J. Smyth, and Leland Ingham. If these names are not in the notes, then it was not memory recovery from counseling that brought them up. My question is, who or what brought up those names?
My theory is that Christine found out the close friends of Kavanaugh and fabricated the story around those names.
Finally, Christine described how she was on her way to go to the bathroom and got pushed into the bedroom. Anyone who had to go to the bathroom who is pushed into a bedroom, forced onto a bed, the shock of being jumped on and the weight of both men on top of her would have been enough for anyone to soil themselves. No such event was described. The mess of that event would have stopped the attack and it would have been memorable.
The point is the whole story is BS.
She got busted housing google interns and probably had to get a second door to house them legally. You’re probably right about the inside being separated.
For a professor with a Phd, she sure lives in a crappy little house. I bet a lot of this is a case of jealousy. She referred to Georgetown as elitist.
She’s mad that she screwed 50-60 guys, maybe more in the long term, and they all succeeded in life while she failed.
I imagine the dems pulled the whole delay due to fear of flying so they had time to convince her that her not doing well like all the boys and men she screwed is the fault of those boys/men and not her fault.
They turned her into a victim as is their specialty.
1.She doesn’t remember the House because it was in a different neighborhood, one where Bret Kavanaugh would never be connected to, but she and her family would be familiar with. Check out the Burning Tree Club and neighborhood in the 1980’s.Lots of Parties there back in the day. And close to the Blasey home and her school = her friends.
Are you certain about that?
During her testimony Dr. Ford referred to herself as a research psychologist.
The state of California has very specific prohibitions regarding use of the term “psychologist”. The California BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE, SECTION 2900-2919 clearly states that professors and other academicians can perform psychological activities but they cannot refer to themselves as a “psychologist” (or other closely related terms) if they are not licensed as such.
If you can document an exception (in California since that’s where she lives and works) please do so.
Not sure how other states regulate or view this matter.
I do not believe the woman in that one photo we saw taking a supposed polygraph was Ford.
“The point is, in therapy, Ford referred to a previously completed reno job involving two front doors.”
Exactly. Why would she be stressed out in 2012 therapy about a 2nd door installation project that was already completed years prior?
Who cares why she brought it up in therapy? If this is the strongest challenge you can mount to Ford’s testimony, then Kavanaugh is screwed.
No that was another lie. She is not a psychologist as defined in California her state of residence or any other state. It is against the law in California to claim to be a psychologist without having passed certification. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for California officials to call her on it.
I dont think so. They can strip the hair of color and then put new color on. Her hair though messy looked healthy. Probably extentions.
Please see my related comment #52.
That crappy little house costs a fortune CA
According,to what I heard the book was fictional
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.