Q Anon: 09/30/18 Trust Trump's Plan

To: 1_Rain_Drop; Steven W.

Crikey! And Steven even posted to me....

I feel stupid. Thanks, FReeQs.

2,321 posted on 10/03/2018 10:56:11 AM PDT by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)

2,322 posted on 10/03/2018 11:05:02 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44

Doesn’t she own another house, not the horrid house that she lied about, but another, nice home on the water? I think her beach friends live there.

2,323 posted on 10/03/2018 11:06:51 AM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)

2,324 posted on 10/03/2018 11:06:54 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44

Not sure, but I think he did red, white, blue on July 4th or something like that.

Since Trump actions NEVER get media coverage unless they can say something negative, it’s hard to tell. I don’t remember any others.

2,325 posted on 10/03/2018 11:17:46 AM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)

To: numberonepal

Mmmm. Double meanings?

Looks red to me!! But I’ll defer to your research.

2,326 posted on 10/03/2018 11:19:13 AM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)

Just got the Presidential alert on my phone!

2,327 posted on 10/03/2018 11:19:43 AM PDT by StormFlag (May the Light shine and darkness remove, MAGA)

2,328 posted on 10/03/2018 11:20:03 AM PDT by Axenolith (WWG1WGA!)

I just got mine at 1:17 Central.

2,329 posted on 10/03/2018 11:20:54 AM PDT by ichabod1 (He's a vindictive SOB but he's *our* vindictive SOB.)

LucyT wrote:

“Twitter

BREAKING!
Dr. FORD CAUGHT LYING TO SENATE HEARING!
SENATOR GRASSLEY IS OUTRAGED!
Demands Ford Respond .... Developing .......”

Great find!!

Need link !!!

2,330 posted on 10/03/2018 11:21:28 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)

One of the things FBI agents are trained to do is lie.
~~~~

I guess we can all agree that Stryozk would get an A+ on that training..

2,331 posted on 10/03/2018 11:22:19 AM PDT by StormFlag (May the Light shine and darkness remove, MAGA)

To: bitt; Steven W.

Interesting that the 17 women came forward on the 17th of September...Are they trying to play to Q crowd?

2,332 posted on 10/03/2018 11:35:24 AM PDT by smileyface (Things looking up in RED PA! I love President Trump!)

To: TheTexasMom; All

Lol! That would be a lot if us. Best president ever. We need a Congress to match. MAGA. WWG1WGA.

BTW - just got another Presidential Alert test on my phone. 1:33 CDT. First was at 1:18.

2,333 posted on 10/03/2018 11:36:12 AM PDT by TrueFact (Critical thinking about EVERYTHING.... tough but required.)

To: WildHighlander57

***

https://twitter.com/PPSIMMONS

BREAKING!
Dr. FORD CAUGHT LYING TO SENATE HEARING!
SENATOR GRASSLEY IS OUTRAGED!
Demands Ford Respond .... Developing .......”

2,334 posted on 10/03/2018 11:39:43 AM PDT by LucyT

To: little jeremiah

I will tell you my understanding, but I have not researched the issue in the kind of depth that I would for a legal memo by any means. I have followed the issue over the years and recently reread the Hamdi decision to refresh my memory when there was some confusion in some earlier discussions on the Q threads.

Our military engages against our enemies. When they engage and capture the other side’s military, there is law that governs how we treat those people. Mostly, they are treated under the Geneva Convention, which is a treaty signed by most of the world’s nations. We generally follow it, even as to non-signatories, as when we were at war with North Vietnam. They did not follow it as to our prisoners. Neither did North Korea or China in the Korean War. We don’t have to follow it, but we do.

The laws of war are many, but they include things not fighting amid civilians, not executing prisioners, not attacking civilians, not raping, things like that. When our military encounters those who are connected to a military enemy but committing those offenses, the military may try those people for those offenses, in a tribunal. Those are not civilian offenses.

There is another body of law that relates to unlawful combatants. Unlawful combatanta are those who are not wearing a uniform, and who are battling the US in unconvential ways. In time of war, it could be a spy sneaking behind enemy lines. Or it could be a unit that is fighting conventionally, but not wearing uniforms, so as to not be identifiable. Either way, the Geneva Convention does not apply to those people. They can be executed, pretty summarily. Not sure what procedure we have in the field, but unlawful combatant has no legal protection. Viet Cong were unlawful combatants. No uniforms, hiding among the population. We treated them too nicely, maybe because they had our guys. But we didn’t have to.

In the civil war, there were southern spies captured in the North, and there were cases to decide if they could be tried by military tribunal or in civil court. The military could try them, as I recall, but there were some cases where the court said they had to be tried in a civil court. I didn’t go back and read those. As best I can recall, it was a mixed bag.

In WW2, a sub dropped off 4 Germans in South Carolina and they were supposed to go around and commit sabotage. They were all captured. One of them was born in the US to German parents and was technically American, just like Hamdi was. The court decided that he was an unlawful combatant fighting for an enemy of the US and the military could try him as a combatant, he didn’t have to be charged with a crime in civilian court. He was tried and executed within about a month or two of his capture. Things worked better back then.

Hamdi was an American born Muslim captured overseas fighting against the US on the field of battle. He claimed as an American, he was entitled to be tried in a civilian court, not by the military. A court plurality of 4 justices found that his claim of not being an unlawful combatant had to be tried before he could be subject to military justice. It could be done in a military court, if there was sufficient due process, or a civilian court, but it had to be first. Then, if it turned out he was an unlawful combatant, he could be tried by the military and treated as their rules allow.

We declared war against radical islamic terror a few days after 9/11. That war is still ongoing. Members of islamic terror groups in the US who are caught could and should be considered unlawful combatants under existing law. If they are US citizens, they are entitled to a hearing to determine if they are an unlawful combatant. It could be in a military or civilian court. At that hearing, the issues would be whether they are a member of a group with which the US is at war and if they have taken actions that make them a “combatant”. Being a Nazi didn’t make on a combatant in WW2. Taking part in war against the US did. So, the kind of actions that might make one a combatant would be examined. Is MB membership enough? Or do you have to be part of a plot to do something? If so, what kind of plot? To register muslims? Or does it have to involve violence? These are things that would have to be fleshed out.

Now, you arrive at the idea floated by many here that traitors who are acting on behalf of Hillary Clinton or George Soros or Obama to help make America a socialist authoritarian state should be tried by a military tribunal. That would take the law as it has been used against American citizens to a new place that has not been tried before. Treason is a civil offense. It always involves citizens and actions to hurt the country, and usually on behalf of a foreign entity. The people we are talking about may not be acting on behalf of a foreign enemy, they may all be domestic enemies who are against the Constitution. How military tribunals fit into such allegations is unclear to me. Seems more likely they would be civilian treason matters.

Some of the conspiracies may involve foreign entities, like the UK or Russia in U1, or aid to Syrian terrorists, or help China with technology and spying. Whether working with foreign actors with whom we are not at war will allow for military tribunals is also not clear. I think it would be an extension of existing law, it would not fit under existing law. From what I know, we are dealing with people who do not mind being bribed by foreigners, who don’t mind helping them, who don’t mind working against the interests of the US, but who are very much acting as domestic enemies of the US, not specifically as agents of any foreign country. They want to take over the country, they don’t want China or Russia to do it. So how military tribunals fit in to that, I don’t know. I think they may well not.

Hope that helps.

2,335 posted on 10/03/2018 11:44:23 AM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)

To: BlessedBeGod

That's awesome! When you changed "Rice" to "Ricin," you got the font, color -- everything -- absolutely perfect!

Why thank yuh, thank yuh veruh much.

2,336 posted on 10/03/2018 11:54:26 AM PDT by numberonepal (WWG1WGA)

To: Disestablishmentarian

The opposition is surely coming from the entrenched leadership at the top of the AF pyramid rank structure. A Space Command would blow up the career space/time continuum of the AF rank structure above the rank of captain as well as moving the location and number of Colonel and General officer positions around perhaps leading to the promotion of nontypical candidates.

Earthquakes and climate change!

2,337 posted on 10/03/2018 12:04:47 PM PDT by Billyv ( Ephesians 6:11 for we battle not against flesh and blood...Pray for our leaders and nation!)

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

The Reddit logo tells me they are very confident; they are convinced we are too stupid to see it even when it’s right in front of our faces. They loathe and disdain us. I interpret the Latin as “Remember, human, [you are nothing to us]. We are nothing more than dumb product to them.

2,338 posted on 10/03/2018 12:05:17 PM PDT by Melian (Patriots fight!)

***

https://twitter.com/PPSIMMONS

BREAKING!
Dr. FORD CAUGHT LYING TO SENATE HEARING!
SENATOR GRASSLEY IS OUTRAGED!
Demands Ford Respond .... Developing .......”

2,339 posted on 10/03/2018 12:17:59 PM PDT by LucyT

so, it sux to be falsley accused ? who knew ?

2,340 posted on 10/03/2018 12:24:35 PM PDT by stylin19a ( Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794