Hopefully this will be roundly and soberly ignored while the process of confirmation continues.
Next up; a replacement for Skeletor.
Posted on 09/16/2018 12:06:55 PM PDT by Lazamataz
The woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault came forward with her explosive allegations on Sunday, saying the supposed attack "derailed me substantially for four or five years" and claiming that the episode rendered her "unable to have healthy relationships with men."
The woman, Christine Ford, is a professor at Palo Alto University, according to The Washington Post, which published her account on Sunday. Her decision to go public caps a whirlwhind week that began when Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., sent shockwaves through Washington by releasing a statement saying she turned over information about Kavanaugh from an anonymous accuser to the FBI.
Ford, a 51-year-old registered Democrat who has published in academic journals and trains students in clinical psychology, described the alleged incident on Sunday, saying it occurred at a Maryland house gathering. Ford claimed she headed upstairs to a bathroom when she was suddenly pushed onto a bed, as rock-and-roll music blared.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
That's the trap you are falling into. You are predicating your defense on the claim that party never happened - the whole thing being a lie. But right now, the media is asking every single person who went to that school about this party. If you find one of the other two people, and they can confirm that the party happened, then Kavanaugh is dead. Even though that party happening doesn't mean anything bad happened at the party.
Socialist activist, no surprise.
Polygraph her stipulating that she will have to name her attcker. If she refuses, vote!
Polygraph her stipulating that she will have to name her attcker. If she refuses, vote!
Women never lie about rape attempts. Especially hardcore Dems trying to save abortion.
lol
will this be the death of the metoo politics of destruction?
we already had corporate politics using accusation to secure promotion over competition.
Incorrect. I am noting that the therapist notes stipulate 4 boys involved, but she explained that away by claiming she said only 4 boys AT THE WHOLE PARTY... and 2 in the bedroom.
I am suggesting it is unreasonable to think a big party has only 4 boys, thus, her statement now is in direct conflict with her statement then.
THAT is my point.
Maybe they called her Choo Choo or Vaseline Christine in High School"
That's a low class, pathetic comment that helps the democrats. Don't be that guy.
My bet is Murkowski, Collins, Flake will bail by tomorrow.
Where did she say it was a big party? According to the WaPo, they already have names on the two other boys are trying to get a comment from them.
Maybe Collins and Mukiwski’s bluff needs to be called and let all he’ll break loose.
So if it can be shown there were more than 4 boys, she will have shown to be lying.
I noticed that too.
It sounds like she told two stories that conflicted and tried to smooth over the differences later.
But I don't believe she's on record as saying there were only four boys at the party, just that those four boys were the one's she knew were at the party.
Hopefully this will be roundly and soberly ignored while the process of confirmation continues.
Next up; a replacement for Skeletor.
You are EXACTLY right. This same tactic is used over and over and over again. EVERYONE involved in this false accusation must be purged, from the accuser to Feinstein to media. This is REAL collusion.
She looks like a hottie in her HS year book.
Two “other” boys? Judge the writer was one - who is the other? And has he been interviewed?
Here’s how you pass a lie detector test.
There’s A Guaranteed Way To Beat A Lie Detector Using Just Your Anus
By : Josh Teal
0 Shares
We’ve all seen lie detector tests on Jeremy Kyle but few of us have actually undergone one.
But have you ever thought about taking one, or more importantly, if you had to take one how you’d want to get around it?
If you’re a guilty sociopath with a strong desire to get off scot-free in any given situation, the answer is probably yes.
Pixabay
So how would you do it? Fail the test but demonstrate exemplary lying skills to convince prosecutors? Nope. You’d use your arse.
Doug Williams, who joined the Oklahoma police force in 1972, went to polygraph school and became an expert in lie detector tests.
However, as the years went on he rejected the tests as largely ineffective. This may have something to do with the fact nerves can make an innocent suspect show guilty results.
He told radio show This American Life:
I began to doubt the tests after a while, I knew I could control my breathing but I didn’t know for sure how to control the cardio and the blood pressure.
It wasn’t until my friend came in and started talking about the pucker factor and tightening up the anal sphincter muscle when he was under stress.
Yep. Clenching your anus is the go-to for all you liars out there.
Williams added:
After he left, I just hooked myself up to the polygraph test… and tightened up my anal sphincter muscle like I was trying to stop my bowel movements and low and behold there was the most gigantic, wonderful, naturally occurring cardio rise, accompanying a GSR rise.
Unluckily for Williams, he was prosecuted for obstruction of justice and mail fraud for releasing this info.
That doesn’t change anything, though, ’cause everyone now knows what they’re gonna do if they end up being berated by a scorned family member or partner on ITV daytime television. Clench the arse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.