Q Anon: 09/09/18 Trust Trump's Plan

I’ve always had Texokie’s tendencies toward rabbit holes, though she does them way better. When Watergate happened, I read EVERYTHING, watched every day of the hearings, bought every book on the topic and yelled at the TV when one of the congressmen got a detail wrong. Still have the books. That was my big bunny hole before my Oliver North fixation.

It grinds my teeth to see Republicans offer Nixon up to the Dems with such apologetic enthusiasm, as if the Dems will offer them a consolation prize in return. Carter, anyone?

2,021 posted on 09/13/2018 11:15:10 AM PDT by mairdie

To: aMorePerfectUnion

Is this a play on words given rumors of “her” birth as something else? If she was a woman, why did they have to adopt two girls to complete their family? Did she conception issues? Everything with these two is a mystery.

2,022 posted on 09/13/2018 11:17:03 AM PDT by Metrobank

To: Calm_Cool_and_Elected

Nope.

That wasn't Jesus. That was Jesus. Tortilla, hello?

Real Jesus only appears in toast and pancakes.

Duh?

Bagster

2,023 posted on 09/13/2018 11:17:44 AM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas".)

To: mongrel; Hostage

that was a half-way decent response to a Freeper who has been a PITA troll on the “Q” threads.
Surprised that a “”Q” reference outside of a “Q” thread post didn’t get zotted :)

2,024 posted on 09/13/2018 11:18:01 AM PDT by stylin19a ((Best.Election.Of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever))

“””It is too much trouble, all the little fields ya gotta fill out. That’s why I decided to become a commentator, not a thread poster.”””

Yes. ADD + impatience + code + too fast = carelessness.

Carelessness + mighty FR flamesters + grammar nazis + false projectors = frustration n time wasted. Who needs it?

2,025 posted on 09/13/2018 11:18:33 AM PDT by haffast (SUPERPOWER STATUS: ON!!)

To: Steven W.; ransomnote; KitJ; bagster; No_Doll_i; TEXOKIE; bitt; PMAS; Scott from the Left Coast; ...

ThanQ very much for that Google staff video link!

I find I need to watch it in increments. It's difficult to accept that people with that much power are so totally irrational and deluded in their beliefs!

That vid is, indeed, a painful peek inside the Satanic Deep State! (One almost expects to see horns budding from the skulls of a few of those slick individuals...)

Most distressing of all is to see that level of evil being openly declared as the "Operating Principle" of such a fearsomely-powerful social engineering tool!

Perhaps I missed it -- but, IMO, that URL deserves to be the sole focus of a major Q Drop!

TXnMA

2,026 posted on 09/13/2018 11:22:03 AM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias. "Islam": Satan's invading army. "Muslims": Satan's useful idiots.)

Not being argumentative here; rather,

Not to worry, TX. Nothing wrong with a good argument. Some people pay good money for one.

Watch the following undercover video taken by Project Veritus.

Bagster

2,027 posted on 09/13/2018 11:23:53 AM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas".)

To: stylin19a; bagster

:: Surprised that a “”Q” reference outside of a “Q” thread post didn’t get zotted :) ::

Courtesy ping!

2,028 posted on 09/13/2018 11:24:48 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)

To: Calm_Cool_and_Elected; bagster; Cletus.D.Yokel

“””I remember one in NM where Jesus appeared in a tortilla.”””

That one! I seen it! I swear!

Found one a few nights ago in a bag I bought. Can’t decide to either 2 coats polyurethane it and hang it on the wall or sell it on Ebay. Prob will get hungry. TBD

#bagsterfunnies

2,029 posted on 09/13/2018 11:28:35 AM PDT by haffast (SUPERPOWER STATUS: ON!!)

Prob will get hungry. TBD

Don't you dare.

That's a one way ticket to perdition, or so I've heard.

#NeverEatJesus

Bagster

2,030 posted on 09/13/2018 11:31:57 AM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas".)

To: little jeremiah

No denying, lots of bad stuff too. But women finally got full property rights, equal pay, etc.

Both good and bad. And probably the worst of all was our welfare system paying families to stay unmarried, poor and apart. That is the sort of stuff that will take real change and time to repair.

BTW—Ivanka’s government-funded family leave and child care reimbursement isn’t just terrible economic policy—it is bad for families as well. Day care is a disaster for all but those who somehow absolutely need it.

2,031 posted on 09/13/2018 11:33:33 AM PDT by 9YearLurker

To: little jeremiah

No denying, lots of bad stuff too. But women finally got full property rights, equal pay, etc.

Both good and bad. And probably the worst of all was our welfare system paying families to stay unmarried, poor and apart. That is the sort of stuff that will take real change and time to repair.

2,032 posted on 09/13/2018 11:33:51 AM PDT by 9YearLurker

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

“””How are a landscaper and a cigar alike?”

Smells and you can watch your money go up in smoke?

2,033 posted on 09/13/2018 11:33:52 AM PDT by haffast (SUPERPOWER STATUS: ON!!)

If you get hungry, I’ll light a candle for it....

2,034 posted on 09/13/2018 11:35:23 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)

Nope.
The best ones are from the Dominican Republic.

2,035 posted on 09/13/2018 11:36:43 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)

I suspect RMN was also DS. So I don’t know how to reconcile that.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The globalists will toss one of their own overboard if called for by their objectives. For example, I believe GHWB was moved aside to put a RAT in office (Clinton) who would be capable of getting NAFTA and WTO ratified in the RAT-controlled Senate.

We usually think of Nixon in terms of Roe v. Wade and Vietnam, including the protests; HOWEVER ...

Nixon's Presidency was a major turning point in the world financial system. He was a Rockefeller man, as were Kissinger and the highly influential banking advisor, Paul Volcker.

Together these plotted a course for the U.S. which would lead to ever-increasing trade and fiscal deficits. This included substituting the US Dollar for gold as the reserve currency of the world in 1971, and influencing the formation of OPEC ... plus the petro-dollar conveyor belt back into New York banks.

These policies, together with the opening with China, set up the circumstances which, about a decade later, would pressure the USSR into collapse (under guidance of Reagan and with Volcker as Chairman of FED).

SO WHY TAKE NIXON OUT?

Is it POSSIBLE Nixon was going to expose the Communist sleeper cells that remained in place, at the highest levels of government, media, academia and I.C. since the FDR administration?

Is it POSSIBLE Nixon was going to expose the sick/corrupt/pedophile culture of Washington D.C. ... delivering a major blow to, amongst others, the "Intelligence Community?"

Is it POSSIBLE they just needed the [Warren-Commission-CORRUPT] Gerald Ford to become President, and make Nelson Rockefeller V.P. (for some unknown plan)?

Just food for thought. I do not yet feel confident about the reasons Nixon was removed.

2,036 posted on 09/13/2018 11:37:28 AM PDT by Disestablishmentarian (Read "American Betrayal" by Diana West)

> "Huber is working as de facto SC. Q alluded to to this in several drops". You get to "allude" about "Q" and nobody else does ? "

ALL CAPS KEEP IN MIND SESSIONS IS RECUSED, THEREFORE CAN HAVE NO CONTACT, NO TOUCH, NO DISCUSSIONS, NO PHONE CALLS, NO MEMOS, NO DOCUMENTS COMING OR GOING, NO REMARKS, NO PRESS COMMENTARY ___ ON ANYTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA. COUP CABAL ARE INNOCULATED, PROTECTED BY PSYCHOLOGICAL PROJECTION AGAINST ANY INVESTIGATION INTO THEM INVOLVING RUSSIA ___ CLEVER TRICK YES? HOW TO DEFEAT WITHOUT AG INVOLVED? ANONS THINK 2ND SC IS ANSWER. NO. BETTER ANSWER IS HUBER.

Now to Huber; 92 references to Huber in Q drops.

Q linked article referring to Huber as better than SC on multiple occasions. Linked to Breitbart Turley article TWELVE times, starting in #986 April 2 and most recent in #1975 August 28.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/03/31/turley-sessions-using-utah-federal-prosecutor-much-better-trump-2nd-special-counsel/

Why is Q pounding Anons with Breitbart link?

Anons are arguing with Q that nothing is being done, that another SC is needed. Q responds, from Q Post #2071:

But… HUBER [ability to prosecute + empanel a grand jury outside of 
DC [90%+ voted HRC (2016)], who already began the 
investigation(s) late last year w/ assigned team of 470 investigators
(attorneys) + IG + legal jurisdiction across all 50 states, is not a 
‘special counsel’ so therefore nothing is being done

Q is saying to complaining Anons that Huber is acting as de facto SC but a better version of one.

One example of many, relatively recent #2007:

Why is 'Huber' being discussed now?
What if the TX Congressman was not supposed to drop that 
name?
Why is 'Huber' being discussed now?
Why is 'Huber' (all of a sudden) being grouped into the 'Anti-
Sessions' remove, fire, ….nothing being done?
Discussed by Right or Left?
Huber did not 'directly' interview….[insert name]?
Huber did not…….
Huber did not…….
Sessions did not…….
Sessions did not…….
When will Sessions…….
When will Sessions…….
Who does Huber work with specifically?
Who investigates?
Who prosecutes?
Team of 470?
Will BO transcripts be released?
Huber + IG + 470?
Inside or outside of the DC [SWAMP]?
How many members of Congress not seeking re-election?
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE not seeking re-election?
How many Senators have resigned or not seeking another term?
How many (senior) FBI have been removed?
How many (senior) DOJ have been removed?
Nothing to See Here.
But….
We should 'attack' them 'head on'….in DC….using a 2nd SC….
Emotion clouds judgement.

What is Q saying in #2007 above?

Q is responding to Anons and to Members in Congress and high profile conservatives. What are they clamoring about? They are clamoring about nothing being done, that a 2nd special counsel is needed. Q says no. This is counterproductive. Q keeps linking Breitbart article quoting Turley.

The reason to downplay Sessions: First, Sessions can't have a thing to do with the most important fight, most important focus of Trump Presidency which is the coup. Why is it the 'most important'? Because if coup is successful, the entire Trump movement comes down, collapses. Q says the Midterms are everything to the Dems/Left. Ergo, everything is secondary to the coup and Sessions has taken himself out of it. Second, Sessions is replaceable but not now because GOP members have conferred with POTUS that Sessions removal now will raise campaign issue and cause turmoil leading to Midterms. So Sessions stays for now.

Sessions is not hated, not disliked. Sessions is viewed with frustration. Folklore has arisen that Sessions is a master plotter behind the scenes. No, Sessions is recused. People keep forgetting that and/or they don't know what it means. It means Sessions can't have an iota of anything to do with the coup because the projection to Russian Collusion has been partially successful. This is why WH warriors turned to IG and IG's 470 investigating army of attorneys, inspectors, auditors. But IG needed capability to subpoena, to convene grand jury, to indict ==> HUBER!

But Sessions could not hire Huber to investigate coup cabal including Uranium One because Sessions is recused, So Sessions hired Huber to investigate many things outside of Russia scope including child trafficking. But Huber is investigating coup plotters, who broadened Huber's scope? Not RR. Answer is WH. POTUS did via WH lawyers. People forget POTUS is Chief Prosecutor in the land, not Sessions.

Why wasn't RR tasked to investigate coup plotters? Obvious, RR is part of problem.

Who is smearing Q for saying "TRUST SESSIONS"? Q haters criticize Q followers for believing in a conspiracy that says to TRUST SESSIONS.

But Q has not said to trust Sessions for a long time. POTUS did not increase his attacks on Sessions until mid-August starting with Ainsley Earhardt interview on Fox.

Sessions is not trusted to stop coup. Sessions is recused. Sessions can have nothing to do with coup prosecution, nothing, not one iota of involvement.

Sessions will be treated respectfully. He will step down in November. He will be thanked for his service. A WH shakeup will ensue. An Acting AG will be brought in under 1998 Vacancies Reform Act. In the months following, Acting AG will clean up the coup attempt. If Senate is retained by GOP, a new AG will be appointed and confirmed. If no GOP control, POTUS must rely on statutes that allow selecting from DOJ employees that have been with DOJ in capacity for at least a year. Another reason for delay is to give chance to groom candidates for Acting AG. Vacancies Reform Act statutes allow for any person of POTUS choosing to act for 210 days. Need groom other promising candidates for 210 + 155 days. There is a timeline for all this to occur.

The DOJ/FBI are entrenched with Obama/Clinton cultists. This has been stated on Q threads. Timeline is made against statutes to allow for grooming new DOJ/FBI groups loyal to MAGA. DOJ prosecutes Obama/Clinton network but first need to identify, clean out entrenched Obama/Clinton acolytes.

2,037 posted on 09/13/2018 11:38:16 AM PDT by Hostage (Article V (Proud Member of the Deranged Q Fringe))

I totally dorked my link.

Here is the Project Veritas undercover video I referenced above. Sorry about the confusion.

Oh, Is this a five minute argument, or the full half hour?

Bagster

2,038 posted on 09/13/2018 11:39:33 AM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas".)

To: stylin19a; Hostage

Thanks, I couldn’t figure out what Hostage was saying. That makes sense.

2,039 posted on 09/13/2018 11:41:14 AM PDT by mongrel

To: Disestablishmentarian

:: Nixon’s Presidency was a major turning point in the world financial system. He was a Rockefeller man, as were Kissinger and the highly influential banking advisor, Paul Volcker. ::

Could it be that there was too much risk of the USA becoming an economic force more powerful than the New World Order (Bush41)?

2,040 posted on 09/13/2018 11:41:37 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794