|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted on 09/09/2018 5:27:46 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
Threadreader ImperatorRex A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming: major Swamp Draining. - overview
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Article Sundance Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Thread Martin Geddes WWG1WGA: The greatest communications event in history - 4 min - quick overview
“Pay Attention”
Thread Qmap.pub Q drops - created by Q, searchable by date or drop number, many additional features
Thread Qanon.app Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Thread Qanonposts.com Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
Website Qntmpkts.keybase.pub Q drops - copied from Q’s 8chan board
“The Truth Is Spreading”
Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump
Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference
Table Anonymous Q Threads - Our prior Q threads on Free Republic
“Power to the People”
YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops
Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Neonrevolt Includes highly detailed, investigative Q-drop reactions
Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
I didn’t catch that.
Good one. Q said: APACHE
no elaboration. Maybe this is it?
In other words, Woodward & Bernstein is one of those “Sleeper cells” John Podesta now claims “have awoken.”
Sessions wrote a letter to those three?
QOVFEFE™
You’re probably right.
.... though I’m kind of hoping for some connection to weather control.
We need a concept in this country that there is jounalism and there is advocacy disguised as journalism but in reality is just party propaganda. Journalism (the reporting of the facts of a given event in order to inform) should always be fully protected. Advocacy is opinion, and that also is protected as free speech, but not necessarily treated the same. It can be considered a part of a party that is subject to donation rules; it might not be entitled to the deference that Sullivan v NY Times gave to journalists in libel cases, they should be subject to conspiracy when they leak classified information, etc.
Great post and I’m in agreement.
My only problem is that I suspect RMN was also DS. So I don’t know how to reconcile that. I agree he was attacked over what today would be a triviality and he was hounded out of office, which is much the same playbook they are trying to use against Trump, only with zero evidence. Did RMN just get too uppity and the DS stopped being able to control him? Or was he never DS? Or what????
... also as GHWB is to Reagan.
I adored Nixon and cried when he resigned. He wasn’t the fighter Trump is and loved his country too much to put it through the trauma and viciousness of the left. I still adore him. The left got too pleased with itself for destroying Nixon and thinks Trump is made of the same material. Big mistake.
:)
Bagster
Any more info on how the PO was used? Something other than mailing letters, I’m guessing.
One reason I ask is because my local PO seems to have been taken over by the Chinese mafia. Nothing against the Chinese per se; wonderful Chinese woman cuts my hair and I’ve worked with many Chinese engineers.
FITFLOL
Thanks, mairdie, for that perspective. I wasn’t paying attention at the time, though I leaned R and therefore leaned pro-Nixon. I think there is a lot to be uncovered about what went on then, too.
~~~~
Are you of the opinion that Q doesn't have editorial input on the titling?
Or -- do you have actual "inside" info?
ThanQ!
TXnMA
“””....Once they became “almighty King killers” they then fancied themselves as “king makers”.”””
“But Clinton stopped short of saying he had never committed adultery in his past. “You are trying to put this issue behind you,” Kroft said. “And the problem with the answer is it’s not a denial. And people are sitting out there, voters, and they’re saying, ‘Look, it’s really pretty simple ... if he’s never had an extramarital affair, why doesn’t he just say so?’”
Years later, 60 Minutes producer Don Hewitt admitted that he intentionally edited the interview to portray Clinton in a more sympathetic light. “It was strong medicine, the way I edited it,” said Hewitt.
“He was a very sick candidate, he needed a very strong medicine and I’m not in the business of doctoring candidates, but he got up out of his sick bed that night and walked to a nomination.”
- Interview with Don Hewitt, The Clinton Chronicles
http://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Roger%20Stone,%20Robert%20Morrow%20-%20The%20Clintons%27%20War%20on%20Women.pdf (indexed Hewitt p.66)
Bill Hillary Clinton Extramarital Affairs 1992 60 Minutes before lights fell
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyumcdeZ4uY
Back to at least Walter C., and further back to The Garden.
Oh, “loquacious”, had to look that up 25yrs ago. Imagine that. ;)
correction....discusses seismic event off Carolina coast in 2013
What CNN, MSNBC, WaPo, NYT etc do should be considered in kind campaign contributions.
“Are you of the opinion that Q doesn’t have editorial input on the titling?
Or — do you have actual “inside” info?”
No inside info, I just think that Q is not involved in the adding of titles to qmap.pub reposts of Q’s 8chan posts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
