Posted on 09/06/2018 1:18:48 PM PDT by Morgana
FULL TITLE: Hey Kamala Harris: “Government Has Power Over the Male Body” Already. 1,268 Boys Die Every Day in Abortions
During yesterday’s Supreme Court hearings, pro-abortion California Senator Kamala Harris thought she would be sly by asking Brett Kavanaugh a ridiculous question concerning Roe v Wade.
Harris attempted a witty question to somehow attempt to make it look like Kavanaugh is sexist and hypocritical when it comes to the issue of abortion. Because abortion advocates erroneously think that laws protecting unborn children somehow control women’s bodies (even though an abortion destroys the life of a unique human being) Harris asked Kavanagh whether or not there were any laws covering a man’s body.
She asked Kavanaugh if he knew of any laws “that the government has power to make over the male body?”
Kavanaugh paused for a minute and responded that he would provide an answer for a more specific question if Harris had one.
“Um … I’m happy to answer a more specific question, but …”
“Male versus female, ” Harris responded curtly.
The problem with Harris’ question is that she completely ignores how government has the power via legalized abortion to control the bodies of both men and women. Little boys and girls each and every day are killed in abortions.
SIGN THE PETITION: Vote to Confirm Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh
So just how many male bodies does legalized abortion control on a daily basis? For the answer we turn to the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute — which was formally affiliated with and named for a top official with the Planned Parenthood abortion business. Last January, the Guttmacher Institute issued what people on both sides of the abortion debate considered to be the most accurate tally of annual abortions.
The pro-abortion research group, considered to have the most comprehensive abortion numbers for the U.S., reported an estimated 926,200 abortions in 2014 and 958,700 in 2013.
And when you do the math, that’s 1,268 “male bodies” destroyed each and every day in abortions because the Supreme Court decided in 1973 via Roe v. Wade that it supposedly had the power to eviscerate the right to life the Constitution guarantees. And Senator Harris, that’s 1,268 little girls whose bodies government has said it has the power to be allowed to be destroyed in abortions as well. With over 61 million abortions destroying the bodies and lives of boys and girls since 1973, Senator Harris when will you speak up about that power grab — which is perhaps the biggest power grab by the United States government in its history? If you’re that concerned with government making laws controlling people’s bodies, when will you bother to condemn that?
How many senators does it take to fellatio Willie Brown.
Yeah Kamala. It was called the draft and it controlled lots of male bodies all the way to their graves, you twit.
Exactly. Not only that, but if a man gets a woman pregnant he bears legal responsibility for that child - as he should.
And this POS commie wants to run for president?
BRING IT!
It’s stunningly obvious Harris and others are in the pocket of he who ‘was a murderer from the beginning’..... The fight to kill babies goes on relentlessly and with great power to make certain the slaughter of children isn’t stopped.
A man doesn’t have a reproductive system that forms and grows an independent and unique human. Take it up with Darwin, Ms Harris.
“And this POS commie wants to run for president”?
We need to start stressing RIGHT NOW that this Marxist Robspierre is NOT an Article II, clause 5 , section 1 Natural Born Citizen. We were not able to get the SCOTUS to examine this issue directly, for the first time in US history, with Obama; but Article III, Sec 2 states that an examination of this issue is within it’s judicial power.
There is ample precedent and SCOTUS findings that define what an NBC is, and Harris fits NONE of those definitions.
Let us hope that we will not be afraid to force this issue.
Childish. A woman has more choices than a male.
It is assumed that a woman should be free to avoid the predictable consequence of having a sex life.
A male has no similar right to a sex life with an escape hatch for legal consequences of parenthood.
A woman can elect out, a male cannot. He is told keep it zipped if he doesn’t want to be a parent. Women are never told this in our culture.
Correction: make that Article II, Section 1 clause 5.
But he has no authority to protect his child from the child's murderous mother. Where's the justice in THAT?
And in Casey vs. Planned Parenthood of PA, the supremes decided that the woman alone can kill the unbor n child without even consulting her husband.
“Where’s the justice in THAT?”
There is none.
This may be why she is one of the most adamant opponents of Kavanaugh.
Exactly. Our “legal” support for the slaughter of unborn children is a hideous bloodstain on the body politic of this Great Republic. The American Abortion Regime has produced more death than the German National Socialist Regime or the Russian Communist Regime.
Roe vs. Wade says that men’s daughters and sons can be killed by women.
There is a natural right for men - and women - to protect their daughters and sons from being killed by anyone.
Enforcing that will be the greatest step towards the protection of equal rights possible.
Conception, in the course of consensual relations between a man and a woman, is consent to parenthood.
We can probably be sure, Kamala wouldn’t suffice. She’s too self-absorbed and into herself to satisfy anyone or anything.
He should have replied, “Huh? Oh, you put me to sleep.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.