Posted on 09/04/2018 9:47:42 PM PDT by JME_FAN
The cash cow #Qanon is over. pic.twitter.com/opU3kDpdik— Ginger McQueen (@GingerMcQueen) September 5, 2018
PART 1
#QAnon hoax starter exposed by @JackPosobiec pic.twitter.com/a8ghv9pXsx— IH8SESSIONS OBI ❌ (@ObiWanKEKobi) September 5, 2018
PART 2
Part 2... pic.twitter.com/9IkAEq99sK— IH8SESSIONS OBI ❌ (@ObiWanKEKobi) September 5, 2018
But... but... I was stupid and lazy for not believing! Surely the geniuses who denounced me on these pages couldn’t be dumbasses, could they?
And you call THIS credible evidence?
This explains what happened, starting with the Original “Q” - “Microchip” and “Dreamcatcher” on 4-Chan (The second iteration of “Q” that said not to monetize); but then came the third iteration of “Q” (the “bakers,” aka “Nemos,” “Pamphlet” “Praying Medic,” etc.) those who saw big profits to be made.
This guy has the goods, and explains the entire QAnon scheme:
https://twitter.com/UNIRockTV/status/1037187556478091264
Nothing that’s not publicly available today — or just about any day — from Qanon.
***but he’s wrong***
Please prove your assertion. Site your evidence.
I swear, this site(and most of the web) needs a no bullsh!t challenge channel where if you are challenged on an assertion, you must provide credible evidence. It should be structured in such a way that the evidence is vetted when it can be, and the person asserting the bullsh!t eventually gets demoted off the platform.
“But... but... I was stupid and lazy for not believing!”
I was called all sorts of names for suggesting that the very name “Q” as in the gadget maker in James Bond movies was a sly proof of a hoax.
A real insider would have just dropped the information in plain English.
Don’t put words in my mouth. I MADE NO ASSERTION! I am fed up with ASSERTIONS WITH NO EVIDENCE! Site your sources, back up your assertions. Do it in the post that YOU MAKE YOUR ASSERTION!
Praying Medic? OK if you say so. Lol.
Is this guy “wrong” too?
_____________________________
Yes. Yes, he’s wrong too. That’s two people who are wrong. Well, let’s count you too, so that’s three. Every few weeks they come out with another fake “debunk” of Q that is itself debunked before it hits the ground. Rinse and repeat. Meanwhile events continue to unfold as described by Q.
It has been my experience that when you tell conservatives that they have been or are being lied to, they just get angry at you and continue to believe the lies because it’s just easier that way, and they don’t have to admit that they were fooled.
YOURE ASSERTING THIS POST IS ACCURATE BY NOT QUESTIONING IT.
You’re only demanding “evidence” from those disagreeing with the YouTube video.
That’s not putting words in your mouth - that’s basic observation skills.
I just asked why you deem the YouTube video as trustworthy but managed to uncover a troll.
Like I said, I don’t care for anon sources so Q has always been dead to me. I don’t know or care what “Q” has to say.
On 4-Chan the original “QAnon” - first-class hacker and blogger, who uses the handle “Microchip” - released all his chat logs, b/c he is so distraught over how his original hoax has become this destructive multi-headed hydra. Those logs show all the QAnon “predictions / proofs,” as MICROCHIP created them BEFORE they were released by the so-called QAnon.
This is critical to understand. Chat logs cannot be falsified. The creator of “Q” is himself providing the evidence that he is the original source this entire ruse.
****YOURE ASSERTING THIS POST IS ACCURATE BY NOT QUESTIONING IT****
False dichotomy. I asserted nothing about the OP. Ask me about what I think about the OP and I will tell you what I think about the OP.
The problem is that, regardless of your stance on the issue, many of Trump’s base are falling for this crap. It is dividing his base. That will have a very bad result during the midterms - IF those who believe this “QAnon” bullsh*t choose to not be active in getting out the vote, because they think some “white hat” is going to march on the scene and “fix” everything w/o we voters lifting a finger in support of Trump.
Do you understand the problem?
Sad to admit, but you may be correct. In this instance, the consequences might well be disastrous.
Trump has already mentioned not listening to anonymous sources(in a recent Twitter tweet), but has not directly mentioned Q. If Trump sees a real threat from the Q I have confidence he will deal with it.
Chat Logs cannot be screwed with.
—
Everything can be screwed with.
People see what they want to see.
I stopped wanting.
It matters not what Trumps sees or does not see as a threat. In this case what matters is the effectiveness of his base in getting out the vote.
You have many “first-time voters,” whose political life began in 2016 with Trump’s candidacy. If they are also Q followers, and become discouraged when they finally realize they have been played, and no “white hat” is coming to the rescue, they may feel so discouraged as to not show up at the polls.
If we lose the HOR, it will be a disaster for Trump’s agenda - and perhaps his presidency or chances for reelection in 2020.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.