Interesting.
Bagster
The problem is that, regardless of your stance on the issue, many of Trump’s base are falling for this crap. It is dividing his base. That will have a very bad result during the midterms - IF those who believe this “QAnon” bullsh*t choose to not be active in getting out the vote, because they think some “white hat” is going to march on the scene and “fix” everything w/o we voters lifting a finger in support of Trump.
Do you understand the problem?
Trump has already mentioned not listening to anonymous sources(in a recent Twitter tweet), but has not directly mentioned Q. If Trump sees a real threat from the Q I have confidence he will deal with it.
There is no substitute for propositional truth. Not riddles or innuendo. It was obvious this was coming from a kid, but people enjoyed the fantasy because it offered them an escape from doing the really hard work of solving really hard problems:
1. We are not producing conservative youth fast enough. There is no truly American curriculum that produces it in public schools. As a consequence, our kids do not know how to think-- and many FReepers, sadly, are untrained. We will be voted out soon enough. DJT isn't going to save us from that. It is a state and municipal responsibility.
2. Tangentially, two disparate understandings of the Constitution cannot coexist. The 2nd Civil War is already here. It is interesting that the first Civil War was similar: It was first a struggle for the mind, and how we thought about major issues that would control American life.
I have retained a healthy skepticism about Q but Q is all about activism and research, so your argument falls flat.
most of those fallowing the Q posts are the last one to miss a chance to vote for trump...think rabid sports fan...
Interesting.
Bagster
Interesting correlation you make there, derp stater.
How did you make it?
I got another one. Left-scum believe that Mueller will take down Trump. They will become complacent, thinking some black knight will come save them and they will choose to not get out the vote.
So I guess we're even. See how that works? I'm smart like you.
Bagster
Whether Q is fake or not, it is wrong to assert that those who believe him won’t vote in November.
Whatever happens, the WWG1WGA movement is POLITICAL, drawing in massive amounts of supporters, who will most definitely vote Republican.
Read the Great Awakening subreddit. Support grows daily. These aren’t wooly-heads. They’re activists.
You seem to have a propensity for jumping to conclusions here:
{The problem is that, regardless of your stance on the issue, many of Trump’s base are falling for this crap. It is dividing his base. That will have a very bad result during the midterms}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
People who are following the stream of information provided by Q are either Republicans and will vote for President Trump and in the midterms will vote for those who will further the Presidents agenda. If they are Dem’s who are infiltrators they would vote Dem regardless.
____________________________________________________________________________________
{-IF those who believe this “QAnon” bullsh*t choose to not be active in getting out the vote, because they think some “white hat” is going to march on the scene and “fix” everything w/o we voters lifting a finger in support of Trump.}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I am gathering, from this run on sentence, that you are trying to say individuals who follow Q don’t support President Trump?
How does trying to look for evidence for one’s self imply not supporting Republican’s in the midterms? When Q makes his comments, the anons and FreeQs do real time research to find the insideous dark side of Dem’s ultimate goal; to overthrow our great country. This information may be very useful at the right time.
____________________________________________________________________________________
{Do you understand the problem?}
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only problem I can see here is that there are people who jump to wild conclusions. You need to have supportable premises of your argument to reach a valid conclusion. Regretfully, that is missing. Instead what I see is an angry person venting without even knowing what he’s really angry about.
- Unless there is an ulterior motive to your rant?
How would believing Q or not believing in Q affect whether you get out to vote or not? Not being argumentative just wondering how you conclude that affects voting.