|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Posted on 07/25/2018 10:10:41 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
YouTube Thoughts Not Bots Who is Q - 4 min - quick overview
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Threadreader ImperatorRex A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming: major Swamp Draining. - overview
Article Sundance Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
“Pay Attention” Thread Qanon.pub Q drops - created by Q on Q’s 8chan board
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
“The Truth Is Spreading” Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference “Power to the People” YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
Keep in mind True Pundit broke this story on November 2, 2016. (That’s 21 months ago for those keeping score).
Now, today, the Inspector General confirmed the FBI knew there was evidence on Anthony Weiner’s laptop and Hillary Clinton’s emails linked to sex crimes against children.
And James Comey was briefed about it.
From our 2016 news breaking article:
New York Police Department detectives and prosecutors working an alleged underage sexting case against former Congressman Anthony Weiner have turned over a newly-found laptop he shared with wife Huma Abedin to the FBI with enough evidence “to put Hillary (Clinton) and her crew away for life,” NYPD sources told True Pundit.
The NYPD seized the computer from Weiner during a search warrant and detectives discovered a trove of over 500,000 emails to and from Hillary Clinton, Abedin and other insiders during her tenure as secretary of state. The content of those emails sparked the FBI to reopen its defunct email investigation into Clinton on Friday.
But new revelations on the contents of that laptop, according to law enforcement sources, implicate the Democratic presidential candidate, her subordinates, and even select elected officials in far more alleged serious crimes than mishandling classified and top secret emails, sources said. NYPD sources said these new emails include evidence linking Clinton herself and associates to:
Money laundering
Child exploitation
Sex crimes with minors (children)
Perjury
Pay to play through Clinton Foundation
Obstruction of justice
Other felony crimes
Now, today, sex crimes with minors is mentioned several times in the 500-page IG report.
Here is the first, where a FBI investigator testifies he debriefed Comey on the materials after being notified of the sex-crimes-linked intelligence from the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division. Page 294:
Under the heading — “Hillary Clinton & Foundation Crime Against Children:”
Comey, it appears, claims he was never told about this. Convenient.
It’s comforting to know a report of sex crimes linked to the former secretary of state, former U.S. senator and former First Lady would not be remembered by the FBI director.
More from the IG report detailed here: Page 276: https://truepundit.com/ig-report-confirms-true-pundit-bombshell-on-hillarys-emails-details-comey-was-briefed-on-clinton-linked-sex-crimes-against-children-evidence-on-weiner-laptop/
..................
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/09/20/day-2-hillarys-i-t-guy-paul-combetta-aka-stonetear-the-reddit-and-the-timeline/
..................
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/10/29/official-tens-of-thousands-of-emails-belonging-to-ms-abedin-on-mr-weiners-laptop/
.......................
New York Police Department detectives and prosecutors working an alleged underage sexting case against former Congressman Anthony Weiner have turned over a newly-found laptop he shared with wife Huma Abedin to the FBI with enough evidence “to put Hillary (Clinton) and her crew away for life,” NYPD sources told True Pundit.
NYPD sources said Clinton’s “crew” also included several unnamed yet implicated members of Congress in addition to her aides and insiders.
“It involves Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin, and Bill Clinton as well as Jeffrey Epstein,” DC insider Doug Hagmann said on The Alex Jones Show Wednesday. “According to my source, these files exist – he did not touch these files so he doesn’t know what’s in them, but the fact that they exist on this computer suggest some sort of overlap here.”
“It involves the Saudis, very big money and interests in the Middle East, and it involves Hillary, Huma, and to a much lesser extent Anthony Weiner.”
The NYPD seized the computer from Weiner during a search warrant and detectives discovered a trove of over 500,000 emails to and from Hillary Clinton,
(this is the smoking gun right here,you either believe the NYPD got the computer or they didn't)
Abedin and other insiders during her tenure as secretary of state. The content of those emails sparked the FBI to reopen its defunct email investigation into Clinton on Friday.
But new revelations on the contents of that laptop, according to law enforcement sources, implicate the Democratic presidential candidate, her subordinates, and even select elected officials in far more alleged serious crimes than mishandling classified and top secret emails, sources said. NYPD sources said these new emails include evidence linking Clinton herself and associates to:
Money laundering
Child exploitation
Sex crimes with minors (children)
Perjury
Pay to play through Clinton Foundation
Obstruction of justice
Other felony crimes
NYPD detectives and a NYPD Chief, the department’s highest rank under Commissioner, said openly that if the FBI and Justice Department fail to garner timely indictments against Clinton and co- conspirators, NYPD will go public with the damaging emails now in the hands of FBI Director James Comey and many FBI field offices.
https://www.infowars.com/breaking-bombshell-nypd-blows-whistle-on-new-hillary-emails-money-laundering-sex-crimes-with-children-child-exploitation-pay-to-play-perjury/
.................
Above appears to be the smoking gun establishing the story line that the NYPD originally got the laptop went through it looking for Weiner pedo crimes and were shocked at what they found.
Eventually they turned it over to the FBI.
Looks real to me.
Sleeper agent is not an option I presented.
I presented bias, either intentional or unintentional. Do you claim that your silly scorecard was a fair representation of what was happening?
Not sure why we are having this discussion. You seem to verify what I am seeing - True Pundit\Erik Prince are the only ones referring to NYPD.
In all you’ve posted, only True Pundit has the NYPD story line. Anyone else who reports on it refers to True Pundit.
Nothing you provided shows differently. None of the non-True Pundit links you’ve provided mentions NYPD, except Info Wars and their report refers\links to the True Pundit report.
There is no evidence that NYPD seized the laptop, only True Pundit and Erik Prince’s word.
I provided to you the warrant showing Weiner voluntarily gave up his laptop to a private firm.
I went down this rabbit hole a long time ago and came to the conclusion I came to, based on the same type of research you are doing.
In all this time, I can find no NYPD warrant for a seizure of Weiner’s laptop and not one person from NYPD has come forward and verified their participation.
I hope you find something different, but I’m done looking for it.
maybe I will continue down this rabbit hole. I don’t know who hired Granite Intelligence LLC for the 9/23/2016 warrant for Weiner’s devices.
cripes...every time I think I’m out they pull me back in.
YOU:SHAME!
This is UTTERLY FALSE. The destruction of Arthur Andersen was a great crime against a venerated and great American accounting firm.
Well, here's the Wikipedia summary on the former company:
In 2002, the firm voluntarily surrendered its licenses to practice as Certified Public Accountants in the United States after being found guilty of criminal charges relating to the firm's auditing of Enron, an energy corporation based in Texas, which filed for bankruptcy in 2001.[1] In 2005, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously reversed Arthur Andersen's conviction due to serious errors in the trial judge's instructions to the jury that convicted the firm.[2]...
On June 15, 2002, Andersen was convicted of obstruction of justice for shredding documents related to its audit of Enron, resulting in the Enron scandal. Although the Supreme Court reversed the firm's conviction, the impact of the scandal combined with the findings of criminal complicity ultimately destroyed the firm. Nancy Temple (in the firm's legal department) and David Duncan (lead partner for the Enron account) were cited as the responsible managers in this scandal because they ordered subordinates to shred relevant documents.
...
The indictment also put a spotlight on the firm's faulty audits of other companies, most notably Waste Management, Sunbeam, the Baptist Foundation of Arizona and WorldCom. The subsequent bankruptcy of WorldCom, which quickly surpassed Enron as the biggest bankruptcy in history (and has since been passed by the bankruptcies of Lehman Brothers and WaMu in the 2008 financial crisis) led to a domino effect of accounting and corporate scandals.
...
On May 31, 2005, in Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously reversed Andersen's conviction because of serious errors in the trial judge's jury instructions.[2] The Supreme Court held that the instructions were too vague to allow a jury to find that obstruction of justice had occurred. The court found that the instructions were worded in such a way that Andersen could have been convicted without any proof that the firm knew it had broken the law or that there had been a link to any official proceeding that prohibited the destruction of documents. The opinion, written by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, also expressed skepticism of the government's concept of "corrupt persuasion"—persuading someone to engage in an act with an improper purpose without knowing that the act is unlawful.
Since the ruling vacated Andersen's felony conviction, it theoretically left Andersen free to resume operations. The damage to the Andersen name was so severe, however, that it has not returned as a viable business even on a limited scale. There are over 100 civil suits pending against the firm related to its audits of Enron and other companies.[when?] Even before voluntarily surrendering its right to practice before the SEC, it had many of its state licences revoked. A new verb, "Enron-ed", was coined by John M. Cunningham, the former Arthur Andersen Director in the Seattle Office, to describe the demise of Arthur Andersen.
From a high of 28,000 employees in the US and 85,000 worldwide, the firm is now down to around 200, based primarily in Chicago. Most of their attention is on handling the lawsuits and presiding over the orderly dissolution of the company.
Sorry for my incomplete summary of Arthur Anderson's demise. I agree it's bad form to say that someone (or entity) has been convicted of a crime, even if they have, without noting that it was overturned on appeal, which it was in this case.
Maybe Arthur Anderson was a great accounting firm until this incident brought them down. I have a friend who worked for Enron, he says it was a great company too, and he too might also be right. Ken Lay's conviction was vacated upon his death, too.
There was a very strong scent of prosecutors over-reaching in their attacks on Enron and Anderson.
I suppose though, if I was one of the millions of shareholders who lost money in the Enron bankruptcy, or the bankruptcy of World Com, or the financial troubles of Waste Management, Sunbeam, and the Baptist Foundation of Arizona, due in part to faulty audits by Arthur Anderson, I might not feel the same way.
Those were the ONLY convictions left standing out of the over $150 billion Enron failure. . . and it was later found that Brown's opinion was TRUE! He did not lie. . . but he's left with a felony record.
What about Jeff Skilling?
Jeffrey Keith "Jeff" Skilling (born November 25, 1953) is a former American businessman best known as the CEO of Enron Corporation during the Enron scandal. In 2006, he was convicted of federal felony charges relating to Enron's collapse and, as of 2018, is serving a 14-year prison sentence at FPC Montgomery in Montgomery, Alabama.[2][3]After two appeals to the Supreme Court, he got one charge nullified, but then reinstated by a three judge panel of the circuit court. Eventually he was able to get his sentence reduced, but the convictions all stand.Trial Results:
- guilty on one count of conspiracy
- guilty on one count of insider trading
- guilty on five counts of making false statements to
- auditors
- guilty on twelve counts of securities fraud
- not guilty on nine counts of insider trading
According to the Bureau of Prisons, Skilling is incarcerated in FPC Montgomery and is scheduled for release on February 21, 2019. His original release date was in 2028,[46] but his sentence was reduced due to a sentencing agreement he struck with federal prosecutors in May 2013.[47]
Can you clarify your statement vis a vis this information?
New Qanon thread started Sunday:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3674854/posts
A lot of people are not seeing your posts.
Do you think True Pundit is a reliable source?
Arthur Anderson was Exonerated 9 to 0. They did NOTHING WRONG. There is nothing wrong in destruction of records that ARE NOT UNDER SUBPOENA and were not ever going to be under subpoena and have never been subject to subpoena before. Nor has an entire accounting firm EVER been indicted when only a single or small group been involved in wrong doing. THIS WAS CREATIVE PROSECUTION with no precedent!
This has NOTHING to do with what the Judge instructed the Jury. It has everything to do with what the LAW SAYS!
Again, READ "Licensed to Lie, Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice" by Lyndsy Powell. 2014. She was one of the team of lawyers who defended the Merrill Lynch four and one of the lawyers who argued the case before the 5th Circuit and the US Supreme Court and WON. Not some Wikipedia article.
I forgot about Jeff Skilling. . . Sorry about that. Except for the conspiracy charge, those were insider trading charges, brought by the SEC, not the Special Prosecutors task force. It was the conspiracy charge that was reversed by the Supreme Court. Do you seriously believe that a Three Judge Panel of a subordinate court can OVERRULE a decision vacating a conviction by the US Supreme Court? When the Supreme Court makes a decision, it's final.
None of those were counts that had anything to do with the actual failure of Enron, except the false statements to auditors. Which was part of Arthur Anderson's defense. . . that they were lied to, shown false data, by Enron officers. Yet the Prosecutors still went after AA for criminal actions on a count that simply did not exist.
The point was your statement was the Arthur Anderson was "COOKING THE BOOKS" for Enron which was a flat out FALSEHOOD.
You are the one who has played fast and loose with the facts.
.
You are grossly confused, and always willing to fabricate falsehood.
It is you who obviously hate Trump, or you wouldn’t post agitprop surrounding his presidency as you constantly do.
The point of my scorecard is to keep track of events not subject to interpretation. It's funny that someone can post a two page exposition on the "Q Clock", which even Bagster (our Lesser Oracle) says is bunk, but a simple chart of objective facts so upsets some people here.
I really don't get it.
I think my scorecard is very accurate representation of what is happening. One could argue that the points should be higher or lower, or even that the points are extraneous, and I would say that's a fair assessment.
But the simple facts remain that Mueller is creating a great deal of legal jeopardy, convictions, and consequences for people associated with Trump.
My scorecard doesn't include things that don't fit within the very narrow boundaries of indictments, guilty pleas, convictions (and "not guilty verdicts, should their ever be any)
For instance, I would say that Mueller's raid on Cohen's offices was a major blow against Trump. It was really inconceivable, violating a principle that has heretofore been held almost sacred in US courts. Even drug dealers attorneys are not raided and subject to having all of their papers seized.
But it hasn't resulted in any indictments, so it's not in my chart. It may be that my chart is underestimating the shellacking that Mueller is putting on Trump. When you flip a guys lawyer (which he appears to), that's gotta hurt, no matter what.
On the other side: well McCabe got fired for cause after an official finding that he lied. That's good. About 20 more like that please.
And Wolfe was indicted. As others have noticed, it's the lowest charge possible. Odd given that the indictment itself makes it clear he was leaking to three reporters. Perhaps the information being leaked was not classified?
Now the entire Q narrative is based on the idea that there is a second, secret process happening, and that it will eventually result in an overwhelming cascade of arrests, indictments, firings, and scandal.
We were promised a MOAB, and we've been promised that July would be a big month by Q and his interpreters. About 38 hours to go.
I too read Q's recent posts, where he takes naysayers to task for doubting what's going on, and points out the risk and danger that the "white hats" are under.
That implies to me that even from his point of view the outcome is not assured, there are tactics being tried, and then their are black hats devising responses and counter tactics. Some of the counters are effective.
Thought exercise: If we are sitting here on Jan 21, 2020 and a news President has been inaugurated and the score in my little chart is Mueller 65 to Trump 3, or something like that, with Mueller having succeeded in convicting even more people associated with Trump of various crimes, and the feckless DOJ and Congress essentially not laying a hand on the various criminals in the Obama administration - will you still be saying that my chart is biased? Or will you reluctantly concede that the narrative Mueller built, and supported with convictions and guilty pleas, painted a picture of Trump that hurt him. (No matter that it is not justified).
I'm looking forward to Team Trump scoring lots of points: all the people we've been promised. Hillary, Huma, Cheryl, Strzok, Page, Warner, Susan Rice, both Podestas ... we all know the names. And they are all walking free, giving speeches and sh*t-talking our President.
At this point the White Hats are losing based on what we can see and objectively measure.
Narrative, at the end of the day without indictments, is just talk, and doesn't mean much. Even things like the Strzok hearing, which I felt was devastating for him and the FBI, really doesn't mean much in this environment where you have Democratic hacks and the media backing the most ridiculous positions of the anti-Trump guys.
Without indictments Trump's position is precarious.
Retaining the House is clearly the most important goal for us as Trump supporters. If we lose that, and Mueller indicts Trump, even on his ridiculous charge of "obstruction" then his impeachment is assured. Maybe he can hold on in the Senate, but we all know how feckless RINOs are, and how infested the Senate is with them.
That's not the outcome I want, which is why I'm staying focused on the objective legal facts of the two sides.
We need indictments, we need convictions, we need guilty pleas.
You may note that I've recently added all the NIXVM cases to my chart. One of Q's main themes has been that there is huge corruption in the world, and that it is all connected, and that it's worse than just horny Harvey molesting starlets on the casting couch. We have not quite achieved convergence on NIXVM, but it's close.
My addition of this, even thought it's not (yet) connected to Mueller vs. Trump shows where my sympathy and bias lie.
I was supporting Trump when at least 1/2 of FR were for Ted Cruz, including a few people on this thread.
Still, despite all my love for Trump, my desire for the White Hats to win, my agony over the crimes that the Clintons and Obamas have gotten away with for decades, at this moment I do not feel the forces of good are winning.
Show me the indictments!
You have characterized my mistake as "playing fast and loose with the facts" a FALSEHOOD, etc.
I'm not on some mission to harm the reputation of Arthur Anderson, in fact, in reading what you've posted I tend to agree that it was a huge miscarriage of justice.
I've twice admitted I made a mistake here.
It was a very poor example to choose to use to illustrate my main point which is: just because some members of a profession fail to act in accordance with the standards of that profession, we don't write the whole profession off. (Maybe sometimes we do write off whole professions?)
I grabbed onto Arthur Anderson in the Enron as an example, and mischaracterized what happened.
You made a mistake in asserting that only one person was convicted of anything related to Enron. I accept that you had simply forgotten this fact, I'm not accusing you of "playing fast and loose with the facts" and propogating "FALSEHOOD", because, people make mistakes.
As I said: you obviously have a near-encyclopedic knowledge of the details of the demise of Arthur Anderson, and strong opinions on it. I respect that. I will readily admit that my initial comment (as an aside) was based only on my recollection of the highly publicized trial, and the unprecedented "Death Penalty" given to Arthur Anderson at the time. That was all front page news, and I remember it quite well.
The years-later vindication of AA in the Supreme Court I have no recollection of.
I do remember thinking at the time that it was unprecedented to shut down an entire company for the crimes of a few (even assuming there were crimes, which of course I now know they were not).
Even if a small team did something wrong I still don't understand killing the entire company over it. And this is the part I find most puzzling: "voluntarily surrendered its licenses to practice as Certified Public Accountants in the United States" In other words, they decided to go out of business, while still fighting the charges. Why wouldn't they have fought to keep their license? You can say "partnership" but then there are lots of partnerships, including law firms and other CPA firms, and you never see them obliterated by a single crime like this.
Perhaps it was the World Comm and other cases that were looming that made the PR hurdle just to big to get over?
You are clearly and purposefully missing the many firings and demotions in the DOJ and FBI. You also omit the CEO exedus, and the pedophile/ sex trafficking indictments and arrests.
Your scorecard is myopic, and biased. (And you don’t even reslize it, supposedly.)
Very telling, thanks!
And that will be true.
But it's NOT a counter to the case Mueller is building.
The point of the index isn't to score Trump as an effective President (I'd give him high marks for that) but to score Mueller's effectiveness in going after Trump, and the effectiveness of Trump's response.
I realize the CEO's resigning is the stuff that Q aficionados eat up, do YOU realize that it has absolutely no traction outside of the Q reality tunnel?
When Trump is charged with Obstruction he can response with "But look here, over 3,000 CEOs and other "important people" have resigned since I took office!
Even stipulating that, SO WHAT?
It's a non-story. It's not helping Trump.
I'm not even sure it's a real story ,I looked at the list and it CEOs of companies with <1,000 employees. It had police chiefs for little towns. There are 340 million Americans. Lots of them quit or retire every year, including CEOs and Police Chiefs.
It's not any sort of rigorous process to say "Look at all these people who quit -- and that proves Trump is ending the Deep State
Indictments talk, poorly defined lists, not so much.
There has been house cleaning at the DOJ and FBI, which you continue to refuse to acknowledge. All directly related to trump vs Mueller.
and if you get all the mixed metaphors, you probably graduated in the 70's!
Awesome ... Class of 1975 here!
You must be arguing that the NYPD did not get the laptop first they got it second hand or something. That could be possible. I’m infinitely more concerned about what is in the computer not who got it first, second or whatever. There is a very concentrated effort to keep the info contained within especially the 33k mails that Hillary bleach bit away from prying eyes.I think I know why.
Anyway, I was still impressed with the comments supposedly made by NYPD people about the content of the pedophila stuff contained on the computer.
I really don’t care who got it first or second if the data is good that’s my concern.
Also there is no telling how many copies of the laptop have been made at this point.
THat guy in the Sopranos is priceless,LOL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
