Not sure why we are having this discussion. You seem to verify what I am seeing - True Pundit\Erik Prince are the only ones referring to NYPD.
In all you’ve posted, only True Pundit has the NYPD story line. Anyone else who reports on it refers to True Pundit.
Nothing you provided shows differently. None of the non-True Pundit links you’ve provided mentions NYPD, except Info Wars and their report refers\links to the True Pundit report.
There is no evidence that NYPD seized the laptop, only True Pundit and Erik Prince’s word.
I provided to you the warrant showing Weiner voluntarily gave up his laptop to a private firm.
I went down this rabbit hole a long time ago and came to the conclusion I came to, based on the same type of research you are doing.
In all this time, I can find no NYPD warrant for a seizure of Weiner’s laptop and not one person from NYPD has come forward and verified their participation.
I hope you find something different, but I’m done looking for it.
You must be arguing that the NYPD did not get the laptop first they got it second hand or something. That could be possible. I’m infinitely more concerned about what is in the computer not who got it first, second or whatever. There is a very concentrated effort to keep the info contained within especially the 33k mails that Hillary bleach bit away from prying eyes.I think I know why.
Anyway, I was still impressed with the comments supposedly made by NYPD people about the content of the pedophila stuff contained on the computer.
I really don’t care who got it first or second if the data is good that’s my concern.
Also there is no telling how many copies of the laptop have been made at this point.