Posted on 07/25/2018 10:10:41 PM PDT by ransomnote
“Trust The Plan”
YouTube President Trump This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected (The Plan) - 6 min
YouTube Joe Masepoes Q - The Plan To Save The World - 13 min - popular introduction
YouTube Thoughts Not Bots Who is Q - 4 min - quick overview
Paul Serran What is Q? - 31 point introduction
Threadreader ImperatorRex A thread on how Team Trump is preparing the normies for what is coming: major Swamp Draining. - overview
Article Sundance Imagine You are Not a Politician, Yet You are Running For The Presidency - overview
Threadreader Jason Wright Q Anon Is Real - Oct, Nov 2017 Q drops + commentary
“Pay Attention” Thread Qanon.pub Q drops - created by Q on Q’s 8chan board
Website We-go-all.net Q drops and research - includes extensive resources and links
“The Truth Is Spreading” Thread Anonymous QProofs - compiled “proofs” that Q has trusted insider access to President Trump Oracles Bagster Oracle - warm and witty summaries of each day's thread Lexicon Swordmaker LexiQon - immense list of expanded acronyms and terms used by Q; invaluable reference “Power to the People” YouTube Praying Medic Series of videos explaining Q-drops Praying Medic Immediate reactions to Q-drops YouTube Dustin Nemos Series of videos identifying Q content - Well reasoned; excellent documentation links ImperatorRex Includes Q-drop reactions Thread SkyPilot Story of Q - collection of Q information “Silent Majority No More”
Website White House Email the White House with your support and suggestions Website Congress Email Congress with your support and suggestions Website roserambles.org Q Cards Thread Little Jeremiah Memes “Fight, Fight, Fight!” YouTube President Reagan A Time for Choosing - 3 min - 1964 speech set to Matthew Worth’s images YouTube President Kennedy The President and the Press - 20 min - 1961 speech on secret societies
I see something different happening.
The corrupt Republicans were outed and either withdrew from their races or resigned outright. The corrupt Democrats will be kept in place, and their corruption will be unveiled a week before the election for maximum effect.
I was thinking "behind the scenes". The Hollywood Renegade of a few days back made it clear that it wasn't just the visible actors that were diddling the kids on the set, but also the rest of the crew.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
On a positive note, one-by-one people at my office are coming up to me and admitting they are starting to appreciate Trump.
I never made a secret of my support for Trump--far from it--but I do not proselytize at work.
Just yesterday a lady, who is an Executive in the Sales Department, after we strategized on a deal, said: "You know, I'm starting to see how Trump is using his skills as a businessman."
She was impressed with the way he addressed the Iowa farmers' concerns about China tariffs by getting them a new, much better deal with the EU.
FWIW, I know she was anti-Trump last year.
I FREQUENTLY get these kinds of comments, both at work and in family/social life. (Church is already pro-Trump.) This is why I am so confident about 2020, and really, even 2018. (BIGGEST RISK: DS manages to trigger a stock market crash before the election. They will definitely try.)
I have read in detail a fair amount written about this alleged injustice. There are claims that IBM open sourced this patented information just in time for Facebook to put it into use. While this nefarious claim is certainly possible, to me it is more likely that Zuckerberg/ Facebook discovered the obvious details about the patent on their own and put it into use on Facebook, just like Gmail did. Give the nature of Facebooks approach to software development,I just dont feel that Facebook even looked at this IBM code. Too formal, without the geek factor of most open source code.
I dont see any contemporary discussion about Facebooks alleged complicity in this nefarious act. I see a discussion many years later about this violation. This behavior is typical of patent trolls who wait until many actors have violated the alleged claim, and then litigate these claims so that the accused find it easier to pay a settlement and fight it in court.
As I said, as a person in a directly related field, I do not find the patent novel or nonobvious. While I am no fan of Facebooks myriad of allegedly illegal activities, I just dont think that McKibbens account is an any way persuasive.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I greatly appreciate your explanation of the Gmail “tag.” I also appreciate your willingness to share your expertise and professional perspective regarding the McKibben case.
Is it possible that he really did have some original solutions to the problem, and that his patent lawyer cut him off at the knees with what you point out are extremely weak patent protections?
If so, my supposition is that from that point on he has no legs to stand on, to push the analogy. With loss of adequate legal/patent protections, it appears he’s out of luck getting any remuneration from a court.
If so, it is a terrible shame - if indeed he actually did have significant contributory ideas.
CDAN has posted blinds that indicate fieri might be a pedo.
Many journalists limit themselves to using only on-the-record sources in their stories. Even then, the rule of thumb is to get TWO on the record sources. The usual "anonymous source" cited by reporters is almost always better described as "a source who requested not being named". That means they know who the person is, but they aren't telling you, the reader.
You most famous anonymous source of the last 100 years is probably Deep Throat. He was unknown to us, but Woodward and Bernstein and Ben Bradley all knew who he was. Eventually, when he was an old man and his lawyer let the information out, they did tell us who he was.
Deep Throat: FBI Associate Director Mark Felt
So, even before you get to the owners of the media wanting to spike the story (and that happens too) you have the problem of a single source, who is also an unknown individual or group, posting in coded language, on a website famous for (among other things) pranks.
Imagine taking the story into your editor and trying to sell it.
That doesn't mean Q isn't real or legit, it means that he / they have positioned themselves in such a way that it is very difficult for the media to cover them.
If Q is what everyone says, then we have to assume this was deliberate. Q doesn't want reporters writing stories about him, he want's anons decoding his messages, he wants them to spread to secondary web sites, like Free Republic and Twitter and Gag and You Tube. And still the MSM can't really write about it except as "crazy conspiracy theory" because using their rules it has no basis in fact.
It comes down to the risk of credibility.
As an example Tucker Carlson reported the Mueller is giving Tony Podesta immunity, in the same time frame we knew that Mueller had asked for immunity for 5 witnesses in the Virginia case against him for tax evasion.
When the 5 names were revealed a few days after Tucker's reporting Podesta's name was not among them.
Tucker was subject to a huge amount of pummeling by other media for mis-reporting a story.
Tucker, in this case, may turn out to be right, because he is now claiming that the immunity was sought and granted in the Federal case in DC, not the case in Virginia.
Tucker Carlson's 'Scoop' About Tony Podesta's Immunity Was A Lie
Now, granted "Crooks and Liars" is not the ultimate authority on stuff, but this same line was all over the MSM.
If you are a reporter trying to make a living as a reporter the MSM is not your enemy, it's is your employer and all your future employers. A reporter only has their reputation to get them a job, if they destroy it reporting rumors from an unknown source posting on a cartoon related website -- they are not going to be very employable.
Even guys like Rush don't want to get caught up in something that doesn't pan out and have his accuracy impugned on account of it. There is no upside to reporting on it, and lots of downsides.
That's one reason I think keeping track of what HAS crossed over to the MSM is important.
So does Q. A month or so ago he posted a long post that was all links about "the Q phenomena" from various more-or-less mainstream sources.
Like I've said Q has to cross over the the MSM, or the phenomena that Q writes about have to become factually indisputable events.
The indictment of James A. Wolfe is such an immutable fact. So is the indictment of Clare Bronfman for money-laundering NIXVM cult money. We have to hope that there is more and more of those sorts of indictments coming down. Even they the MSM might not be reporting on Q, but they will sure be reading hm and reporting on the fruits from his tree.
WOW! how cool if he’s FReeper!
I wish that if indeed he did contribute to the breakthroughs on how to build a social media, he would have some kind of legal resource. I read that about the lawyer betrayal and that alone made me so righteously indignant on his behalf.
I’ve called the MSM “propaganda” for decades. You’re late to the party, but welcome. I’ve learned to stay away from fools, especially the MSM.
How many does Q think we need? There must be studies somewhere of how many people supported various movements. I thought I heard someone say that only 3% supported the American revolution.
What’s different this time?
Q is aiming for a non-violent overthrow of our oppressors.
The weapons of the Q army are not guns but information.
Jack, if you think an anonymous person cannot be an important source, you might want to check out the list of pseudonyms during the Constitutional debates, the most famous of which was probably Publius.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pseudonyms_used_in_the_American_Constitutional_debates
33% pro, 33% for the king, 33% neutral.
Yeah, I sure got around in those days.
Confirmed / Confirms / Confirmation
TXnMA
I don't know how much it is a percentage of the general population that is crucial . . . vs how many influencers are on Q's side. They are clearly related but far from identical measures.
Locally, we keep handing out cards and mostly getting decent responses. One yesterday got a bit stiff and showed signs of incredulity. Their loss.
tang-soo said:
Michaels claims are not just against Facebook but include IBMs development platform named Eclipse which uses collaboration and version control using a central database.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Now that’s interesting. So his involvement was with the pre-platform phase. (I’m sure I don’t have the correct termimology, but I think I understand what you are saying. And that squares with what he was saying he went to the lawyer about, if I recall correctly.
I thought Q warned of the possibility of a sharp market sell off back a ways? I dont think people in the market are going to let a crash affect their voting this time. Many investors are among the Woke, the rabble rousers dont invest and the elite market makers are irrelevant since theyre part of the problem.
If a crash/purge is big enough to take down institutions its probably going to coincide with POTUS going public and rallying the people to weather the event and win this.
Jack, I want to add this: I agree that Q per se is not useful as a “Source,” due to the factors you outlined.
But clearly, Q IS BIG NEWS, based upon tens of millions (or more) of followers all around the world; and, as an intrepid reporter could easily determine, both an unimaginable access to information (such as shots from airports around the world, Oval Office, obscure connections which prove absolutely on target etc.) for any private individual ... and, of course, many amazing instances where future has proved the past.
Then, after covering all that, an honest reporter (Ha! As-if) could certainly point out there are some apparent misses by Q, or at least assertions which have not been verified.
I repeat: Q, the Q phenomenon, the Q movement, the Q information drops are all HUGE, PERFECTLY VALID NEWS STORIES.
(Pinging Bags with this—our own intrepid newshound)
I’m not up to speed on all that. Is Michael the college friend/roommate of Zuch’s that he stole the FACEBOOK software and idea from?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.