Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Anybody, such as the woman in NYC who won the congressional primary last night, who are Democratic Socialists would more accurately be categorized as Bolsheviks while the standard Democrat corruptocrats such as Hillary, Terry McAuliffe, or Cuomo would best fit into the Menshevik Wing of the party.

I hope this disagreement does not cause me to feel the Wrath of Rush since he lives only about 40 miles up the road from me.

1 posted on 06/27/2018 10:27:44 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: PJ-Comix

I’m with you, PJ. This makes sense and could be part of the 1.02% (or whatever is the current sliver) of the time Rush is wrong.


2 posted on 06/27/2018 10:32:16 AM PDT by scottinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

I agree with your assessment of the Democrats.
The progressives are wearing R jerseys.

The progressives outnumber the constitutionalists in the elected GOP by a large percentage.
That has to change if the Republic is to survive.


3 posted on 06/27/2018 10:33:35 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

I think you’re right, but the thing is that most people wouldn’t even know what he was talking about if he said Bolsheviks and Mensheviks. I think he gets the essence of it with his terms, in a way that people will understand.

Maybe he needs to make more of a point about how the Dems - as a party - have turned more and more Marxist over the years.


4 posted on 06/27/2018 10:35:06 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Thinking about the rats that much makes my head hurt, just call ‘em commies.


7 posted on 06/27/2018 10:37:51 AM PDT by exnavy (America: love it or leave it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Vanity much? You could posted this on any number of existing threads.


8 posted on 06/27/2018 10:38:30 AM PDT by subterfuge (RIP T.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Rush has his, and he doesn’t want the hassle of being too cutting edge anymore.
I still like his show though.


9 posted on 06/27/2018 10:39:30 AM PDT by right way right (May we remain sober over mere men, for God really is our only true hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

This would be good to hear from Rush.

I used to think he was trying to keep things simple for the sake of expediance per on-air time.

He is not all-knowing. I forgive him;-)


10 posted on 06/27/2018 10:40:17 AM PDT by waterhill (I Shall Remain, in spite of __________.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
This is the characterization that I use, too. The Bolsheviks had a rule - “No enemies to the left.” It's corollary is that "all not as left as we are are our enemies." The Mensheviks, the SRs, the anarchists, and the national socialists were all insufficiently left and were destroyed. None understood the vicious nature of the Bolsheviks.
11 posted on 06/27/2018 10:40:49 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3666518/posts


12 posted on 06/27/2018 10:41:43 AM PDT by subterfuge (RIP T.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

You’re splitting hairs and calling Rush wrong for it. I don’t agree with you at all.

The Progressives of the early 1900’s were radicals. They were today’s liberals. Only the name changed.


14 posted on 06/27/2018 10:47:48 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
The donkeys have always been a split between Robin Hood and Santa Clause...now they've morphed into Pedophiles & Anarchists.
16 posted on 06/27/2018 10:48:04 AM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
It was when he labeled the Democrats as Radicals and Progressives.

For years I have resented Rush still calling them democrats instead of socialists, communists and American haters that have taken over that party. - Tom

18 posted on 06/27/2018 10:49:24 AM PDT by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

From the actions of the Left this is similar to the Stalinist vs. the Trotskyites. You have to wonder which were the worst.


19 posted on 06/27/2018 10:50:52 AM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

I’m old school so they’re Pinkos to me.


21 posted on 06/27/2018 10:52:45 AM PDT by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Definitely food for thought. We’ve seen this since probably 1972 in the Democrat party. It’s not enough to be sufficiently Democrat. One has to become Democrat in the “correct” way — at the moment — to advance to party leadership.

We also see signs of this overseas. In Germany, the traditional left (SPD) is disintegrating, and the traditional right (CDU/CSU) may dissolve their voting union over immigration.

Even so, the shift to the far left has IMO demonstrated more significance than anything that has happened on the right side of the political spectrum.


23 posted on 06/27/2018 10:58:19 AM PDT by Sam_Damon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

I had the same thought yesterday when he or Hannity mentioned Dems and Bolsheviks during their radio shows.


24 posted on 06/27/2018 11:20:30 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

“Progressive” is a name communists have often used to describe themselves.

In the US “progressives” were great admirers of big government and pushed for many socialist policies and programs.

Today “progressives” are also “radicals.” So using the two terms to try to differentiate the wings of the Democrat Party explains nothing. Your menshevik & bolshevik is a better analogy. Unfortunately, few know enough about Russian history for these terms to be easily understood.

The Democrats are split between the squeamish (menshevik) who want to impose socialism/communism via “peaceful” means (i.e., voters vote for the government to oppress everyone) and the unsqueamish (bolshevik) who are willing to openly advocate violence by non-government ideologues. Maxine Waters’ advocacy for mobs to physically assail political opponents is “bolshevik.” Pelosi urging Maxine to keep a lid on it is “menshevik.” The objective in either case is to establish tyranny by eradicating individual freedom.


25 posted on 06/27/2018 11:24:59 AM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
Bolshevik or Menshevik wings of the party

Like anyone knows what that means.

26 posted on 06/27/2018 11:28:46 AM PDT by donna (The United States Constitution and the Koran are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

I broke up with Rush when he did Chuck Schumer’s bidding behind the backs of his trusted audience (to whom he calls the guy Chuck U Schumer). And I disagree with both of you because the problem with our government is not ideological right now. I wish it were.

The true situation is that there is a globalist oligarchy attempting to run this and many other lands. They don’t have the USA and her people’s best interests in mind at all. They work only for their own wealth and power.

They own just about everyone in DC, regardless of “color of jersey.” It’s not about degree of left wing ideology. All ideologies are just used to achieve the ends of the globalists.

What you see yesterday in NY is a Sanders socialist beating out a member of the corrupt bought establishment Dems. Beating the globalist controlled propaganda media. It’s a sign of something good.

Rush of all people is missing the point: he always said we would win in a battle of ideologies and this is a step towards that battle. Watch these coming elections where obvious socialism will be head on cage matching with someone on the right. CA gov race, etc. The Dems will have to run on no borders etc. This is where we have a chance to expose the busy Gullibles to real constitutionalism and show them how freedom raises all boats. How can you be for socialism, an ideology that has ALWAYS FAILED (because it goes against human nature) over fairness and freedom for all? The oligarchy DOES NOT LIKE THIS ONE BIT. Gonna be a hot summer.


27 posted on 06/27/2018 11:41:08 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

On the first of every month, I send Levin, Hannity and Rush an email that says. They aren’t liberals or progressives so stop using those terms. Start using neo-communists.


28 posted on 06/27/2018 11:44:49 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson