Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops

qanon.pub ^ | 6/13/2018 | FReepers, Vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump

[bagster]

Now that I’ve totally derailed this thread...

Oh no. You never derailed the thread. You, and others, brought us back from the brink. For further information, see tonight's upcoming addition of the Oracle.

You done great, goodman. At the risk of sounding patronizing, I personally want to thank you (and those others) for the much needed morale boost after a trying day.

Bagster

[KitJ]

A very quick update from the House of Chan. General atmospherics, I’m not posting any links or highlighting any particular post. I confess its really late in mountain time and Kit has stayed up far past Retreat.

o The chan was violently angry and impatient following the release of the IG report today. Many calling on Q Team to drop the hammer and get the job done.

o A couple thousand posts later, calmer heads prevailed with the message that Q Team TOLD us that we would see a watered down report. Duh. More to follow.

o [adult content] One anon pointed out that Huma’s Muslim Brotherhood mother is a big proponent of female genital mutilation, aka clitorectomies, so make of that what you will when considering her relationship with Congressman Weiner.

o Reportedly, Dems are saying that any use of this report to undermine the Meuller investigation is bad. They never thought we would read past the headlines, I guess.

o As Q Team told us, the shills are out in force and being smacked down like Putin swinging a club against a baby seal.

o Agents other than Page and Strzok were amorous and texting fools. Never Trumpers are apparently present elsewhere in the bureau. The IG caught numerous conversations traded on texts to illustrate this.

o Trey Gowdy’s right index finger had a bandage on it during his Fox interview tonight. What’s up with that?

o [adult content] Shills are posting an old picture of Ivanka with a nipple slip. Didn’t know there was one until the clowns showed up. You can find it on the interwebs if you’re interested.

o NXIVM related. Do some digging on this guy: “A guy named Benjamin Szemkus says he went to party with Raniere, Allison Mack, Stormy Daniels, Eric Schniederman, Anthony Weiner & Huma Abedin”. That’s odd.

No real red meat tonight except the Szemkus fellow. I don’t know where that will go.

Best insult? [adult content] I’m afraid you’ll have to PM me on that one. I don’t want to risk losing this post.

FReeQ on!
Kit

[bagster]

OR I am full of it and know nothing at all.

You know nothing, No Doll Snow.

Wear it like armor, it can never be used to hurt you.

Bagster

[bagster]

o Trey Gowdy’s right index finger had a bandage on it during his Fox interview tonight. What’s up with that?

Oh, my. I remember some talk about bandages on index fingers a while back. And it wasn't good. That's not my area of expertise, but it is noteworthy if true.

p.s. ThankQ for the report.

Bagster

[bagster]

Shills are posting an old picture of Ivanka with a nipple slip.

See? Shills aren't all bad.

Wait. I mean, THAT'S TERRIBLE!!! Those bastards!! How dare they!!

Bagster

[bagster]

Hey Kit. I don't know if you do ping lists, but if you do and plan on making the House of Chan report a regular thing, would you mind putting me on your ping list for those? I don't wanna miss a one. That's some good interagency stuff right there.

Maybe you should petition the Mother of Dragons for an ambassadorship. We need some good ones.

Bagster

[meadsjn]

I just noticed something. The ladies here seem to pick up on the cloak & dagger relationships and adversaries much better than some of the men do.

Now that I think about it, that's the way it usually works.

[pa_dweller]

The conversation, which lasted around 20 minutes, was “primarily social,” Lynch said.

So, what were the parts that weren't 'primarily social' about? Hmmm?

[MagnoliaB]

“An a** kicking to the end attitude is just what everyone needs. Your comments are inspiring.”

Awwwww.....you’re making me blush. ;) I’ll quit when I’m dead.

[pa_dweller]

Timeout for a grammar police moment.

illicit - not legally permitted or authorized; unlicensed; unlawful. Also, disapproved of or not permitted for moral or ethical reasons.

elicit - to draw or bring out or forth; educe; evoke: to elicit the truth; to elicit a response with a question.

See the difference? I know it's off-topic but this kind of thing irks my ilk.

[SkyPilot]

New revelations on the contents of that laptop, according to law enforcement sources, implicate the Democratic presidential candidate, her subordinates, and even select elected officials in far more alleged serious crimes than mishandling classified and top secret emails, sources said. NYPD sources said these new emails include evidence linking Clinton herself and associates to: Money laundering Child exploitation Sex crimes with minors (children) Perjury Pay to play through Clinton Foundation Obstruction of justice Other felony crimes

Thanks. Yes, I know. We have known this since October 2016.

And here, we are, June 15th, 2018. Almost 2 years later. We had a DOJ IG report released yesterday that took months and over 500 investigators to compile.

And it whitewashed pretty much everything you mentioned, besides some passing references. There was no direct connection to those involved, no hard evidence mentioned from the horrible things the NYPD discovered on that laptop......nothing.

A whitewash and a massive cover up.

We also must remember this in context: probably about 95-98% of the American people have zero to little knowledge of what we discuss here regarding the crimes of the Deep State, Obama, Hillary, et all.

And the swamp is succeeding (so far) in keeping it that way.

[mkmensinger]

I must be of the same ilk. My pet grammar peeve is the use of “to” when “too” is indicated. Whine finished.

[bagster]

$~~~THE BAGSTER ORACLE~~~$

It was a very big day in FReeQtown. The long anticipated OIG report was released to the public. As expected, there was a reaction among the masses, both here and throughout social media and the MSM-13. Q made one post in response.

Here are some of the top stories the Oracle is following.

~~~ The reporters following the girth of Jerome Corsi were pulled off due to this being such an important news day. We can only assume that Corsi is still fat.

~~~The New York Attorney General wished President Donald J. Trump a happy birthday with a lawsuit against the Trump Foundation. No doubt this news was dropped today in anticipation of the IG report. The ARM/MSM-13/Deep State is nothing if not predictable. This, like the Russia collusion hoax, is a nothingburger and a desperation move.

~~~ Last night's Q pic of the plane and the SS car continued to be discussed and further details, as well as alternative readings emerged.

After some analysis, not only was a man with a beard in the driver's seat and a female in the passenger seat identified (well, not identified, but you get it), and the top of what appeared to be a man's cranium was seen in the reflection in the rear view mirror.

FReeQ Pocketdoor claimed that the plane was not a United Airlines commercial plane, but a U.S. Navy C-40 Clipper. He identified it by it's markings and spoke with some authority. If true, this lends credence to any theories that the plane may have contained a government witness under protection or maybe even somebody in government custody.

Others claim that, according to the "Q clock" this may have something to do with Ruth Bader Ginsburg (RBD) (meeting with James Brennan regarding the Scalia seat [187]. That theory seems far=fetched to the Oracle, but there it is.

(Let it be noted that the Oracle is not a member of the Clock sect of Q nation, but it bears reportage.)

~~~ Now, an overview and brief analysis of the OIG report release. It would appear that Q was right and that the modified/redacted [RR] version of the report was released to the public, with confidential attachments released to Congress and Law Enforcement attachments withheld (if I have that right.)

~~~ Upon release, certain media reports were rushed to press and the lamentations of our women AND men began to rise. The general FR population went on the warpath and even the streets of FReeQtown and social media ran with blood. Reports came in that the nerds of 8chan were in a panic and ready to rise up. The anger was palpable and unmanageable. Even some of our most stout-hearted FReeQs seemed to have lost hope.

~~~ Anti-Q activist Jack Black created an FR thread which was overwhelmed by Anti-Q/Anti-Sessions activists. JB explained to them our reaction and reported to them our "mood" and that some of us were ready to turn our backs on Q and give up. He created a link there to the Q thread and invited the wailing giver-uppers to come and "check us out."

Shortly thereafter, we were inundated by a small batallion of Anti-Q activist trolls and the battle ensued.

~~~ As the night wore on, and details from the report filtered out, the people calmed. One by one, stalwart FReeQs stood up and spoke. They spoke of hope. They spoke of valiant battle and victories to come. Our own Mother of Dragons came forth among us and raised her voice. Some of the more notable FReeQs who rose to speak were KitJ, Lyby, Melian, CJ Wolf and Jocko Manning.

These bold patriots never lost heart and they rallied the dejected troops. As, one by one, these stalwarts raised voice, spirits began to lift and you could feel a change in the air. Before long, things were back to normal.

I have listed a few of the strong FReeQS, but the list is long. You know who you are. The Oracle wants you all to know how valuable your contributions this day were to the movement, the cause, and America. If Q were watching, he would be proud. You stood tall against the squall. Here is footage taken in the midst of our darkest hour.

Do you hear the people sing.

~~~ The OIG Report (Redacted and modified)

~~~ The report itself calls for little interpretation. This was, as Q pointed out, the whitewashed RR version. It was rife with tales of political bias by identified and unidentified agents tweets, emails, and instant messages on both private and company devices expressing hatred for Trump and support for Clinton.

A new Strzok/Page tweet was revealed that had Strzok responding to Page that "they" would not let Trump win the election.

There were findings that many agents accepted bribes from the media in return for illegal leaks.

After all that, and more, the summary of the report said that, while mistakes were made, no evidence of political bias was found that any FBI personnel action was colored by political bias.

The Office of the IG recommended that the FBI "consider" several "fixes" including training and banners on cellphones and computers reminding them not to be naughty.

The Oracle finds those findings and recommendations ridiculous. We believe that when the unredacted/unmodified facts are presented and compared to this report (maybe at Monday's Senate hearing?) then RR is doomed, as Q has indicated.

It appears that, with this report, RR and the Deepies are attempting to wall off the damage to the FBI and a few disposable individuals. He (they) are protecting the Obama DOJ, himself, and any connection to the Obama administration, Hillary, and Obama himself.

But there are voices that, later in the night, are starting the "snowball" that Q will speak of in this evening's post. Devin Nunez has said in interviews that the report has opened the can of worms on the Weiner laptop/Hillary Clinton child sex scandal and that now that is no longer confidential and can be investigated.

Other voices in media and social media are piping up that the report is not the "nothingburger" that the left media came out of the gate with.

The Oracle thinks the plan is working as intended. Trust the plan.

And this is what Q had to say about the report.

#1499- Q posted a tweet from The Donald dated June 5, 2018. The tweet talked about the delay in the IG report on Crooked Hillary and Slippery James Comey. He hoped that the report was not being changed or made weaker and called for transparency, saying the people have a right to know.

Q then reposted a previous Q post #1433 from 5-21-18.

May 21 2018
1433

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 622a94 No.1497716 📁
May 21 2018 18:04:49 (EST)

Military OP.
[Green]
General K [JFK]
Full Disclosure.
General Statement:
Once the 'extremely guarded & highly classified'

information is finally revealed to House investigators,
DNI, public etc., RR must recuse or forcefully terminated.
[RR] problems.
What was RR's Senate Conf Vote?
WRAY reports to RR [important fact].
Who do you TRUST?
[RR] recuse/fired who has direct oversight of Mueller?
Sessions un-recuse or #3 [until refill]?
Who is Rachel Brand?
Why was Rachel Brand dismissed?
Think timing.

"The succession question is actually a bit complicated. By default, under an obscure statute known as the the Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, Brand’s temporary successor as the “acting” associate attorney general is her principal deputy, Jesse Panuccio. That same statute would also allow the president to choose someone else to serve as the “acting” AAG on a temporary basis for up to 210 days; the pool of individuals from which the president could draw in this case includes individuals already holding Senate-confirmed positions elsewhere in the executive branch (like EPA administrator Scott Pruitt) or senior civil service lawyers in the Justice Department, specifically." "Acting"

https://www.justice.gov/asg📁

When does the clock run out?
Why is Schneiderman's removal 'extremely' relevant?
TRUST (name).
These people are stupid.
D5.
Q

------------------

Q then writes;

[[RR]] approved/signed FISA-warrant application(s) to extend surveillance on POTUS/others.
What evidence to support?
Snowball.
[[RR]] @ WH.
Why was Rachel Brand removed?
Critical thinking.
Q

The relevant part of the reposts is in regards to RR's removal through firing or recusal and the succession in the Attorny General's Office to replace him.

Q refers in today's post to RR's participation in the FISA court debacle and leads us to believe that will be his undoing and that events may be "snowballing" in a D5 event that will result in RR's removal.

The Oracle hopes that we don't have to wait until the FISA/Spygate section of the IG report is released to take down RR, but we are willing to trust the plan with patience despite the howling of the weak and the gnashing of their teeth.

And that is all, sportsfans, on this frantic night. See ya round the popsicle stand. Same Q time. Same Q channel.

The Oracle leaves you with this ditty from the post- hysteria secret underground FReeQ meeting that took place in an undisclosed location. FReeQ KitJ stood up to lead us. (here's that bad link, kit.)

It is time for us all to decide who we are.

Bagster

[LiveFreeOrDie2001]

YES! The Bagster Oracle!!

Clearest, most concise & highest detailed summary of “anything” on the Internet.

Nothing goes better every morning w/my 3rd big mug of strong Coffee.

[bagster]

The ladies here seem to pick up on the cloak & dagger relationships and adversaries much better than some of the men do.

I'll respond to that with a theory (I don't mind getting yelled at.)

There is, at times, a certain hesitancy by some men and they tend to be less aggressive in social situations like this than they would be normally in deference to the ladies. While the ladies are free to behave as aggressively or passively as they choose. We men want to appear civilized while seeking women's approval.

I think it's nature's way. Either that, or a sign of the times. Or a combination of both.

Hold your fire, ladies. I'm only talking about science.

Besides, I'm acknowledging your natural power. Of course, some of us more rebellious types won't be contained.

Bagster

[bagster]

So, what were the parts that weren't 'primarily social' about? Hmmm?

Ya, I picked up on that too. Of course, nobody would ever dare to ask her. Ain't these legal types slippery?

Bagster

[bagster]

this kind of thing irks my ilk.

You said ilk.

I'm offended.

Bagster

[bagster]

Oh. Magnolia you stood tall today. Bagster was watching. I apologize for not recognizing your fierceness in the Oracle. Let heap praise on you now. I was espcecially proud of you on that other thread when you and bitt were surrounded by hostiles.

Bagster

[bagster]

:)

ThankQ kindly, goodman.

Bagster

[smileyface]

The motive of anyone who pops up on a Q thread at this late date and sh**s all over it is very, very suspect.

---

I concur. Especially one that is sooo concerned that they copy JimRob in the posting...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3663027/posts?page=291#291