Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Earth's Magnetic Field Might Not Flip After All
Live Science ^ | April 30, 2018 03:35pm ET | Stephanie Pappas,

Posted on 05/01/2018 8:06:25 AM PDT by BenLurkin

In a study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences today (April 30), researchers ... found that today's patterns don't resemble the two most extreme disruptions in the past 50,000 years, when the magnetic field nearly reversed. [7 Ways the Earth Changes in the Blink of an Eye]

Instead, the modern field appears similar to the field during two other periods — one 49,000 ago, and one 46,000 years ago — when the field wobbled but didn't flip-flop.

... Currently, magnetic north is very close to the North Pole, while magnetic south is near the South Pole. That's been the case for about 780,000 years — the last time the geomagnetic field underwent a complete reversal, with magnetic north and south swapping places. But the field has been weakening by about 5 percent per century since direct observations started in 1840, and indirect observations hint that this weakening might have been going on for at least 2,000 years, Maxwell Brown, who studies paleomagnetism at the University of Iceland, and his colleagues wrote in their new paper. A particularly weak area called the South Atlantic Anomaly, which stretches from South Africa to Chile, has been pinpointed as a potential ground zero for a global polarity reversal.

Brown and his colleagues wanted to compare today's conditions with the magnetic field of years past. They focused on two "excursions," which are major disruptions of the geomagnetic field that don't necessarily involve a global reversal of magnetic north and south. One, the Laschamp excursion, occurred about 41,000 years ago. During that excursion, the magnetic field was a complex muddle without a clear magnetic north and south. The other, the Mono Lake excursion, happened about 34,000 years ago and was marked by a very weak magnetic north and south.

(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; geomagneticreversal; gps; magneticfield; magnetism; poleshift; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 05/01/2018 8:06:25 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

More winning!


2 posted on 05/01/2018 8:08:53 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

So its safe to leave my bunker?


3 posted on 05/01/2018 8:09:00 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Well, that’s a relief.


4 posted on 05/01/2018 8:09:53 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

awwwww but I was promised an apocalypse...


5 posted on 05/01/2018 8:10:10 AM PDT by GraceG ("Trust, But Verify the Plan!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Yay! We’re not all gonna die after all.


6 posted on 05/01/2018 8:12:21 AM PDT by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

Yes, but only for brief periods of time.


7 posted on 05/01/2018 8:12:45 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Sounds to me like not flipping is worse. Flipping would mean a strong field, but in the opposite direction. Not flipping means little or no field at all and we’re all fried by cosmic rays and UV.


8 posted on 05/01/2018 8:12:55 AM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

When’s the last time you used a compass?
Just curious.
Even if you did use them, and the poles switched, how hard would it be to find the new north? Would you need a decoder ring when the S points where the N used to be? lol


9 posted on 05/01/2018 8:14:50 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Whew. One less thing to prep for.


10 posted on 05/01/2018 8:17:23 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

You’ll know the poles flipped when you come home and see a bunch of paper around the floor of your refrigerator and all the magnets picture side in.


11 posted on 05/01/2018 8:22:46 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z3n

Our magnetic field does a lot more than just give us directions. We would fry without it.


12 posted on 05/01/2018 8:28:23 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: z3n

Animals also rely on the magnetic field.


13 posted on 05/01/2018 8:34:04 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

Dummy! They would be upside down.


14 posted on 05/01/2018 8:36:31 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Why Monkeys Might Not Come Out Of My Butt After All.


15 posted on 05/01/2018 8:38:23 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
"Our magnetic field does a lot more than just give us directions. We would fry without it"
~~~~
Fry?
:0
That sounds serious.
Granted, I guess there would be a lull in the field's shielding effects while it was shifting, but in my limited knowledge of magnetic fields, I don't think they can shut down if they dynamic forces that are causing them are still present. In other words, just because poles drift or even switch, it doesn't mean we are completely devoid of a field.


~~~~
"Animals also rely on the magnetic field."
~~~~

16 posted on 05/01/2018 8:46:02 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: z3n

The lull could be a thousand years.


17 posted on 05/01/2018 8:51:11 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: z3n

I tried the map and didn’t get to the finish lol.


18 posted on 05/01/2018 8:54:38 AM PDT by BillyCuccio (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

“The lull could be a thousand years.”
~~~
Could be.
But I doubt it.
I’m no rocket scientist. Okay. But if the earth is still spinning (once a day) and it still has that iron core, it seems like the forces are still in place to generate that field.

No, something tells me that the ‘lull’ that are showing in minerals or where every they measure the magentic field in the past are a spot phenomenon. So yeah, just because the iron in some magma at a specific position on the globe didn’t get influenced in a north-south orientation for 50 years only means that the field wasn’t generating unified polarity and position over that time. It doesn’t mean the field stopped existing.


19 posted on 05/01/2018 8:57:09 AM PDT by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

“Flipping would mean a strong field”

During the Laschamp event 41000 years ago the reversal lasted over 400 years at a 25% normal strength.

During the transition of several hundred years it was at 5%.


20 posted on 05/01/2018 8:58:45 AM PDT by TexasGator (Z1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson