Posted on 04/25/2018 8:09:04 PM PDT by Signalman
From the “law of unintended consequences” department comes this finding, suggesting that the push for eco-friendly energy savings may be doing more harm to us than good.
Study links night exposure to blue light with breast and prostate cancer
Researchers used images taken by astronauts to evaluate outdoor lighting in Madrid and Barcelona
A study performed by an international team led by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), a centre supported by the “la Caixa” Foundation, reports a link between exposure to blue light at night and higher risk of developing breast and prostate cancer. Blue light is a range of the visible light spectrum emitted by most white LEDs and many tablet and phone screens. The results have been published in Environmental Health Perspectives.
“WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified night shift work as probably carcinogenic to humans. There is evidence pointing to an association between exposure to artificial light at night, disruption of the circadian rhythm, and breast and prostate cancers. With this study we sought to determine whether night exposure to light in cities can affect the development of these two types of cancer”, explains Manolis Kogevinas, ISGlobal researcher and coordinator of the study. “We know that depending on its intensity and wave length, artificial light, particularly in the blue spectrum, can decrease melatonin production and secretion”, says Martin Aubé, physics professor at CÉGEP in Sherbrooke, Canada and study co-author.
The study was conducted within the framework of the MCC-Spain project cofunded by the ‘Consorcio de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública’ (CIBERESP), and includes medical and epidemiological data of more than 4,000 people between 20 and 85 years of age in 11 Spanish regions. Indoor exposure to artificial light was determined through personal questionnaires, while outdoor levels of artificial light were evaluated for Madrid and Barcelona, based on nocturnal images taken by astronauts aboard the International Space Station.
Results obtained for both cities show that participants exposed to higher levels of blue light had a 1.5 and 2-fold higher risk of developing breast and prostate cancer, respectively, as compared to the less-exposed population.
Ariadna García, ISGlobal researcher and first author of the study, says: “Given the ubiquity of artificial light at night, determining whether it increases or not the risk of cancer is a public health issue”. At this point, further studies should include more individual data using for instance light sensors that allow measuring indoor light levels. It would also be important to do this kind of research in young people that extensively use blue light emitting screens”.
“Currently, the images taken by the astronauts on the Space Station are our only way of determining the colour of outdoor lighting at a large scale, and the spread of blue light-emitting white LEDs in our cities”, comments Alejandro Sánchez de Miguel, scientist at the Astrophysics Institute in Andalucía-CSIC and Exeter University.
That whole LED thing had the stench of deep state all over it when it first came out.
I have a little, LED night-light. When it is on and the ceiling fan is on I can watch the blades as the LED strobes the blades. I’m assuming that it is strobing at 60 Hertz. I also have to assume that the strobing can harm the eyes but internal organs? Give me a break!
I’m not too hot on prostate cancer, and I still have a lot of incandescent bulbs. They may cost more to operate...but now it seems worth it - I’ll keep using them, probably until I’m gone.
“That whole LED thing had the stench of deep state all over it when it first came out.”
I agree...it was silly when it started and it is still silly. I’ll stick with REAL lighting.;
” I’m quite sure that they weren’t exposed to LED lighting, or processed foods.”
Or SUVs.
The bad news:
Death of my body is certain.
"Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:" (Rom 5:12 AV).
But there is some good news:
Though my body dies, I can get a new body to live in.
"Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life
by Jesus Christ our Lord" (Rom 5:20,21 AV).
It's fr-r-e-e-e, mon, it's fr-r-e-e-e!
You just have to agree to His terms, that's all. He does the rest!
It’s all that electromagnetic energy that we are emitting. Then there is CO2. Don’t forget GMOs and chem trails. And the UFOs are conspiring with Bigfoot and the Lock Nes Monster.
Interesting.
Melatonin is an extremely important hormone in the body. Among its effects is to act as an antioxidant and protect against cancer. Another effect is to regulate the sleep/wake cycle.
So I am not surprised that the reduction in use of friendly warm incandescent bulbs seems to be resulting in higher cancer fates. I wouldn’t be surprised if further research shows other adverse health effects.
Personally, I hate artificial light, especially those bluish light sources. The moment they illuminate, I feel a wave of depression—they really do make me feel horrible. So I have not been very happy with the ill-conceived mandates to phase out incandescent bulbs. And I really do not think that I am the only person who finds bluish light sources depressing.
Hopefully, more studies like this will be forthcoming, with a resulting return to friendlier yellowish light sources. Meanwhile, I will continue to read by the light of my 30-something year old incandescent light bulb that I use daily.
The same blue light is present in SUNLIGHT! are they going to even let their stupid minds think about that? or are they so fixated on finding cancer in man-made things that they can’t think straight?
(yes)
I prefer the "warm white" LEDs, which have a lower blue component.
“it was silly when it started and it is still silly. I’ll stick with REAL lighting”
Ditto for the “earth-saving” low-flow toilet.
A great episode of “Last Man Standing” was when Tim Allen and his neighbor went underground to the black market to buy incandescent bulbs.
I worked in “the unemployment office” for years and years. A lot of people cannot handle third-shift work (overnight). From what I have read and seen, the best approach is to have a stable sleep pattern. But almost all 3rd shift workers I have dealt with switch their schedules to “normal” on weekends and time off. Who wants to be up in the middle of the night on your day off when everybody else is sleeping? I think it’s the constant switching of sleep schedules that causes the problems.
The worst are the employers who require workers to rotate shifts every couple of weeks or even more frequently. I asked one of them why and he said, “Everyone would fight to be on first shift if we didn’t make them rotate.” My idea of paying first shift workers less and third shift workers more did not compute with him.
Yawn.
Well, I'm sure that you've heard the old adage: "They're blowing smoke up your @$$"?
This is the updated version: "They're shining a blue light up your @$$"...
Life is dangerous.
I posit the true link is that people who work nigh shifts tend to smoke more and engage in other behaviors that others do not, like drinking vodka straight from the bottle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.