Posted on 03/22/2018 6:22:46 PM PDT by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. Its to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. Ill put the link to their general Youtube channel here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following links. The different websites hosting Q drops don't function the same for everyone. I hope you will find a site that works for you:
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3640719/posts?page=19#19
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
For those who would like to find out what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
I think the following video provides a "big picture" view of why "the storm" is necessary.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
I've worked with the Army Corp of Engineers in the past. They are a great organization, but I cannot fathom them being involved in anything remotely related to the Storm, Q, and this current Deep State battle. They are in the business of public engineering, design, and construction: they are not combat oriented. It is an organization that is 98% civilian! Only 2% are military. And people here on FR generally despise Federal civil servants.
Now suddenly they are the Savior the Storm?
I just can't get there from here.
LOL! Lost on the Pagans I am afraid!
Pres. Trump speaks truth.
It was not a bill (House), but a suggestion, which funds
the border wall through the Army Engineers.
Covfefe.
I have no recollection of a scene where a mother gives up her 12 y/o daughter to a doctor.
That is simply, totally, and utterly untrue.
What the Congress has not done is follow the budgeting process since 2009 in a timely manner, e.g. a budget resolution then the subcommittees pass the 11 appropriations bills (or whatever the number) and then a full up vote by the full appropriations committees and then the House and then the Senate and then reconciliation and then to the President, all done before the close of a fiscal year for the next fiscal year.
But that is far from saying there are no rules. Continuing resolutions are simply laws that extend an in force appropriation law for a number of additional months with all the rules of the original appropriation PLUS all the rules contained in the CR. An Omnibus is full of rules and laws as well. It is just one humongous bill rather than 11 sepearate bills.
BUT THERE ARE RULES AND THERE IS LAW. It's a mess and Cpngress should do its job properly, but no one has assumed extra-constitutional authorities in this process.
The omnibus bill is the budget until the end of FY18 (Sep 30th). There are not two bills. I don't know where people are getting these ideas.
Omnibus bills are routine, and used to package together the budgets of all Federal departments and agencies into an omnibus spending bill.
Moreover, the omnibus bill specifically prohibits construction of the wall, and it doesn't matter if it was the Army Corps of Engineers, DHS, or any other agency or department that tried to do so. It is illegal under the law the President just signed (and yes, the omnibus is now law).
I’m like you..I think it is a game of moves. He’s surrounded by military...
I always mute deadcat....so annoying
That is not correct. No new border wall construction can occur under the omnibus, which is now law.
The Army Corps of Engineers fall under DoD, and the Dod is prohibited, by law, in this legislation of construction any new border wall. All they can do is repair existing fencing.
It's in the bill. If Trump tried to go around the very law he just signed, it is an impeachable offense (for real).
What part of hiring 100K civvies, basic’ing them in the COE building the wall while training for their best-fit position in their chosen new branch after a year, producing near-instant readiness, don’t you like?
I have no recollection of a scene where a mother gives up her 12 y/o daughter to a doctor.
I ignore them...they will always be wringing their hands and in a hissy fit with worry. There are doers and their are just plain worriers. Its their choice..fight or hide in the corner.
I think something dramatic will happen over the weekend, but it will happen largely out of sight of the public.
The Stand
Best book ever
M O O N
OTOH, if I view the “Stage_5:5[y]” line as “ready to dish dirt,” the two castles may be white hat assets who can do the dishing.
>>701978
USMC activated.
US (3).
Q
The (3) is called an occur in cobol, and means ‘occurs three times’ which to a coder means there are three homogenous Marine sets activated for something. You really don’t realize how much coding resembles sigint dialect until you see Q speaking it.
See this section of texokie’s #977;—when was this q drop?—
“10 days.
Darnkess.
War.
Good v. Evil.
Roadmap of big picture is here.
Review post happenings.
Clarified.
Crumbs not only for /pol/.”
Note the word:
Darnkess
The “n” and “k” are reversed, to read nk. NK = North Korea.
Heard of wiggle room? We see all the time how laws can be interpreted and if anyone has the BEST ARMY of Lawyers, its our President and so many have just joined his fight.
If 2200 people got involved each one would only have to read one page...
I didn't read the entire 2,232 page bill, and I am not sure what you are talking about.
Here is the PDF of the entire bill that is now law (because President Trump signed it):
http://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20180319/BILLS-115SAHR1625-RCP115-66.pdf
Multiple new reports, and multiple GOP House and Senate members have confirmed that this bill prohibits contruction of the border wall.
Here's another:
That's it.
No agency, including the Army Corps of Engineers, ain't building the wall. Not under the guise of training, a flood plain,or anything else.
Some fencing repair, and some new "barriers" for 33 miles.
No more.
Yeah, with syntax all over the map.
The parenthetical is also a convention used in algebra/math, and can have the same "times three" function.
It can also be used to designate a sub-part, rather than multiples.
I see two lines ... "USMC activated" then separately, "US (3)"
If we follow your convention strictly, which is what the computer will do, it is not USMC times three, it is US times three.
I figure Q, while insisting all of the syntax has explicit meaning and every single character is chosen carefully with all of history and all of future in mind, is not exactly that careful and consistent. Q is also dealing with a form of war, where predictions and outcomes are uncertain. All that as prelude to our decoding chore being more complicated, because the rules of syntax and construction aren't strict.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.