Q Anon: (3/9/18) Continued from Wednesday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration

https://qanon.pub ^ | 3/9/2018 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3637830/posts

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg

The following link displays President Trump's tweets and Q Anon drops in one table in chronological order:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at the following link:

http://qanonmap.github.io

Some people have difficulty accessing that Q drop page and prefer to use the following link:
http://www.we-go-all.com/

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize acronym into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3637271/posts?page=5#5

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

[zzeeman]

The example that I gave before was from examining the posts in context on the 8 chan qresearch board. You can still ascertain some of the context if you want to avoid going there, and just examine them on one of the aggregator sites.

The diagram below illustrates how.

In the above example you can see:
- Post #905 is composed of two parts: the random anon's post (# 605232), and Q's reply (# 605255)
- the random anon's post (# 605232) was in response to Q's post (# 605197) that we saw in #903
- so we can see that the random anon was guessing that Q's "Twitter rec 24D." meant "Twatter in receivership in 24 days?"

Note: if you don't at least go and examine them on one of the aggregator sites, it is very hard to get the context from posts that are copied into our threads. Depending on how they are copied in, it is sometimes impossible to even see the difference from what is an actual Q post, versus a post of a random Anon that he is responding to.

Does that help make it more clear?

[TEXOKIE]

Thanks bagster. I’ll tell Darlin you said so! We’ll hold off on building that for now.

[Keyhopper]

Mostly coca cola and shakes

[TEXOKIE]

Thanks for the link, No_Doll_i

[Aquamarine]

Reprobate.

[rx]

Who's his real mama?

The MSM has long been able to twist and deflect elements of BHO's ineligibility and usurpation of the presidency, by saying to the American electorate, in effect, "You have the burden to prove Obama (and the MSM) wrong!" Or, as in this reflection of that idea, "Go ahead, take a stab at who you believe his mother is!

The original "Birther" messages were, by contrast, entirely reasonable and rightful:
"BHO has never provided any reliable birth record!
He's paid lawyers large sums to keep hidden and sealed his historical birth, school and legislative documents.
His Social Security and Draft Registration both appear to be false.

Those ideas Obama's sycophants have been able to twist and turn into "Birthers don't believe BHO was born in Hawaii, despite what the Hawaii Department of Health has said."

As soon as a so-called "birther" gets identified, the MSM attitude goes to ridicule, suggesting, "Those are the "bats*it crazies" that don't believe Barack was born in Hawaii."

The Ministry of Smoke and Mirrors has turned thoughtful human beings into unthinking knee-jerk reactionaries (Operation Mockingbird) by the scores of millions.   BHO's eligibility for the presidency was made to appear to be a question of "belief" among people that supposedly can't handle the truth, but instead veer off into the realm of "conspiracy theories."

There are nonetheless scores of millions who can still think. Those base their understandings and opinions on evidence, facts and reason and don't have to be plugged into a CNN talking head's program to allow their brains to be imprinted with what to think. And they're not afraid of Fake News Generators that regularly use the politically incorrect "conspiracy theorist" moniker to convey to their unthinking masses who should be hated, beaten down and personally discredited if not destroyed.

If there's anything that's become patently clear in recent decades, it's how audaciously large and complex the Deep State manages to make its conspiracies, most often without being sufficiently discovered to wake up our government functionaries via petitions (which never should have been necessary if the functionaries could be counted on to do their jobs using normal diligence) from a critical mass of the citizenry to finally allow for investigations, leaving aside for the moment, hoped-for firings and punishments. Go Trump, MAGA!

Even though Obama eventually dropped $10 to get a copy or two of what was purported to be his Long Form Birth Certificate (LFBC) as an alternative to paying his lawyers millions (Hmmmm.) to fight legal battles surrounding his birth documentation, millions of dollars were later extracted from a clearly-not-responsible aircraft engine manufacturer (conveniently foreign, Pratt & Whitney Canada, whose main competition has been from General Electric, run by Jeff Immelt, Chairman during that time, of Obama's Jobs and Opportunities Council) and its shareholders to redistribute that income to HDOH Director Loretta Fuddy's family for Fuddy's lied-about, ostensible death. Her Deputy Director apparently believed he should be compensated for having to watch her die, even though she didn't really die. (One wonders what representations were made by whom in those lawsuits!)

Fuddy got to retire to Valhalla because she'd been a good and faithful clown. More importantly, perhaps, she knew who the actual forgers of BHO's LFBC were, so had a reason to remain useful, since those forgers left breadcrumbs in the documents and elsewhere to prove forgery, in case anyone should try to come after them as forgers, since they were merely told what to do, on pain of the potential to lose their professional careers and pensions.

Although there were several conspiracies involved with this set of hoaxes, the biggest one is surely BHO's usurpation of the US Government, which was not his accomplishment at all, but rather that of his handlers in the Deep State, for they wanted to reshape the Middle East (Think Arab Spring, Benghazi Gun Running, etc.) and bring about the New World Order as quickly as they could while he was just an empty suit that had never run a lemonade stand.

[meyer]

“”She’s a god to too many lobotomized sheeple. The god MUST be brutally exposed, imho.””

Yes, she is! Including family members that should know better!

[TEXOKIE]

Thanks fatima

[Keyhopper]

Wow, the American people now own Google and Twitter?

[little jeremiah]

I appreciate everyone’s comments, ideas, speculations and detective work. Yours included. I just realized I could have read more and my question appeared to be already answered.

Of course, Q statements or words sometimes have more than one meaning...

[Cboldt]

-- would you please copy over the Qdrop# with each of these when you post them? --

When I post material that is a Qdrop, I am cutting and pasting directly from 8chan, so don't even know the "Qdrop#."

I'm just not going to bother anymore. I get nothing out of it. Nothing personal, and it's not your request that causes me to stifle myself. The material shows up here eventually - nobody is going to miss anything.

[TEXOKIE]

good one!

[smileyface]

Yes, just get the NYC cops to talk about it, weeping. It will go viral.

[Aquamarine]

To be clear your post described a reprobate. Not calling you one.

[little jeremiah]

Good points. I am sure that a video of sex act with a child would never, ever be made public. Maybe inferred, or parts blocked out majorly, or information about it made public. But not a video itself.

Your statement below makes total sense to me:

..it has to leave no doubt that a crime occurred (no wiggle room, no deals).

[TEXOKIE]

Earlier upthread I had the idea from the Q post that Tillerson was there to make a preemptive deal for extradition and/or incarceration. Had not thought about the Birth Cert or the other stuff you included. Good work, SW

You too baggie.

[Cboldt]

-- To clarify, I never actually "suggested that I obfuscate 8chan URLs using tinyurl" largely because I don't know what that means or how to do it. --

My mixup. That suggestion came from Swordmaker.

"Obfuscation" in this context is confusing or hiding the true URL through use of a substitute. As I mentioned, I think use of tinyurl is basically a way to hide behavior that is objectionable.

Not that it matters for purposes of my intentions, I still maintain that a plaintext URL in the context of these threads should not be objectionable. A plaintext URL is not a link.

[bagster]

Has anybody talked about this drop yet? Seems to me he could be talking about SEALS that are on the hunt or shadowing/protecting Snowden?

SEALS.
Where there was once darkness, there is now LIGHT.
Sea to shining sea.
Godspeed.
Q

[TEXOKIE]

Yes, thank you very much, zzeeman.

[TEXOKIE]

Thanks for the kind words. Back atcha. And yes, there are double meanings. We’ve certainly learned that!