Posted on 02/09/2018 6:23:09 PM PST by ransomnote
#696
Feb 9 2018 18:06:34
Q
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
[Next week]
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
We warned you.
You are stupid.
Can you sleep?
We can help.
Q
(Excerpt) Read more at qcodefag.github.io ...
Interesting.... I think you are right, but I have no particulars either.
Welcome to Mogadishu.
So, it wasn’t a local hit. They snagged someone...hmmm. Eric Schmidt? Edward Snowden? I’m free-associating now. Where is Eric Schmidt these days anyway? I have a feeling a lot of the clues point his direction. What would the 5 be then? E-5. Are we having fun yet? If this whole thing was a game, I’d pay money to play it.
It takes all kinds to win a war. But it most especially takes savage warriors.
There is a place for the meek, but the meek must not hinder the efforts of the savage. Sometimes savagery is the only thing that the enemy understands. They often times take kindness for weakness.
Our side has been kind for far too long. Time to go Old Testament on their ass.
"And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers."
New rules or not, I do not believe Obama will be brought to trial. That is not to say I think he will skate. I think he will be muzzled and allowed to fade into obscurity, suicided or “Disappeared”, but not tried or even arrested (Much as we all here might enjoy that). The risk of inciting the gibbmedats is too great. I do not think it will happen.
Hillary, on the other hand...
I never thought of Snowden, but that is a possibility I reckon. If the E is even about the guy. Maybe the smart people can connect these dots.
When did this happen?
I’ve seen that roundtable of generals 10 times and just
noticed the “Q”. ThankQ
You would be mistaken to think that I am suggesting meekness.
I mainly read the Qanon threads out of curiosity.
Two things that I have observed are disturbing:
1) the apparent unwillingness or inability of Q-true believers to engage in constructive dialogue with critics in a manner that is logically consistent, and
2) the apparent lack of good moral reasoning, amongst a lot of folks who say they pray and read the Bible.
:)
We both know that’s not going to happen bud it’s up to us to get the real stories out
Good catch!
A very profound post,Bagster.
(Nice guys finish last)
.
Feel free to lose your mind over the minions while completely ignoring the parent companies signing their checks — unless you decide to grow up.
The National Enquirer has picked up the Hillary-Obama bugged Trump theme on today’s newsstand. Compared to the lamestream media this is big news. EVERY low info voter will see this headline!
Game On! Go Q, MAGA!
Note Trump has NOT tagged Mueller with a nickname. Very telling...
That’s a very good point. I had not even noticed that.
I saw that today in line and remarked to my aunt that ‘those covers show up in the polls’.
Probably cyber using the missing IT assets rumored to be updated and removed by O during transition, most likely with backdoor traps lying dormant to foil Trump.
Barry’s DC digs coopted?
Obama going to trial? He should but I’ll believe it when I see it.
I’m ready for a “Night of the Long Knives”, if you know what I mean.
Jake Tapper, Chuck Toad, Chris Wallass, Moaning Joe, Rachel Madcow, Chrissy Tingles, Blitzer, Acosta, Millbank, etc., etc., all of ‘Em.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.