Step 2.) Trump says"Great bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Theresa May of the United Kingdom, affirming the special relationship and our commitment to work together on key national security challenges and economic opportunities.
Step 3.) Q says:Amazing coincidence? Always close after crumb drops.
Come on, people. You really don't see it? Maybe it takes a certain kind of mind to read betwixt the lines and connect th dots. You all have an extensive knowledge of world events. You are freepers after all, right? I suggest you expand your thinking.
Q says British intelligence is dirty. Trump meets with May shortly thereafter. There has been much conflict between Trump and May recently. May must appease her own government and people, who most of which hate Trump, and try to get along with Trump. She walks a very fine line. After meeting May, the British Trip is back on and he tweets this out. Included in the tweet is the phrase "key national security challenges."
Please explain your theories on what those key national security challenges might be. The message that Q is sending is that he and May have come to an agreement regarding the larger war between the globalists and the nationalists. Or the forces of good vs evil, if you will. The same war that we are all aware of and are fighting.
We are all in this together. Expand your minds and support the Donald.
Now, for the sake of humor. Let me say something to get your heads to explode. Since I'm in a cult, and all.
There is only one god, Trump, and Q is his messenger.
Inshallah
لَا إِلٰهَ إِلَّا ٱلله مُحَمَّدٌ رَسُولُ ٱلله
(disclaimer: I do not believe Trump is God or Q is a prophet. There is room for humor in this world.)
Glad I' m not the only one doing my Q homework daily and "red pilling" as they say my family and friends.
Freegards,
umbob
And your humor is appreciated.
Utter Qrap...
That sounds like a good interpretation to me, Bagster. I wonder if it’s leverage (Info he has that would destabilize UK society) or truce to fight a greater threat than each “ally” poses to the other.
I’ve been wondering the same thing about Putin. Remember that meeting among heads of state wherein Trump and Putin met in private for the first time.They became so enraptured by their conversation that they left the other sovereigns waiting and wouldn’t break off their conversation; Melania was sent into that private meeting twice to try the get the two men to rejoin the scheduled events with the others.
Putin was asked about his meeting with Trump. He seemed amazed and impressed, said Trump was “not like he is shown on television” and that Trump was incisive, analytical and some other words of praise. I think Trump and Putin agreed on some key issues re the swamp via Trump’s intellect and presentation of (some of his plans). Not to say they are buddies now - but there are a few signs that they have some common ground in some areas of the war against the swamp.
I think your interpretation works well with Trump’s MO.
There is room for humor in the world, if you would leave some for us instead of keeping it all in your arsenal!
Yeah, it does seem to take a special kind of rather bright mind to see between the lines; recognize patterns, discern relationships between puzzle pieces etc.
And THEN, those more lacking in such capacities drag along their bucket of rocks and start throwing as though THEY were the brightest bulb in the hallway.
No. That remark is not by "Q." It is under a header ...
Anonymous 01/25/18 (Thu) 12:42:56 d5ca84 No.158391
Plus, Q's "Amazing conincidence" remark, your "Step 3," came earlier ...
Q !UW.yye1fxo 01/25/18 (Thu) 12:31:36 fa6a1f No.158263
How dare you use the Q’s name (blessed be Q) in a humorous manner?
“Q is his messenger”
Even I could deduce this and I aint even that smart :)
...makes me wonder why the naysayers keep haunting these threads if they think Q’s all hogwash
This is a long thread and I haven’t read past your post. Nit pick below.
BUT:
https://qcodefag.github.io/
605:
Jan 25 2018 11:42:56
Anonymous ID: d5ca84
158391
>>158297
MI6 PLAYED BALL
they did the spying for us on us citizens at our direction as they always do
They ratted out their deep state masters?
is NOT Q, but an anon (all channers, IIRC, are ‘anon’)
THEN:
Jan 25 2018 11:44:04
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: fa6a1f
158405
>>158391
+ more, a lot more.
Q
This IS Q.
Data point/time line (again, IIRC)
Trump made a stop in Utah to retrieve *something(s)* from NSA data cache.
Trump meets May, discussion ensues. One could *assume* (something that, like *expect*, requires caution)any data from Utah was shared in a manner to make source/veracity unassailable.
Anon asks if MI6 played ball &/or confessed to participation in illegal surveillance.
Q does not refute and adds ‘more, a lot more.’
Does this relate to the leak/rumor that Trump’s refusal to attend the embassy dedication in UK was about an assassination plot against him, as well as distaste for the insecure glass building?
I tend to think so. I also believe Melania did not accompany Donald to Davos because threats are ongoing.
Media prepared the battlefield with a flood of stories predicting Trump would be snubbed, savaged, embarrassed at Davos AND there would be “massive” (TM) protests. Media was wrong on both counts. Were snubs and protests expected/arranged as cover/explanation for assassination attempt? Was May the only head of state cued in on all this?
_______________
Other than who made 1st statement, we agree. I do appreciate your quick wit, so ThanQ!
Well said.
It does. But not in a good way.