Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

This is a long thread and I haven’t read past your post. Nit pick below.

BUT:
https://qcodefag.github.io/
605:
Jan 25 2018 11:42:56
Anonymous ID: d5ca84
158391
>>158297
MI6 PLAYED BALL

they did the spying for us on us citizens at our direction as they always do

They ratted out their deep state masters?
is NOT Q, but an anon (all channers, IIRC, are ‘anon’)

THEN:

Jan 25 2018 11:44:04
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: fa6a1f
158405
>>158391
+ more, a lot more.
Q

This IS Q.

Data point/time line (again, IIRC)

Trump made a stop in Utah to retrieve *something(s)* from NSA data cache.

Trump meets May, discussion ensues. One could *assume* (something that, like *expect*, requires caution)any data from Utah was shared in a manner to make source/veracity unassailable.

Anon asks if MI6 played ball &/or confessed to participation in illegal surveillance.

Q does not refute and adds ‘more, a lot more.’

Does this relate to the leak/rumor that Trump’s refusal to attend the embassy dedication in UK was about an assassination plot against him, as well as distaste for the insecure glass building?

I tend to think so. I also believe Melania did not accompany Donald to Davos because threats are ongoing.

Media prepared the battlefield with a flood of stories predicting Trump would be snubbed, savaged, embarrassed at Davos AND there would be “massive” (TM) protests. Media was wrong on both counts. Were snubs and protests expected/arranged as cover/explanation for assassination attempt? Was May the only head of state cued in on all this?
_______________

Other than who made 1st statement, we agree. I do appreciate your quick wit, so ThanQ!


113 posted on 01/26/2018 4:37:12 AM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: reformedliberal
Other than who made 1st statement, we agree. I do appreciate your quick wit, so ThanQ!

Let me off you a counter nit pick. A freeper named mad as hell, worked out the timing of the Donald's trip to Davos. Based on departure and arrival time. He took into account the time difference. There seems to have been no time for him to have flown to Utah given that time line.

That in no way negates the possibility that he shared the information you describe with May, however. And Q didn't necessarily say he was going to Utah on the Davos trip. But rather he was going there on an "overnight trip."

I like your overall interpretation and it is most probably accurate. And thank you for the kind compliment. I, in turn, appreciate your genius.

185 posted on 01/26/2018 9:31:12 AM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson