Hillary Clinton *SHOULD* blast President Donald Trump

Original Material | 10/16/2017 | By Laz A. Mataz

[Mr. K]

yes! and she should keep doing it over and over and over

Until the entire country is sick of that shrieking harridan and democrats in general

[Lazamataz]

Your post shows that Trump is Satanic.

[Robert A Cook PE]

8<)

[Sacajaweau]

Gut says: I'm betting that Hillary and Weinstein were really, really good "friends" at one point...and why she tolerated Bubba's behavior.

And then Obama found out....and that's why she conceded the 2008 nomination to Obama without batting an eye. Didn't even seem to faze her.

Malia Obama worked for whom this year?

[Lazamataz]

I thought to ping Larry, but I decided against it. This is, to my mind, a foolish little bit of doggerel, but mayhaps he likes it. :)

[bigbob]

"Blast pressure test successful, Cap'n"

[DoodleBob]

I said it before. This is a golden opportunity. If the Republicans had any sense of testicular fortitude, they'd call a press conference and say:

"Democrats are clearly pro-misogyny. Silence equals consent. They said nothing while one of their fundraisers roamed as a sexual predator in Hollywood.

"It is sad that the loudest Democrat since this story broke has been Hillary Clinton, as she acknowledged that the Oval Office has seen a sexual predator - her husband.

"The Republican leadership asks the Democrats to reject their harboring of anti-woman fundraisers, and join us as we announce the start of hearings on this poisonous atmosphere in Hollywood, with an eye toward regulating studios and actors and actresses as a public good."

[ptsal]

Well, there is always an opportunity to visit Drudge and get the whole story.

Finding the truth

[Silentgypsy]

You are a constant source of inspiration. You and people like you are the reason that Trump supporters aren’t being deceived by the msm.

[Zuse]

My mistake.
I said “Trump” when I meant to say “Hillary.”

[elcid1970]

Laz, don’t go Glenn Beck serioso on us. Stick to regaling FReepers with your encounters with the fair sex, who’s not guilty or whether you’d hit it, kinda an `R’ version of The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis.

And don’t forget, we need our regular dose of Catherine Zeta-Jones, geez my palms are getting sweaty already.

Stay in your lane, Laz, and continue to perform your public service for FR.

Meanwhile, we should just let Hillary be Hildabeast. I’ll allow, though, that you must have hacked into her speech archives because she sounds crazier by the day.

;^)

[Lazamataz]

Laz, don’t go Glenn Beck serioso on us.

I must. Hillary's words shows how dangerous and criminal Donald Trump is.

[rlmorel]

Hahahaha...nicely done, Mr. Laz!

I am reading this, and can imagine the short circuit that would take place once her handlers realize the implanted chip that makes her appear human and normal (to some) is compromised by a conservative hacker, her head would start jerking to one side as her eyes roll, and she would repeat over and over...”Huma...lesbian...server...Whitewater...Bill the Rapist...Huma...lesbian...server...Whitewater...Bill the Rapist...”

[HarleyLady27]

I was very upset a while back when people would attack Our President, but watching what he is doing to make Our Lives better in all the ways he can, when Hillary Hag comes out with something, I laugh...

Let her make a bigger fool of herself than she already is, he own husband isn't even talking to her, she jets sets of to some country and gets booed...LMAO...loving every minute of it...

Thank You Laz, I love your thread and can now sit back and enjoy the laughter that we all need as we know she will NEVER see the inside of the White House or another Government Office again in her life time!!!

[poconopundit]

Laz: Why did the Leftist press decide to expose Harvey Weinstein.  Why, after all these years did they break their silence on something that all the people knew about? I am very curious because for the New York Times and New Yorker to let the word out about this is totally out of character. My theory is it's one of the following reasons:

1. Against their character, a critical mass of powerful Hollywood women finally decided to band together and take him down.
   
   
2. Because people realized that Fake Media is so fake and so anti-American, they decided they needed to make someone a scapegoat to say, "See, the NYT is not biased".  So they picked someone big, but vulnerable.  They did not choose to take down the Clintons because the Clintons use the Arkanacide option.
   
   
3. The rise of conservative social media, Judge Moore's election, and the take-no-prisoners attack by Steve Bannon forced the Media to throw up a token victim.
   
   
4. The MAGA movement and Trump presidency has become so strong that NYT felt they needed to (at least one time) do something righteous -- to mask their constant lies.

Why in the New York Times break this story? To me, this is the crucial question in this Harvey Weinstein controversy. But no one is asking or taking about this question.

[Lazamataz]

Thank You Laz, I love your thread

I appreciate the kind words.

[elcid1970]

Laz, you are such a card.

;^)

[NorthMountain]

I wish sexual assault against ME was coming.

I bet the Podesta boys would be happy to oblige ...

[SueRae]

Hahaha. All I know is I’ll be watching the 1 year anniversary of the election soon, courtesy of Youtube and Jameson’s. On the rocks!!

[alstewartfan]

Sorry Hillary, you have no chance with Melania.