Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
Laz: Why did the Leftist press decide to expose Harvey Weinstein.  Why, after all these years did they break their silence on something that all the people knew about? I am very curious because for the New York Times and New Yorker to let the word out about this is totally out of character. My theory is it's one of the following reasons:
  1. Against their character, a critical mass of powerful Hollywood women finally decided to band together and take him down.

  2. Because people realized that Fake Media is so fake and so anti-American, they decided they needed to make someone a scapegoat to say, "See, the NYT is not biased".  So they picked someone big, but vulnerable.  They did not choose to take down the Clintons because the Clintons use the Arkanacide option.

  3. The rise of conservative social media, Judge Moore's election, and the take-no-prisoners attack by Steve Bannon forced the Media to throw up a token victim.

  4. The MAGA movement and Trump presidency has become so strong that NYT felt they needed to (at least one time) do something righteous -- to mask their constant lies.

Why in the New York Times break this story? To me, this is the crucial question in this Harvey Weinstein controversy. But no one is asking or taking about this question.


35 posted on 10/16/2017 7:45:12 AM PDT by poconopundit (CNN is... Corruption News Neglected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: poconopundit; HarleyLady27

Remember the firestorm years ago when Rush asked, “Do we really want to watch this woman age?” haha, that was great..

“This woman”, “who should be in jail” (DJT) is becoming even more shrill as the walls are closing in on her and her rat lines all through American life.

I think her shrillness and the NYT etc. are anticipating charges varying from collusion with foreign entities, Foundation pay to play, IT espionage, bribery, threatening, etc... and the ‘tick tock’ message might just pan out.

(hey - where’s Huma? Maybe she’s singing!)


44 posted on 10/16/2017 8:04:05 AM PDT by bitt (The press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: poconopundit

“And, by the way, send that cute high-cheekbones, thin one in the white sequins behind you to my room. Janet Reno wants her water-washed and naked in the jail cell overnight.”


71 posted on 10/16/2017 10:57:42 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson