Posted on 08/26/2017 2:56:33 PM PDT by Beave Meister
In a disturbing move that reeks of tyranny, Oregon Governor Kate Brown signed a Democrat bill into law that permits the Oregon government to steal guns without notice.
The law, based off of Oregon Senate Bill 719, has faced massive resistance from Republicans and Oregon citizens alike. Despite this, the local governments managed to sign it into lawOregon is no longer a free state.
12 SHARES SHARE THIS STORY In a disturbing move that reeks of tyranny, Oregon Governor Kate Brown signed a Democrat bill into law that permits the Oregon government to steal guns without notice.
The law, based off of Oregon Senate Bill 719, has faced massive resistance from Republicans and Oregon citizens alike. Despite this, the local governments managed to sign it into lawOregon is no longer a free state.
This new anti-second amendment law allows all officials in the state of Oregon to order the removal of guns from the possession of free individuals. There is no evidence that is needed to perform the confiscation. The gun owner isnt given a hearing until after.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnewspolitics.com ...
Oregon voters voted these people in because they were kind, progressive and had such good intentions. If this Governor were running right now 99.999999% of every leftist that voted for she/it would still cast their vote the same way.
“It’s for the children!” they’d cry; “We want to abort them.”
Leftist are like that.
If you dont consent, they will force you into a road block around a blind corner and murder you in the snow.
The choice is your, Oregon.
Good luck with that.
The law only applies to individuals deemed an imminent danger either to themselves or to others; evidence is required for a judge to make the ruling, which can be appealed.
Please note imminent harm to self or others. The same standard as having someone involuntarily committed.
And that giant sucking sound you hear is every taxpaying, productive citizen fleeing Oregon for Nashville TN. Come on, y’all! Bring ya guns, too!
“which can be appealed”
Lol, the judiciary is totally corrupt—Controlled by leftists
“The law only applies to individuals deemed an imminent danger either to themselves or to others”
IOW...Whatever the elites deem to be a danger...White males that voted for Trump
IBTZ
If it’s zot worthy then so be it. But the actual text of the law doesn’t seem to accord with the vague but threatening alarmism of this poorly written and un-sourced article.
And in other news...
Coming to a state near you!
Great! Now send them to Chicago.
Head-In-The-Sand Post Alert!
If you can’t see that as a danger, then you’re mentally ill or a troll...probably both.
Here, kitty, Kitty, Kitties!
I wonder how long it will be before there’s a lawsuit over this.
How many citizens do these unamerican political hacks really think will comply with such a patently illegal “law?”
“Shall not be infringed.”
You should read the actual law. It is far different that what is portrayed here. It only applies to those considered a risk to themselves or others. Only law enforcement officials, not all government officials, and family members can ask for the removal of the firearms. Only after a court hearing does the individual have to give up his guns. Read the law before making knee jerk reactions.
Have you ever tried to retrieve a gun from a LE organization, even with a court order?
No and No. I am going to retire there.
If you own a hunting rifle and decent pistol I will make an exception.
Just like the Nazi's and Stalin...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.