[pharmacopeia]

The law only applies to individuals deemed an imminent danger either to themselves or to others; evidence is required for a judge to make the ruling, which can be appealed.

Please note imminent harm to self or others. The same standard as having someone involuntarily committed.

[Electric Graffiti]

“which can be appealed”

Lol, the judiciary is totally corrupt—Controlled by leftists

“The law only applies to individuals deemed an imminent danger either to themselves or to others”

IOW...Whatever the elites deem to be a danger...White males that voted for Trump

IBTZ

[Tonytitan]

Please note imminent harm to self or others. The same standard as having someone involuntarily committed.

And in other news...

Florida Suicide Prevention

Coming to a state near you!

[SuperLuminal]

"The law only applies to individuals deemed an imminent danger either to themselves or to others; evidence is required for a judge to make the ruling, which can be appealed."

Head-In-The-Sand Post Alert!

[TXnMA]

Still here, nubeetroll?

Here, kitty, Kitty, Kitties!

[NorthMountain]

“Shall not be infringed.”

[mad_as_he$$]

Have you ever tried to retrieve a gun from a LE organization, even with a court order?

[Chode]

then why aren't they IC'd?

[Skywise]

Please note they’re trying to get psychiatrists to pronounce Trump as mentally incompetent so he can be removed under the 22nd amendment.

have you seen what counts as a psychiatrist these days in colleges?

All it takes is one socialist doctor to say you’re a bad man and your gun rights are revoked.

Come out against “same and rational government policies towards immigration” and lose your guns.
Protest against gay marriage and lose your guns.

This is guilty until proven innocent and it’s unconstitutional.

[Teacher317]

The law only applies to individuals deemed an imminent danger either to themselves or to others; evidence is required for a judge to make the ruling, which can be appealed.
Please note imminent harm to self or others. The same standard as having someone involuntarily committed.

Which is almost excusable, if it were true. However, if you look at the news this very week, with half of the nation trying to label the President as "mentally compromised", you can quickly see that a Leftist judge can always be found to suddenly "find" that any Freeper who criticizes the next Saint Obama must clearly be mentally unstable and thus an "imminent danger". They already label every right-wing group and and rally and webpage as Nazi and dangerous and violent. Do you really not get that?

[Teacher317]

(Freeper profile is less than 7 weeks old. Hmmm)

[PROCON]

Yes, you have interpreted this law correctly.

It still is tyranny at it's worst.