Skip to comments.
CERN Declares War On The Standard Model
Universe Today ^
| Matt Williams
Posted on 04/20/2017 10:52:44 AM PDT by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: BenLurkin
Kim Jong-un an antimatter Kim Jong-un would meet and destroy each other
21
posted on
04/20/2017 11:29:11 AM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
To: BenLurkin
The more they look, the more they find, and the more complicated things get, which prompts them to look some more.
So, let’s keep things simple and stop looking.
God seems to be playing games with the scientists and researchers. The closer the scientists get, the further away God puts the answers.
22
posted on
04/20/2017 11:33:06 AM PDT
by
adorno
(w)
To: adorno
What, does God hate scientists?
23
posted on
04/20/2017 11:37:45 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: I want the USA back
They find particles that dont occur naturally. So what do they actually find?"We have to remember that what we observe is not nature herself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."—Werner Heisenberg
24
posted on
04/20/2017 11:45:32 AM PDT
by
snarkpup
("The Democrat party's policies are like a warm blanket of asbestos." - Crystal Wright)
To: BenLurkin
Question: do these colliders ever pay for themselves?
25
posted on
04/20/2017 12:11:35 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
(1 John 3:23)
To: BenLurkin
Fascinating. (Raises eyebrow.)
26
posted on
04/20/2017 12:11:58 PM PDT
by
TBP
(0bama lies, Granny dies.)
To: aimhigh
27
posted on
04/20/2017 12:15:10 PM PDT
by
dangerdoc
(disgruntled)
To: aimhigh
You put a penny in it and drop a quarter in the slot and it’ll stretch out the penny.
Of course, it also creates a Black Hole, so you lose the penny.
28
posted on
04/20/2017 12:17:37 PM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: BenLurkin
Anthony Patch has a very interesting take on what CERN is all about. Don’t look him up unless you are ready to take the red pill.
29
posted on
04/20/2017 12:55:37 PM PDT
by
Disambiguator
(Keepin' it analog.)
To: BenLurkin
What, does God hate scientists?
Is that your only interpretation of what I wrote?
Nope, God does not hate scientists, but, he created those scientists, and in His image, which means that, God does have a sense of humor too.
So, do you think that God's work, aka: creation, will ever be deciphered by us mere mortals?
30
posted on
04/20/2017 1:16:12 PM PDT
by
adorno
(w)
To: dp0622
Especially before a Big Bang. You wins the thread.
/simple hormonic oscillator> /or is it osculator?> (talk about your Uncertainty Principle)
31
posted on
04/20/2017 1:17:59 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: adorno
Oh probably not. But let’s find out all we can in the meantime.
32
posted on
04/20/2017 1:18:37 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: blueunicorn6
You put a penny in it and drop a quarter in the slot and itll stretch out the penny. dp0622 already mentioned The Big Bang Theory, so enough of the talk of putting it in Penny and Penny getting stretched out.
That's Leonard's job, anyway.
33
posted on
04/20/2017 1:21:17 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: BenLurkin
I’m not good enough at math to debate particle physics. But it just feels wrong that every time they have a problem with the Standard Model they hypothesize an as yet unknown particle which they eventually discover after spending billions of dollars. How much money did Einstein or Newton need? My feeling is we don’t need more science spending we just need better scientists.
To: grey_whiskers
Pardon me while I go and get a cup of warm cocoa and my quilt and go sit in my rocker and muse on all the word plays I missed on this thread.
35
posted on
04/20/2017 2:22:17 PM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: BenLurkin
But lets find out all we can in the meantime.
I'm with you.
But, those CERN scientists are now looking for a different kind of physics, because the Standard Model does not fit their theoretical expectations. Perhaps the "other model" which they seek, is already with us, and it's known as "Creation". The scientific mind doesn't want to accept that which they can't measure or detect or envision with "standard" methods.
36
posted on
04/20/2017 3:13:22 PM PDT
by
adorno
(w)
To: adorno
Deciphered? All the time.
Fully deciphered? Not likely, as more knowledge mostly begets additional questions.
37
posted on
04/20/2017 6:34:19 PM PDT
by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: adorno
38
posted on
04/20/2017 7:06:43 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Disambiguator
Gave him a listen.
Near as I can tell, the guy is crazier than a shtt-house rat.
39
posted on
04/20/2017 7:08:13 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson