Posted on 03/19/2017 7:19:19 AM PDT by MNDude
Trump recently stated on an interview on Fox news that he would be submitting some interesting evidence that he was spied on.
What do you predict he is going to release, and how strong will this evidence be?
That was John Boehner, not Newt.
“I think that’s how Donna Brazile ended up copping to her lie. “
The timing of her confession is interesting. It was a dead issue until she gave it CPR.
You could have a video of Obama raping and eating children and he’d still get the Nobel prize handed to him by Bill Cosby, with both of them blaming Trump and Gorebull Warming for what Clinton did.
Then, CNN would carry this story: Trump causes Gorebull Warming which resulted in rape, murder and canabalism of innocent children.
Could be he was fed a line of bull to discredit him.
***********
Sure, it is possible, but the judge has has a great deal of integrity and is not someone who is easily misled or engages in hyperbole. I don’t think he would run with questionable and unverifiable sources like most of the media does.
Its a sensational story, no question about it, but one that is credible in view of the numerous (and infamous) other eavesdropping incidents known to have been carried out by the Obama administration.
Google this article in theSun.co.uk, “Who do you think you are kidding? Russia is ‘behind’ the White House’s wild claim that GCHQ tapped Donald Trump’s office, say top spies”
I shouldn’t be surprised that GCHQ are dragging out Russia to blame, but I still was. Very sad.
Heard on O’Reilly the other night, talking to Bret Baier (think I got this right, it was on Fox evening show on Thursday night?)......stated that Flynn was NOT at Trump Tower after all when the call was “wiretapped”, he was out of Country.
Does anyone else recall hearing this????
More than likely, he would transfer his Mosque Membership to one of the Muslim countries with no extradition treatry with us:
Countries with no extradition treaty with US
Friday, July 31st 2015, 10:00 am PDT
Friday, July 31st 2015, 10:00 am PDT
These countries currently have no extradition treaty with the United States:
Afghanistan, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Armenia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belarus, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Brunei, Burkina Faso, Burma, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, the Central
African Republic, Chad, Mainland China, Comoros, Congo (Kinshasa), Congo (Brazzaville), Djibouti, Equatorial
Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Ivory Coast, Kazakhstan,
Kosovo, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libya, Macedonia, Madagascar, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands,
Mauritania, Micronesia, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Nepal,
Niger, Oman, Qatar, Russia, Rwanda, Samoa, São Tomé & Príncipe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia,
Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Togo, Tunisia, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu,
Vatican, Vietnam and Yemen.
http://www.wsfa.com/story/22665099/countries-with-no-extradition-treaty-with-us
So far it’s like the online equivalent of pissing your pants in public, claiming someone else did it and then not bothering to change or explain. If Trump has evidence, the time to clean up the mess is passing quickly. My $0.02.
Oh please. Those were planted by the same team that rigged the World Trade Center with thermite and who forced Monica upon a reticent Clinton.
I’m thinking along your lines. What gets exposed is how the USA “outsources” spying on US citizens and just how widespread and pervasive it is.
Then the Swamp will whine about Trump exposing our “sources and methods” making Americans less safe.
How much of this by the Swamp is to distract Trump/Sessions from the following investigations:
1. Clinton Foundation
2. Wiener/Huma, Wienergate emails, Clinton emails
3. Pizzagate
Trump has always proven to be right. Especially when he doubles down. The parsing of words tactics by his detractors tells the story. There is fire there and the use of shorthand verbiage in a tweet is not going to save the liberals.
some REAL GARDEN SPOTS ON THAT LIST.
There have been a number of comments here to what the Judge said but can you clarify what you are referring to as a ‘chilling article’? I listened to Napolitano’s comments about CGHQ on Fox and Friends and since Fox hasn’t actually given the comments much time since then, out of curiosity I went his website a few days ago to see if had any update comments. A link on his homepage leads to this article (dated March 16) and from what I can see, there have been no further updates since. http://www.judgenap.com/post/did-obama-spy-on-trump The first hint that the Judge’s comments aren’t all that rock solid is that the title for the article ends in a question mark. Near the bottom of the article is this clip: Sources have told Fox News that the British foreign surveillance service, the Government Communications Headquarters, known as GCHQ, most likely provided Obama with transcripts of Trump's calls. The NSA has given GCHQ full 24/7 access to its computers, so GCHQ -- a foreign intelligence agency that, like the NSA, operates outside our constitutional norms -- has the digital versions of all electronic communications made in America in 2016, including Trump's. So by bypassing all American intelligence services, Obama would have had access to what he wanted with no Obama administration fingerprints.
Is this supposed to be ‘chilling’? Frankly, this statement sounds much less definite than what I heard from the Judge when his statement was live on Fox and Friends….. ‘Sources have told Fox News’ (he doesn’t say they told him personally), ‘most likely provided’ (that sure doesn’t sound definite), ‘NSA has given GCHQ full 24/7 access’ (ok….. so they have the capability), ‘….Obama would have had access to what he wanted’ (fine but there is no comment as far as executing that access).
What the Judge wrote in this article is far more waffling than his live statement. All one can hope is that if surveillance really happened as the Judge has suggested, the sources better be pristine enough that the Judge didn’t need to leave the wiggle room that he obviously has now created for himself. If you have information to the contrary, I’m sure we’re all interested in hearing what it is……
Trump or Sessions will fire him if he pulls that stunt again.
I think that was caused because the question kept coming up after Trump hammered home the issue of CNN bias and collusion with Hillary's campaign. As scummy as I believe the media generally is, I think it is human instinct to start digging when they feel they are being ignored or misled.
If they could, they should have done it already
No problem.
The caps just added to the Garden Spots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.