Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Norway wants to scrap controversial air passenger tax
TheLocal.no ^ | 10 March 2017 15:25 CET+01:00

Posted on 03/10/2017 3:17:13 PM PST by Olog-hai

At its national conference, Norway’s governing Høyre party announced that it plans to scrap a mandatory airline tax connected to last year's closure of Oslo Rygge Airport.

The party wants to replace the flat fee with a new type of tax that would have a “clear environmental effect,” reports newspaper Dagbladet.

The proposal, which came from the Østfold division of the party, was made at the end of a debate on transport. […]

RSL closed down operations on November 1st 2016 following Ryanair’s decision to cease using the airport after the introduction of the tax. Around 1,000 people are estimated to have lost their jobs as a result of the closure, reports Dagbladet. …

(Excerpt) Read more at thelocal.no ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Local News; Travel
KEYWORDS: airlinetax; airpassengertax; norway; rygge

1 posted on 03/10/2017 3:17:13 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Make the travelers step on the scales and pay a tax based upon weight.


2 posted on 03/10/2017 3:26:55 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Why pay any tax at all?


3 posted on 03/10/2017 3:28:47 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The weight tax correlates with the changes in the environment.

It is simple to calculate.


4 posted on 03/10/2017 3:30:36 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
replace the flat fee with a new type of tax

A rose by any other name.

5 posted on 03/10/2017 3:32:38 PM PST by bgill (From the CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

And it’s still a tax.


6 posted on 03/10/2017 3:34:37 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bgill

This is a corpse flower rather than a rose.


7 posted on 03/10/2017 3:35:28 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The party wants to replace the flat fee with a new type of tax that would have a “clear environmental effect,” reports newspaper Dagbladet.

In other words, they want to replace a tax with a bigger tax.

This is likely a big deal in Norway. That place is rugged as hell, fjords and mountains make it hard to get around easily in reasonable time by ground transport. Lots of people fly a lot.

8 posted on 03/10/2017 3:48:14 PM PST by pepsi_junkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

People respond to taxes....

Impose taxes and the masses will move around them.

Tax travelers based upon weight. Only skinny people will travel.


9 posted on 03/10/2017 3:52:50 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

Well, they’ll certainly succeed in driving away more airlines and closing more airports, then.


10 posted on 03/10/2017 3:53:47 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

Why push the social engineering? Bad enough the government does it. Taxation per se has already cost Oslo one airport.


11 posted on 03/10/2017 3:54:59 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Taxes based on weight are are universally fair.

Just think about applying this rule to football (soccer) or to basketball.

Basketball should have a height-based scoring system. Goals made by folks over six feet tall would count less than sub-six feet goals.


12 posted on 03/10/2017 4:13:38 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; Lazmataz; humblegunner; Liz; artichokegrower

Perhaps, taxes should be based up ....race, national heritage, or left-handedness.

It’s Norwegian issue (travel taxes) and they can do whatever they want.

It’s been fun playing the game, but, really, the topic should be thorough vetting of travelers and banning the bad hombres.


13 posted on 03/10/2017 4:21:21 PM PST by ptsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

You seem to have a penchant for taxes, with weight as a secondary pet peeve. I can’t see any conservatism in that, with all due respect.


14 posted on 03/10/2017 5:35:14 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ptsal

That’s like saying the USSR could do whatever they want.

The taxers’ goal is world conquest. Should we, as Americans who have stood against such illicit goals and for freedom, let them do whatever they want?


15 posted on 03/10/2017 5:36:22 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Replace all flights with sleds and longships.

Much more environmentally friendly.


16 posted on 03/10/2017 9:02:50 PM PST by Mount Athos (A Giant luxury mega-mansion for Gore, a Government Green EcoShack made of poo for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson