[metmom]

This is only a *controversial executive order* for those who want to destroy the US.

The media are the ones making it controversial.

The rest of us agree with it.

That’s why we elected President Trump.

NO country owes anyone who wants to come in permission to do so. It’s a PRIVILEGE, not a RIGHT.

And it’s NOT their country.

[JudyinCanada]

No shortage of nerve, that’s for sure.

[rigelkentaurus]

Seems to me, the VISAs have been suspended, so they are not currently valid. Anyway, detained is not good enough, expelling them is.

[albie]

I can only guess at Trump’s response? Bring it on?

[Kudsman]

Where in the Constitution does it state that non-citizens have rights? Specifically, the “right” to enter the US?

[HarleyLady27]

ROFL...they didn’t hear ‘their brother’ was not in power any longer??? To sad, ship em back!!!

[Gaffer]

Visas are at the pleasure of United States Government; they can be revoked at ANY time. They have no standing.

[taildragger]

No mention if they were Chaldean, please dominant media, do your homework.....

[moehoward]

Shades of clockboy. LSM will cover all the initial hubbub and none of the fizzle out.

[headstamp 2]

I see the Iraqis are learning the American tradition of litigation and victimhood fueled by an ambulance chaser stationed on the airport tarmac.

Next stop, a flaming liberal jurist to rule against the Trump administration.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

Trump's controversial executive order

Hardly.

[Williams]

Good luck and screw them.

[butlerweave]

Trump should also change the Green Cards so the Millions Obama gave out are worthless

[Bubba_Leroy]

Why were they detained in New York? They should have been shipped back on the next plane to Iraq.

Of course, this was all carefully staged and planned for weeks waiting until Trump followed through with his promise. The lawsuit was already drafted and waiting to be filed in a Democrat friendly court the moment that the already chosen plaintiffs arrived in the U.S.

[WKUHilltopper]

Not your country...GTFO.

[MinuteGal]

Who's exactly paying for the lawsuit....and/or....which legal firm or organization(s) is laying out the considerable amount of front money?

Leni

[FlingWingFlyer]

Throw their asses out and throw their “lawyers” out with them.

[Texas Eagle]

...both men legally were allowed to come into the US but were detained in accordance with Trump's move to ban travel from several Muslim-majority nations.

I smell bullsh*t.

[Wuli]

If immigration rules can be legally bent one way, as Obama did, then it most likely cannot be illegal for another President to bend them another way. Likely there is “in the national interest” clauses, as deemed by the executive branch, permitting exceptions to the rules.

[bkopto]

The lawsuit could represent the first legal challenge to Trump's controversial executive order

Next step: judge-shopping to find an Obama- or Clinton-appointed judge