Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

This is only a *controversial executive order* for those who want to destroy the US.

The media are the ones making it controversial.

The rest of us agree with it.

That’s why we elected President Trump.

NO country owes anyone who wants to come in permission to do so. It’s a PRIVILEGE, not a RIGHT.

And it’s NOT their country.


2 posted on 01/28/2017 7:57:24 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: metmom

The left-wing media use the word “controversial” when they want to signal their opposition. It’s curious that none of BHO’s edicts were ever “controversial.” For a better grasp of the truth of things, ignore CNN and go to Breitbart.


13 posted on 01/28/2017 8:01:33 AM PST by Blennos ( As)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

File the lawsuit in Baghdad.


15 posted on 01/28/2017 8:02:12 AM PST by mfish13 (Elections have Consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

These lawsuits are non starters. The US Immigration Act is very clear. The President has total power to ban any group of people from the US for any reason and any length of time. It further states that the number one reason for letting refugees into the country is religious persecution. So bringing in Christian Syrians and banning others is perfectly legal.


21 posted on 01/28/2017 8:05:36 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

If it’s Republican, it’s controversial. If it’s Democrat, it’s all good, no matter how far Left it is. It has been that way for decades. i ‘got’ the Media manipulation during the Whitewater scandal. In the LATimes, which we took until the incident I am going to describe, Clinton’s attorneys were credited with using ‘sophisticated maneuverings’, while Starr’s group were slurred with using ‘desperate tactics’. And this was 20 years ago. I also was enlightened to the true purpose of the ‘Women’s Movement’ at the time. I BELIEVED Anita Hill and voted for Clinton in 1992. And yet, when I saw Anita Hill being interviewed on the Today Show during the Clinton sex scandal, I ‘got’ the Feminist goal. Hill was asked about Billy Boy and her answer was ‘well, you really have to consider his voting record’. NOT KIDDING. I had decided, a long time before this comment, that Feminists weren’t really for all women, just women who agreed with their Leftist agenda. But that comment from Hill was the straw that broke the camel’s back for me. And I haven’t voted for a Democrat since.


23 posted on 01/28/2017 8:06:42 AM PST by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: metmom

“And it’s NOT their country.”

If their lawyers succeed, it will become theirs eventually.


32 posted on 01/28/2017 8:20:53 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson