1 posted on
01/03/2017 1:17:46 PM PST by
Gamecock
To: Gamecock
my eyes! MY EYESSSSSSSS!!!!
2 posted on
01/03/2017 1:19:12 PM PST by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
To: Gamecock
** Heath told police that she was being paid to clean the business dressed in red lingerie, **
Not posting a pic, because believe me, this is one of those things that briefs better than it executes.
3 posted on
01/03/2017 1:19:13 PM PST by
Gamecock
(Gun owner. Christian. Pro-American. Pro Law and Order. I am in the basket of deplorables.)
To: Gamecock
4 posted on
01/03/2017 1:21:16 PM PST by
dfwgator
To: Gamecock
To: Gamecock
When a group of men report a woman for indecent exposure, you just know she has to be a special kind of ugly...but with four kids, I guess there are some really desperate men out there or really drunk men..
6 posted on
01/03/2017 1:24:39 PM PST by
Smittie
(Just like an alien I'm a stranger in a strange land)
To: Gamecock
Can’t see the body though.
7 posted on
01/03/2017 1:25:10 PM PST by
dp0622
(The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: Gamecock
SCIENTIFIC MAPS.......
Its all in the name.......
8 posted on
01/03/2017 1:25:15 PM PST by
Uversabound
(Our Military past and present: Our Highest example of Brotherhood of Man & Doing God's Will)
To: Gamecock
Uhmmm, we’ll, her 1st name portends sumb kinda ugliness...
9 posted on
01/03/2017 1:25:37 PM PST by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
To: Gamecock
One person was taken into emergency protective custody due to “his erratic behavior and claiming to see things, which were not there,” the report says.
Every sentence of the full article is about some kind of weirdness.
10 posted on
01/03/2017 1:27:48 PM PST by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
To: Gamecock
To: Gamecock
She just needed the hair on her nipples trimmed.
To: Gamecock
Latigra Charell—I don’t even have to look...
25 posted on
01/03/2017 1:50:13 PM PST by
ClearBlueSky
(Whenever someone says it's not about Islam- it's about Islam. That death cult must be eradicated.)
To: Gamecock
If she had done this in Times Square she could have posed for pictures with her 4 kids and a few tourists and gotten paid $10 for her troubles while the cops stood by.
27 posted on
01/03/2017 1:54:24 PM PST by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: Gamecock
“Latigra,” is it? Don’t even have to guess...
28 posted on
01/03/2017 1:55:11 PM PST by
Noumenon
(Proud Irredeemable Deplorable, heavily armed Infidel. Islam delenda est.)
To: Gamecock
ROCK HILL -- A 28-year-old woman has been charged with exposing herself outside a Saluda Street barber shop
Found this on her from 2015...
July 9, 2015
Rock Hill women accused of biting, stabbing each other during fight
Two
Rock Hill women were arrested Wednesday after a fight during which one woman was bitten on the foot and the other was stabbed in both arms, according to Rock Hill Police.
Officers responded to an assault at a home on the 500 block of Glenn Street about 10 a.m. Wednesday, according to a police report.
Latigra Heath, 26, told officers she got into a fight with 28-year-old Mirrumonty Meeks.
During this fight, Heath was bitten on her left foot and her right eye was scratched, police said. Meeks was stabbed in both arms, and was transported by EMS to Piedmont Medical Center for treatment.
Heath was charged with second-degree assault and battery and placed in the Rock Hill city jail, where she remained Thursday under $6,000 bond.
Meeks was charged with second-degree assault and battery after being released from the hospital. She was placed in the Rock Hill city jail, where she remained Thursday under $1,092 bond.
Heath’s children were released to her father, police said.
http://www.heraldonline.com/news/local/crime/article26856490.html#storylink=cpy
33 posted on
01/03/2017 2:10:48 PM PST by
ETL
(On the road to America's recovery!)
To: Gamecock
It does kind of beg the question though: if a person is dressed provocatively in her own home or business, even if a passerby can see her, can it be considered indecent exposure or public indecency? What steps does one need to take to prevent the public from seeing into a private space?
40 posted on
01/03/2017 2:32:05 PM PST by
IronJack
To: Gamecock
Latriga has the kind of name you might give to a kid conceived in a latrine.
41 posted on
01/03/2017 2:39:10 PM PST by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: Gamecock
She didn’t get hit with an ugly stick.
She climbed up the ugly tree, fell off with her face hitting every limb on the way down, landed in the middle of the road, then got run over by the ugly log truck.
To: Gamecock
Latigra....
I don’t think I want to look.
53 posted on
01/03/2017 4:35:26 PM PST by
Organic Panic
(Rich White Man Evicts Poor Black Family From Public Housing - MSNBCPBSCNNNYTABC)
To: Gamecock; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; A Strict Constructionist; ...
South Carolina Ping 
Send FReepmail to join or leave this list.54 posted on
01/03/2017 5:17:20 PM PST by
upchuck
(Obama once thought that he belonged to the ages. Now he belongs in the rubbish bin. h/t D.Greenfield)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
