Posted on 12/11/2016 5:17:54 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda
Russian Interference Could Give Courts Legal Authority To Install Clinton
A 1995 federal court ruling out of Pennsylvania may offer some clues to Clinton supporters as to possible legal authority for removing an elected official from office and replacing them with their erstwhile opponent.
In light of late-breaking reports Friday evening that Russians interfered with the 2016 presidential election to assist Donald Trumps victory, Clinton supporters are furiously in pursuit of remedies.
At 10:45 p.m. Friday evening, the Washington Post broke an explosive story alleging that Russians had interfered with the 2016 presidential election in order to assist Donald Trump in a victory over democratic candidate Hillary Clinton. The story reveals that a CIA assessment detailing this conclusion had been presented to President Obama and top congressional leaders last week.
(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...
NOT going to happen.
Yeah, we get it. Strategery doesn’t work too well for the dem crybabies
election - FAILED
recounts - FAILED
Russian interference - FAILED
NEXT??????????
I just discovered why Democrats hate Russia so much. If you Google Russians beat gays” in images, you will find that gays are targeted by citizens and the state for public beatings & humilation.
The MSM has done a stellar job of not mentioning that this “interference” amounted to nothing more than telling the truth about their crooked candidate.
“Which is to say, that if after Donald Trump assumes office it is shown that Russian hacking (or any fraud, for that matter) robbed Hillary Clinton of the presidency, there is some legal authority on point that implies courts could seat Clinton instead.”
First, extremely difficult to prove Russians sent Podesta’s emails to WikiLeaks
Second, even if the Russians captured Podesta’s emails...
(a) the actual actor was WikiLeaks - Russians did not disseminate the information to the public
(b) impossible to know their intent was to install Trump (maybe it was simply they disliked Podesta, or even actually wanted Hillary, or to cause the potential Civil War II)
(c) impossible to know the number of votes that actually switched
Nope. But according to liblogic 101 “might have” is as good as “we have THE smoking gun”. And, don’t you DARE try to contradict us.
“CIA assessment presented to Bongo and top congress critters”
Donald will eventually see this assessment, if it actually exists. I’m sure its crap and he will rightfully fire a bunch of CIA personnel. And the MSM will use that as evidence of a cover up. This is the left’s only narrative of why they lost, they will use it for the next 8 years as they fade into obscurity.
Anti-American Dreamers.
Alex Mohajer claims to be an “Actor, singer, lawyer, and political director of Bros4Hillary”. He’s just writing as directed. Hillary actually believes she is going to steal the election.
Maybe they will try to steal the election in the courts. Is this why the Dems killed Scalia?
I’m looking for what part of the constitution has this in it.
More liberal twits on drugs.
Anything to give the snowflakes a few more days of hope. The mass suicides when it is finally, completely over will be too much for local first responders to handle. And even worse, the recriminations against Hillary Clinton and her failed campaign will truly start in earnest then, and her ego will not be able to handle them. :)
I’ll have to check out DU on this one. I’m sure it’s a leading thread over at their place.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.