I Stumbled onto Something Very Strange (vanity)

me ^ | 11/24/16 | lafroste

[lafroste]

OK, this is a little out there. I blundered into an obscure website about an hour ago that claimed that Jill Stein's recount effort was being funded by a bot. That website appeared to be toxic as it crashed my Firefox so I woun't give the link out willy-nilly. It claimed that ever since the donation page opened yesterday, that donations were entering with a nearly mathematical precision, regardless of the time of day (donations just as steady at 3: am as they were at 3:00 pm).

So I decided to do my own impromptu test and got what, I think, are very interesting results. I first logged onto JS's donation website at 3:44 PM EST this afternoon. I finally got my sampling sh%t together by 4:00 PM and took readings every 5 minutes until 4:30. These are the results I got:

Time, reading ($), delta $, Delta time (min), rate of change ($/min)
3:44, $3990,481.84, NA, NA
3:53, 4,012,481.85, $21,634.01, 9 min, $2,403.78
3:55, 4018,237.85, $6,122.00, 2 min, $3,061.00
4:00, 4,027,407.69, $9,169.84 , 5 min, $1,833.97
4:05, $4,036,133.64, 5 min, $8,725.95, $1,745.19
4:10, $4,044,530.03, 5 min, $8,396.39, $1,679.28
4:15, $4,052,919.66, 5 min, $8,389.63, $1,677.93
4:20, $4,058,634.66, 5 min, $5,715.00, $1,143.00
4:25, $4,065,474.09, 5 min, $6,839.43, $1,367.89
4:30, $4,073,973.09, 5 min, $8,499.00, $1,699.80 .

As you can see, the data is remarkably consistent. If this pattern holds, the website should hit its funding goal of $4.5 million about 8:30 PM EST tonight. Also, if you back calculate to the zero dollar point, this funding effort began about 36 hours ago, which if I am not mistaken, is very close to the truth.

These are NOT spontaneous contributions. This is a BOT programmed to make contributions at a set pace while minutely varying minute to minute rates to obscure. But these guys are not very bright, it seems.

Whose BOT is it? What account is it donating from? This stinks to high heaven.

[Pajamajan]

bttt

[Democrat_media]

Soro’s bot

And that bot couldn't have gotten access without Stein's cooperation.

so this proves that Stein , Soros and Hillary are all in on this . soros is paying most of it 7 million dollars which is illegal under FEC laws. so this has to get to Team trump , ingraham.

Or on Trumps web site huge button for send us ideas(email)
https://www.greatagain.gov/

[Salvation]

A Soros bot?

[Freedom56v2]

With all due respect, what do you think Luntz would do about his?

[Freedom56v2]

I suggest you email it to Sean Hannity...

[SuziQ]

I think it was one of those ‘crowdfunding’ efforts. If the kids want to put their money into it, let them. The results won’t change, and if Florida, 2000 is any indication, Trump will likely come out of it with even MORE votes.

[bigtoona]

In the Wikileaks emails they were giving instructions to take large donations and break them into thousands of small $20 donations using fake doner names. They were taking say a 1 million dollar donation which is illegal and making it look like a bunch of regular folks donated it. Anything under $50 doesn’t need to be verified according to election rules, they even stated the $50 threshold in the email I saw.

So they are probably doing the same thing here, a bot is registering a bunch of small donations using a bogus list of addresses.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

:" In the Wikileaks emails they were giving instructions to take large donations and break them into thousands of small $20 donations using fake doner names...
.. Anything under $50 doesn’t need to be verified according to election rules, they even stated the $50 threshold in the email I saw."

We've already seen that the DNC has been running a 'dirty tricks' campaign for several decades, by Creamer and others own admissions.
These tactics include outright violation of electoral rules, candidates direct collusion with PACS, threatened violence, collusion with the media, establishing 'fake stories',
even stories written and edited by the campaign staff, and subterfuge.
Now that there is direct evidence of numerous violations of election laws, funding, media bias, foreign investment into election campaigns,
where is the prosecution for these Federal rules violations ?
Where is the accountability and responsibility action by government for these violations ?
Instead, the 'perp' is fired, or resigns from the organization, and everybody acts as though that action is sufficient; more like "Opps, we got caught".
My response is "No, that's not enough", since the 'perp' moves along into another form of political skullduggery and rules violation.
Lets get some criminal prosecutions to end these violations, especially when it comes to electronic or foreign funding of political campaigns.

[LucyT]

Ping to # 88, and then check out article and cements.

Thanks, Tilted Irish Kilt.

[uncitizen]

Soros

[philman_36]

Ping to # 88, and then check out article and cements.

snicker

Got shoes on your mind?

[LucyT]

Oops...

No excuse!

[LucyT]

It isn’t enough to have cement shoes. A person also needs a helicopter with flying range able to go hundreds of miles over the ocean and then return safely.

Wouldn’t a lead lined casket accomplish the same thing? Then dropping the dearly departed into an ocean?

[philman_36]

Bayous got gators and I know where they roam around here!

[rodguy911]

bingo you can pass go but no money the country is broke....

[rodguy911]

We need to look for this beginning six months before the mid terms.I bet it goes on there as well.

[P.O.E.]

That was going to be my guess. Breaking up a big donation and using a list of names off one of their databases.