I say Korzen was stupid because when the IRS contacted me the next month, right around Thanksgiving, I recognized the complaint: it was basically the same as the one that Korzens lawyers had sent to CNN. (The IRS probe finally ended without penalties.)
See the connection: Podesta creates Catholics United; Soros funds Catholics United; and Catholics United sponsors an IRS complaint against me (after trying to get me kicked off CNN). Their attempt to intimidate me was a monumental failure, but the fact that they tried is what counts.
Yeah, just like Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was fired.
Only to quickly be brought back with a new title.
you misspelled “arrested”
that’s disgusting.
Right now the catholic vote is a tie. I know hispanic catholics are killing us but another 10 percent among white catholics would help a lot!
Maybe this will wake them up.
I hated soros BEFORE I knew he was trying to take down my religion. Now it’s go time!
If this story can just get out more, and get Catholics riled against Hillary, it could change things.
Fired?
How about hanged?
The dwarfs that work for the queen of late term abortion.
This from the guy who supports muslim terrorists, if they are upset by cartoons.
no...now we’ve got access ;-)
Did Soros lackeys cause the replacement of Benedict VI with a commie lib theology hack?
But Catholic will still vote for Hillary.
Fire Podesta and it gives her an “out”. “I’m shocked at the things he said and I fired him. Now we need to get back to talking about the issues like ‘who hacked those emails and who grabbed more women’s crotches, me or Trump.”
Seriously, calling for his firing gives the press their excuse to ignore every email.
Some of the most prominent refugee resettlement organizations are Catholic-related. I wonder if the Dem’s attempt at subversion of the curch is all recent, or if they started long ago enough to have trickled out into the refugee orgs by now. That would go a long way to explaining the resettlement orgs’ unquestioning compliance with the Usurper’s covert Hijra occupation of the US.
It’s too bad this idiot, Bill Donoghue, opposed Trump and his nomination. Now he wants that same apparatus to fight for him. Donoghue pissed off alot of Catholics over his position on Trump. He should have been more careful.
If the press were in any way fair of impartial this would headline news presented with outrage every day.
How could he be fired for doing what he’s paid to do? That’s like saying the mob should fire their enforcers or banks should fire their bill collector intimidators.
How much $$$ did Tony Podesta snag in this adventure?
No only should Podesta and Palmeri be fired, the Archbishop of Washington needs to get out the Bell, Book, and Candle and excommunicate those two reprobate apostate heretics.
So-called "progressives" of both Parties in recent times, portray themselves as the "intellectual" elite, although they may be totally bereft of any real knowledge or understanding of the great ideas which were the seedbed of Ameria's successful 200-year experiment in liberty.
Today's so-called "progressives," with all of their domination of academia and Far Left politics, seem to fit into a category described in an essay by T.S. Eliot on Virgil:
"In our time, when men seem more than ever to confuse wisdom with knowledge and knowledge with information and to try to solve the problems of life in terms of engineering, there is coming into existence a new kind of provincialism which perhaps deserves a new name. It is a provincialism not of space but of time--one for which history is merely a chronicle of human devices which have served their turn and have been scrapped, one for which the world is the property solely of the living, a property in which the dead hold no share."(Bold added for emphasis)
Without intellectual anchoring in the enduring ideas which provided the philosophical foundation of America's Declaration of Independence and Constitution, their vain imaginations of superiority only expose their limited world view.
Yet, the America which rose from obscurity to greatness, from crude hoes and axes to putting a man on the moon, and from oppression by King George to a symbol of liberty for millions all over the world--that America provides shelter for them, even as they attempt to "change" her into something unimagined by the Founders, and ungrounded in Constitutional principles.
If they are allowed to succeed in their own little provincial experiment, their posterity never will know the "blessings of Liberty" proclaimed by the Preamble to America's Constitution.
See excerpts: The Anvil that Has Worn Out Many Hammers
By Editorial Staff
Published December 22, 2007
Nineteenth century writer H.L. Hastings once forcibly illustrated the unique way in which the Bible has withstood the attacks of skepticism:
“Infidels of eighteen hundred years have been refuting and overthrowing this book, and yet it stands today as solid rock. Its circulation increases, and it is more loved and cherished and read today than ever before. Infidels, with all their assaults, make about as much impression on this book as a man with a tack hammer would on the Pyramids of Egypt.
“When the French monarch proposed the persecution of Christians in his dominion, an old statesman and warrior said to him, ‘Sire, the church of God is an anvil that has worn out many hammers.’ So the hammers of infidels have been pecking away at this book for ages, but the hammers are worn out, and the anvil still endures. If this book had not been the book of God, men would have destroyed it long ago. Emperors and popes, kings and priests, princes and rulers have all tried their hand at it; they die and the book still lives.”"(End excerpt)
Now, read an excerpt from John Quincy Adams's Jubilee Address, delivered in April 1839, in New York City, which recaps the real history of the founding of America and the framing of its Constitution:
Excerpts: The motive for the Declaration of Independence was on its face avowed to be "a decent respect for the opinions of mankind." Its purpose to declare the causes which impelled the people of the English colonies on the continent of North America, to separate themselves from the political community of the British nation. They declare only, the causes of their separation, but they announce at the same time their assumption of the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, among the powers of the earth.Thus their first movement is to recognize and appeal to the laws of nature and to nature's God, for their right to assume the attributes of sovereign power as an independent nation.
The causes of their necessary separation, for they begin and end by declaring it necessary, alleged in the Declaration, are all founded on the same laws of nature and of nature's God - and hence as preliminary to the enumeration of the causes of separation, they set forth as self-evident truths, the rights of individual man, by the laws of nature and of nature's God, to life, to liberty, to the pursuit of happiness. That all men are created equal. That to secure the rights of life, liberty and the pursuits of happiness, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. All this is by the laws of nature and of nature's God, and of course presupposes the existence of a God, the moral ruler of the universe, and a rule of right and wrong, of just and unjust, binding upon man, preceding all institutions of human society and of government. It avers, also, that governments are instituted to secure these rights of nature and of nature's God, and that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of those ends, it is the right of THE PEOPLE to alter, or to abolish it, and to institute a new government - to throw off a government degenerating into despotism, and to provide new guards for their future security. They proceed then to say that such was then the situation of the Colonies, and such the necessity which constrained them to alter their former systems of government.