Guccifer 2.0 Drops New Cache of DEMOCRAT EMAILS
The documents include more than 11,000 names matched with some identifying information, files related to two controversial donors and a research file on Sarah Palin.
Posted on 07/27/2016 10:15:38 AM PDT by rdl6989
BREAKING—- Guccifer 2.0 dropped a new cache of Democrat emails on Wednesday. Guccifer 2.0, the hacker who breached the Democratic National Committee, has released a cache of purported DNC documents to The Hill in an effort to refocus attention on the hack.
The documents include more than 11,000 names matched with some identifying information, files related to two controversial donors and a research file on Sarah Palin.
“The press [is] gradually forget[ing] about me, [W]ikileaks is playing for time and [I] have some more docs,” he said in electronic chat explaining his rationale.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
You think that would stop those stupid ‘RATs from trying? LOL
I hope they do, and end up with loads of Obama in their diapers!
ping for later reading.
Guccifer 2.0 Drops New Cache of DEMOCRAT EMAILS
The documents include more than 11,000 names matched with some identifying information, files related to two controversial donors and a research file on Sarah Palin.
see post #70
The Hill article is dated July 13, 2016
Guccifer2’s last post was on July 14
https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/
July 14, 2016
New DNC docs
You may have read about my new release in the media this time. As I can see it, many of you wish to have a look through the docs with your own eyes. So, I don’t have courage to keep you unaware any longer. Here you are: Hsu Contributions Hsu TY Magliochetti campaign contributions 99-00 […]
From:
Donald Trump
To:
KKK
Dear sirs: I, racist, do pledge millions of dollars for you to start a race war, and keep all other races down because I am secretly a white supremacist.
PS - Don't tell anyone......
Posters on the site said it was old news?
I hear you. The problem is Hoft. But it’s not just him, it’s become pervasive. All over the net there are pieces that headline “breaking” or similar bait to suck us in...we read eagerly...and if we take the time to click back to the original article we find it’s days or weeks old.
Very frustrating but a lesson for us to pay attention to- go back to original article and check date.
There’s some very clever attempts online to confuse and blur and misinform the public. Lots of us trust anything we read IF it fits with what we believe or hope. Others trust but VERIFY. We’re all going to have to get better at the latter if we expect to find the truth about the world.
Yep, the Russians couldn’t hack FBI week but can hack convention week. And the media ignores the obvious contradiction.
And the Krauthammers and Wills and Fox play right along.
He will before it’s over.
Just not in the way they think.
All the things being exposed by him and whatnot.
Thanks;)
I thought Guccifer was dead. Someone posted an article that he was found dead a couple weeks ago. Was that a hoax?
“Is Guccifer the same as Wikileaks?”
Yes. Russian military hackers.
Wikileaks is a front. So are Guccifers.
“Not breaking news. The Hill story is from 2 weeks ago.”
Breaking click bait.
The report of his death was a hoax apparently.
Check the links in the original post. This is not new. It’s from two weeks ago.
So maybe Trump did bait the e-mail dump today.
The article is dated July 13th. I don’t think this is breaking news.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.