Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Fat Chicks Being Choosy About a Man's Height is Feminist Hypocrisy at Its Worst
self | self

Posted on 07/10/2016 8:51:16 PM PDT by ErikJohnsky

I've used a couple of dating sites in my time, and went to college with an active dating and hookup scene. Somehow, it is socially acceptable for non-thin girls to think a fit, in-shape male who happens to be short is "too short" for them, or that the girl is too good for them.

Height can't be controlled at all and therefore, like race (whatever race tho, not just blacks but whites, reds, browns, yellows too), does not reflect one's values or personality traits. Weight can be easily controlled; fat girls are usually too lazy to go to the gym, and lack will-power and determination to control their diet. Given that many short men keep in good physical shape, women who are overweight should be HONOURED to get some of them, instead of being the prissy and spoiled types that feminism has promoted, with this "girl power" and that its OK for girls to be as "shallow" about men as men are about women.

Is that fat chicks can "look down" on a short guy a great example of sexual affirmative action brought about "feminism," which clearly looks for easy targets, and short men are?

Ugly is subjective; height is not. Also, plastic surgery can help with a bad face and nose; there is no practicable height surgery, aside from breaking your leg bones for one or two inches. God made short men short; he did not make fat chicks fat.

A girl who is less slim than a short guy ought to "check her arrogance."

One thing too; ever notice the multitude of "fat girls should love their body and show it off," and "plus-size model" stuff, but no equivalent for short men? While short men, THANKFULLY, haven't joined the grievance culture, its still liberal hypocrisy that short men are the only group of people affected by acts of God, their height, that liberals think its OK to trash and be prejudiced against. Its "racist" for a white girl to say she'd never date a black, but perfectly fine, and almost encouraged, for girls to never date a shorter guy, even tho height, like race, is determined by the Almighty.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: dating; discrimination; feminazi; feminism; runtofthelitter; shortguys; shortrunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: BigEdLB

“My son is 15 and already 6’ 0”, same as me. I guess I have to be aware of things.”

Height in men has the same affect on women as a woman’s breast size has on men.

A woman generously endowed will get at least one look from every man in the room; she may not get a second, but she will get noticed.

Conversely, a tall man will get at least one look from every woman in the room; he may not get a second, but he will get noticed.

The difference being that most men are fine with women who are less than generously endowed, while women have a deep seated need to “look up” to their man (both literally and figuratively).

Hence, women set unrealistic requirements. “Must be at least 6’ tall” when only 15% of men are 6 foot or taller. He must be better educated than her, when 60% of college grads are women.

The “man shortage” women complain is really a shortage of men that meet women’s unrealistic expectations.

Hypergamy. Spend a little time researching that word, and you’ll understand exactly why women set these unrealistic expectations for men.

BTW, tell your son that if he waits till he is 30 to get serious about getting married he will LITERALLY have women throwing themselves at him.


61 posted on 07/11/2016 3:46:31 AM PDT by Brookhaven (Hillary Clinton stood next to the coffin of an American soldier and lied to his parents' face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

Self esteem issues?


62 posted on 07/11/2016 3:57:07 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

“my post is about short men who happen to be winners, not losers. They ought to be higher on the food chain than any overweight girl, and used to be before feminism and liberal social engineering”

Rollo Tommasi at “The Rational Male” (https://therationalmale.com/) has written extensively on this, and can explain the exact reason for this.

Men have much higher standards for who they will marry than who they will sleep with. Women believe that if they can sleep with a certain level of man, they should be able to marry that level of man.

There’s your disconnect.


63 posted on 07/11/2016 4:06:18 AM PDT by Brookhaven (Hillary Clinton stood next to the coffin of an American soldier and lied to his parents' face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

Just another example of why “short people... got no reason to live.”

Per the article: Fit short guys get looked down upon by big fat chicks.


64 posted on 07/11/2016 4:40:49 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

actually, any girl, whether she is fat or not, can refuse to date anybody for any reason.
My husband is 5’7” and i can hide behind him. He’s not tall but he’s taller than me. In fact, I don’t think i have ever dated a “tall” man.
But a jerky guy who thinks he’s a catch? Merci, non!!


65 posted on 07/11/2016 4:45:19 AM PDT by ronniesgal ( Go Trump!!! Kick ass and take names!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BJ1

“- Just say no to fat chicks
- Just say no to sluts
- Just say no to women who won’t cook
- Just say no to feminists
- Just say no to spoiled princess”

Kind of rules out American girls. Not sayin’ that it’s bad, though...


66 posted on 07/11/2016 4:56:34 AM PDT by BobL (If Trump is DENIED the nomination, Republican Officeholders WILL GO DOWN in flames)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

“Weight can be easily controlled...

It depends on the cause. Best not to generalize.”

I agree with the second sentence. In 1% of the cases, there is a biological cause for obesity that cannot be overcome.


67 posted on 07/11/2016 4:58:20 AM PDT by BobL (If Trump is DENIED the nomination, Republican Officeholders WILL GO DOWN in flames)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

What height are you?


68 posted on 07/11/2016 5:05:12 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (Did you get pears?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LukeL

Information for all:

I adopted four black children at birth.

One, a female started gaining abnormal amounts of weight from birth, on a VEGAN Diet.

The only thing experts from Boston Children could tell us it that we should try high protein low carb.

Not much luck there.

Genetics information: there was a broken strand that is common to heavy women mostly AA. You know the body time, large breasts, large rear, big stomach strong muscles.

It is a genetic issue, at least in that subgroup.

Their solution:

Gastric bypass at 11 with redos throughout life.


69 posted on 07/11/2016 5:07:48 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian governments are the biggest killer of citizens in the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

I dated a woman who was 6’3” (+5”) and we got along just fine. She liked my sense of humor.


70 posted on 07/11/2016 5:33:43 AM PDT by PLMerite (Compromise is Surrender: The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

Those websites are a joke. They almost all want guys 6’ tall or taller, no matter how short they are. I come in 2” under that, no sale.


71 posted on 07/11/2016 5:44:36 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

I’m 6’2, why would I want a land whale?


72 posted on 07/11/2016 5:51:53 AM PDT by Death To ISIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky
it is socially acceptable for non-thin girls

"Non-thin" <> "fat"

There are a lot of stunning women who have classic hourglass figures.

My wife is a perfect size 14, I'd take her any time over some woman who strives to look like a death-camp survivor or heroin addict.

73 posted on 07/11/2016 5:51:53 AM PDT by Eric Pode of Croydon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30; equaviator; Pearls Before Swine
Everybody has the right to decide who is good enough for them and who is not. Of course they have the right, just like all have a right to believe in open borders, but at a certain point, it still doesn't mean they are right. Women ought to know that their role is largely to have/raise the kids, and with careers, its largely auxiliary to the male. Guys have their careers, athleticism, talents, girls have their looks, and might have those things too, but yes, in that order. Lots of guys like fat or “Rubenesque” chicks. However, the majority of men like a woman whose measurements are closer to 36-24-36. That’s just the way it is and it has nothing to do with Barbie or Playboy. True, and I don't dispute that. Traditionally, only men got to be picky about such things, until feminism. That's how things ought to be.
74 posted on 07/11/2016 6:30:49 AM PDT by ErikJohnsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky
and when I say "in that order" for girls, I mean looks, and then maybe career, athleticism, and talents. Also, for guys, I don't mean "athleticism" in terms of being a varsity athlete in the HS glory days, I mean being in shape/fitness.
75 posted on 07/11/2016 6:32:36 AM PDT by ErikJohnsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

So should we extrapolate from this that you are short and have recently been rejected by a fat chick? :-)


76 posted on 07/11/2016 6:37:28 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

women ought to know....LMAO I am surprised you are having trouble getting anybody, with all your knowledge to share.


77 posted on 07/11/2016 7:27:44 AM PDT by ronniesgal ( Go Trump!!! Kick ass and take names!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ErikJohnsky

Fat chick to guy who likes fat chicks: “Does this pair of Oshkosh B’Gosh XXXL overalls make my butt look skinny?”


78 posted on 07/11/2016 7:39:58 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod; ErikJohnsky
It depends on the cause. Best not to generalize.

Okay...for what % is this the case?

79 posted on 07/11/2016 8:12:36 AM PDT by gogeo (I am a proud Trumpublican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry; ErikJohnsky
It’s more about them than about you.

Actually, I'd say it's all about them. But you can't argue with chemistry.

80 posted on 07/11/2016 8:14:54 AM PDT by gogeo (I am a proud Trumpublican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson