Free Republic 2016 Caucus Open Discussion Thread LXXXIII

Free Republic ^ | 10 April 2016 | Windflier

[Lonely Bull]

DO NOT VOTE ON THIS THREAD.

This is the nightly DISCUSSION thread for the ongoing 2016 Free Republic Caucus. Per caucus rules, no comments are allowed on the caucus thread itself - hence this open chat thread.

If you'd like to vote in the caucus, please look in the sidebar for the link, or check downthread here.

Thanks, and let 'er rip!

Windy

Free Republic Caucus 2016 04/11

[Lonely Bull]

FR Caucus discussion ping

[Lonely Bull]

Free Republic Caucus 2016 Discussion Threads ping list.

To join or leave this list, or for questions and comments, please reply to Lonely Bull (private replies and mail welcome). You will receive a routine daily ping to the discussion threads as long as these caucus threads continue. Each discussion thread will contain links to results and older threads.

Today's voting thread: Free Republic Caucus 2016 04/11

Please reserve the voting thread for votes (and follow the rules given there); please do not post ping-related correspondence in the voting thread. Thanks for your interest!

[Lonely Bull]

Table 1: Free Republic Caucus 2016 threads, most recent 15 days

Date	Voting thread	Discussion thread	Results [on www.hotr.us]	Sequence no.
4/11	[link]	[link]	[available later]	83
4/10	[link]	[link]	[link]	82
4/09	[link]	[link]	[link]	81
4/08	[link]	[link]	[link]	80
4/07	[link]	[link]	[link]	79
4/06	[link]	[link]	[link]	78
4/05	[link]	[link]	[link]	77
4/04	[link]	[link]	[link]	76
4/03	[link]	[link]	[link]	75
4/02	[link]	[link]	[link]	74
4/01	[link]	[link]	[link]	73
3/31	[link]	[link]	[link]	72
3/30	[link]	[link]	[link]	71
3/29	[link]	[link]	[link]	70
3/28	[link]	[link]	[link]	69

Table 2: tables with older threads

Dates	Table	Sequence nos.
3/23 - 4/06	[link]	64-78
3/16 - 3/30	[link]	57-71
3/09 - 3/23	[link]	50-64
3/02 - 3/16	[link]	43-57
2/24 - 3/09	[link]	36-50
2/17 - 3/02	[link]	29-43
2/10 - 2/24	[link]	22-36
2/03 - 2/17	[link]	15-29
1/27 - 2/10	[link]	8-22
1/20 - 2/03	[link]	1-15

[onyx]

Thanks very much!

[Unrepentant VN Vet]

Thanks from me as well, but I’m afraid that I’m going to pass on any more of the fun and games I’ve seen on FR this evening so I can go catch some (much needed) beauty sleep.

Don’t let the dumbsh**s burn anything down while I’m gone, please.

G’night.

[snarkpup]

Likewise. This place was on fire today. I suppose that's probably because the country's on fire.

[DoughtyOne]

Good evening. Thanks again...

Results: 2016 04/10 on the forum

[Windflier]

Thanks for having my back these last couple of nights, Bull. Much appreciated.

[Windflier]

“This place was on fire today. I suppose that’s probably because the country’s on fire.”

Truer words were never spoken.

I told my wife tonight to redouble her prepper purchasing. I’m nearly convinced that something big is going to happen, by (or before) election day.

Beans, bullets, and bullion, people. The thing will not hold, at the current rate of pressure. Something’s going to give.

[Read Write Repeat]

Hmm.

[onyx]

Why not just say it’s about the CRUZ BIRTHER LAWSUIT?

[jdsteel]

It’s kind of funny that here on FR people go through the process of a caucus and have Trump as a 7 to 1 winner yet the Trump campaign itself to date hasn’t grasped the concept of a caucus or how delegates work and instead goes for a popular vote.

[Unrepentant VN Vet]

Guess we’re all just naive about voting and all that gummint stuff here.

I’m sure we would be more clear and up-to-date if we’d remember to put quotation marks around certain words and phrases when used by political figures and especially lawyers who happen to be political figures.

Such as:

“Conservative”

“Fair and square”

...or even the ever popular “One man, one vote”.

(Mind you don’t forget the /sarc and please note that this “caucus” does operate by individual vote and not by what some uncharitable Old School type might describe as “lawyer snivel tactics”.)