Posted on 03/27/2016 4:18:19 PM PDT by drewh
Washington Post (and others) sitting on video. We've indy confirm video looks bad, showing multiple hotel encounters
According to person who worked for Rubio campaign. Cruz video shows *multiple* hotel encounters with non-spouse females. Just entry & exits
Except that he wasn’t fired. He produced a paycheck from the Washington Times just last month. WT is lying.
Twitter has proven better then the 6 corp news so far on the Cuban Mistress Crisis.
You are a sick man. Damn you.
Gosh, it must be true because it is on the Internet.
I wonder why such breaking news is found only on the “Enforcer for Trump” blog (and now Free Republic since you have posted it)?
Its BS until a video is produced.
***************
A copy of the hotel registration logs would be much better.
Any hints to the names used?
I’m not a Cruz supporter but politics in the USA has gone from dirty to down right slime!
I thought earlier in the campaign that it was Rubio who was having affairs. I'm having a tough time keeping all this gossip straight. Didn't the Enquirer accuse Trump of having affairs when he was married to Ivana? Did they report on any when he was married to Marla?
If Ted is on video leaving with a DC hooker, she will be recognized by the video.
I wonder if Ted always dines with hookers?
Yer killin me!
You seem to be more up on the gossip than I. You tell me.
Was someone tailing Cruz or does this restaurant/hotel take pictures of all entering and leaving? It seems curious that a video could exist of something happening multiple times and it not be some type of surveillance.
NE is not dumb. They are well lawyered up and screen all stories for facts. They will make a great deal of money by stringing out the story piecemeal over a one/two month time period. Eventually we’ll know all the names and times and places and even video. Cruz is toast.
========================================================
Joseph of the bible, who then went on to become super vice president for life.
Just sayin...
(tilts head oddly)
No.... not YET....
“Except that he wasnt fired. He produced a paycheck from the Washington Times just last month. WT is lying.”
Wow, so what do you think it means?
March 5th
Every Tues and Thurs?
Yes, maybe. But as far as why someone would hold it, the going theory is that Rubes had this months ago and sat on it in case it was needed to take Cruz down at the convention, but the Enquirer got the stuff separately.
So where are we?
*Cruz makes a mysterious huge donation to Fiorina’s campaign, and one of the five women works with Carly. No “pwoof” but suspicious looking.
*Cruz and woman #2 Carpenter have a regular rendezvous, get temporary matching tattoos which they show off. No “pwoof” but again highly irregular for a married man
*Katrina Pierson, who HAS denied it is still catching hell from the GOPe and Cruzers. Not sure what, exactly, they want her to say
*The prostitute, with vague references there is a tape of Cruz leaving a hotel where she was. Again, if there is “pwoof” it isn’t public yet. However, there is the comment by the DC madam’s lawyer vaguely referencing material in her book that could impact a candidate in the election. Nobody here thinks this refers to Trump or Kasich, although it might involve Rubes.
So, there is no “pwoof” but there is a lot of smoke and it seems to be coming from one fire. My guess is that the whole GOPe is trying to keep the lid on because this is their means to remove Ted if he stops Trump. There is no way this ends well for Cruz.
No$$$ just in and out!
... and some cab $
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.