Skip to comments.
Controversial law charges people with murder for death at others' hand
Chicago Tribune ^
| 2-19-2016
| Duaa Eldeib
Posted on 02/20/2016 6:21:39 AM PST by Citizen Zed
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Interesting.
To: Citizen Zed
The felony murder rule is basic stuff.
I’ve never heard of it being “controversial” in any way.
2
posted on
02/20/2016 6:24:07 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Citizen Zed
I have no problem with felony murder charges for that parasite. A conviction would lock him up until he’s an adult criminal. One more murder conviction as an adult, and society would be safer. The problem with our prisons is that we don’t lock up parasites for long enough, and felony murder helps to balance those scales.
3
posted on
02/20/2016 6:24:49 AM PST
by
Pollster1
("A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Scalia)
To: Citizen Zed
This is not a new law, it’s fairly standard across states. Perhaps the “youngsters” shouldn’t have been trying to burgle a house.
4
posted on
02/20/2016 6:26:43 AM PST
by
RikaStrom
("To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize." ~Voltaire)
To: Citizen Zed
Hey, that 14 year old was “slight”.
Now, who could charge such an innocent soul?
5
posted on
02/20/2016 6:28:04 AM PST
by
Da Coyote
To: Citizen Zed
The felony murder rule is not unique to IL and isn’t controversial except in those circles who like to burgle and those who like to excuse same.
6
posted on
02/20/2016 6:28:54 AM PST
by
Paine in the Neck
(Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
To: Citizen Zed
The key to training and disapline is immediate punishment on discovery of an infraction.
If they don’t have a father or don’t get supervision, this is what happens.
7
posted on
02/20/2016 6:32:32 AM PST
by
dila813
To: Citizen Zed
I’d be fine with simply executing anyone who burgles houses.
8
posted on
02/20/2016 6:34:22 AM PST
by
A_perfect_lady
(Welfare: It's a Safety Net, Not a Hammock.)
To: Citizen Zed
9
posted on
02/20/2016 6:34:36 AM PST
by
Nateman
(If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
To: Citizen Zed
Nope. No sensationalism here. Controversial in her own mind.
The author
10
posted on
02/20/2016 6:35:45 AM PST
by
VeniVidiVici
(Obama = ISIS Fanboy)
To: Citizen Zed
Has Always been true. More effort to make it ok to participate in crimes even when people get killed.
Three scum break in my home and kill, you think I don’t blame all three?
11
posted on
02/20/2016 6:35:47 AM PST
by
Williams
(Dear God, please save us from the Democrats. And the Republicans.)
To: BenLurkin
It’s “controversial” only when it is applied against one of ^Obama’s sons^.
12
posted on
02/20/2016 6:36:35 AM PST
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym defines the science.)
To: Da Coyote
:: Hey, that 14 year old was âslightâ ::
And, he was wearing [gasp] A HOODIE!
13
posted on
02/20/2016 6:37:37 AM PST
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym defines the science.)
To: VeniVidiVici
Let me see so if Author’s Muslim friends kill someone all their friends could be charged also is that bad thing
To: VeniVidiVici
Question: Was it her father or husband that violated Sharia for allowing her to attend college and obtain a "journalism" degree?
15
posted on
02/20/2016 6:40:05 AM PST
by
Cletus.D.Yokel
(Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym defines the science.)
To: Citizen Zed
Nothing controversial about it, you start an illegal situation, somebody dies, the death is on you. You don’t have to do the killing, you made the situation.
16
posted on
02/20/2016 6:40:17 AM PST
by
discostu
(This is a different kind of flying... all together.)
To: Nateman
17
posted on
02/20/2016 6:42:41 AM PST
by
zek157
To: BenLurkin
I've never heard of it being âcontroversialâ in any way. I think it's controversial, and wrong, to charge a criminal for the death of an accomplice at the hands of law enforcement or a person resisting criminals.
The felony murder rule was generally understood as the notion that anyone involved in criminal enterprise is fully responsible for any crime that results. If two people rob a store and the clerk is killed, the accomplice is equally guilty as the person who pulled the trigger.
When the police or a homeowner kill a burglar, the killing was not a crime but a lawful act of self defense, and blaming the accomplice does not make the killing a crime, despite this novel new theory. Jack McCoy, call your office.
To: Citizen Zed
I’m 57 years old and this law has not been controversial in all of that time until, apparently, now. Hmmmmm....
19
posted on
02/20/2016 6:51:39 AM PST
by
TalBlack
(Evil doesn't have a day job...)
To: Nateman
Say what? I have to presume that the person holding that sign cannot read and some agent-provocateur handed it to him. Does James O'Keefe have an alibi?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson