Posted on 02/15/2016 10:11:13 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
ON OCTOBER 1, 2015, in a scene that has become depressingly familiar, 26-year-old Christopher Harper-Mercer walked into Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon, and opened fire, killing nine people and injuring nine more. Like George Sodini, who killed three women and himself in an L.A. Fitness Center in Pennsylvania; like Seung-Hui Cho, who killed 32 people and injured 17 others at Virginia Tech; and like Elliot Rodger, who killed 6 people and injured 14 others in Isla Vista, California; a large part of Harper-Mercer’s motivation was his toxic anger at women because of his lack of success with them.
Harper-Mercer was a virgin at 26, and not happy about it. According to police reports, his “manifesto†(which was not released to the public) contained complaints about how unfair it was that he didn’t have a girlfriend. And, like many of these other killers, his frustrations played out online—in blogs and on misogynist forums—before he ever took action.
In the hours prior to the shooting, a man believed to be Harper-Mercer posted a message on the anonymous bulletin-board site 4chan.org’s /r9k/ forum—the name stands for Robot 9000, and posters are often referred to as “Robots†stating—“Some of you guys are alright, don’t go to school tomorrow if you live in the north-west. Happening thread will be posted tomorrow morning. So long space robots.â€
The very first response to the message was, “Is beta uprising finally going down? You might want to chillax and not alert police.†Other commenters assumed it was a hoax. But when word of the violence hit the news, commenters in the forum cheered the shooter on as one of their own. Some declared, “OP [original poster] DELIVERED!†while others noted that the massacre might not have “had to happen†if only “OP†had been luckier in love...
(Excerpt) Read more at bust.com ...
And they are both pathological.
I’ve heard from some women that some.men are very up front about this. A feeling of entitlement is there with some. Some of these guys even in a first date situation, just start touching sexual areas with an expectation they are getting the ball rolling. Why would any man make such presumptions?
Us alpha males can’t grasp the concept. I love women.
That was my first marriage. My second is the opposite. 20 years on the first and almost 20 on the second so far. The woman matters.
Monotony is critical. Poligamy or sleeping around is.very destructive to the human psyche.
Monotony=monogamy
Stupid auto correct.
And no, it is NOT monotonous.
The ULTIMATE spell-check correction.!!!
—SNICKER..!—
Compliant? You're kidding, right? Inner city women are matriarchs. They are independent of needing support from any man (thanks to welfare and affirmative action for government jobs). They might allow a man into their bed from time to time if he's charming enough, and if he's enough of a thug to offer some degree of protection from all the other thugs in the hood.
What the "sexual revolution" has done, is to free women from having to have a husband. They now can sleep with a charming, handsome "alpha male" who would never have even looked at her in the days when marriage was required in order to have sex. Freed of any requirement to marry anyone, the Alpha males can hop from woman to woman, choosing the convenience of Beta women who are happy to accept them on whatever terms the man chooses, rather than trying to attract and marry an Alpha woman.
Meanwhile, the Beta males, who in decades past would be able to get SOME sort of woman interested in him, get spurned by women in their 20's and early 30's. When women get in their late 30's, and find the Alpha's are no longer interested, they might allow a Beta to marry their high-mileage selves, to provide a father for another man's children and some support for the women. Don't expect much sex, though. Beta's aren't terribly exciting.
And I just want them to shuddup....
There are some males who couldn’t get a female’s attention in a brothel with a stack of hundreds in their hand. In my experience they self isolate from the society as a whole into their cells of other losers. Currently they go by the label of “gamers”.
Saw it years ago with the Dungeons and Dragons dudes. Pointless efforts at no progress or goals.
Freudian auto correct?/s
Loser-types just need to go beta off.
You are describing an "omega male" type.
The classes of males, in the Alpha/beta/etc hierarchy is:
Alpha: a man who attractive women would be interested in having sex with, EVEN if he displays no interest in marrying them or is otherwise unlikely to go into a long-term committed relationship (although many women with excessive self-esteem may delude themselves into thinking that SHE will be the one to finally nail him down). Represents 10 percent or less of the male population.
Beta: a man who a woman would ONLY sleep with because he might marry, or otherwise commit to her, and offer some degree of financial security. Represents about 70-80% of the male population.
Omega male: a male who most women are uninterested in sleeping with. Will only get sex from hookers, or desperate omega females.
It is the main problem for males and females to go homo because it is *easier,* especially when they do not have the guts and/or confidence.
This is also the number one reason for easily recruiting terrorists:
1- to be somebody powerful who can despense life or death, mostly death
2- will have all the virgins they desire right now when capturing and enslaving women and later the f you die for allah!
Look at the hungry beasts in Western Europe as a confirmation. This recruiting can not be mitigated by the 0h0m0 *give them jobs!* because they are lazy, low IQ, and have no skills.
It’s not that they can’t get women, it’s that they can’t get the women they want.
ROFL! Your auto-correct is HYSTERICAL ... and YES it is monotonous! ;-)
After 29 years of marriage, I'm certainly ready to be single again..........
it was challenging with my first. My second is on 18 years and the honeymoon isn’t over. And we’re 62. I would not want another woman. I relish just spending Saturday mornings sitting on the porch or in the living room enjoying coffee and discussing things, past, present and future. She is my best friend.
Those are false rights. They are considered rights simply because someone exists. All such claims involve a contradiction and turns potential providers of a service or product into slaves who are expected to provide the service or product without receiving something in return. To be loved, one has to offer some value to someone else as a reason to be loved.
Looking back through past covers I have to say I am extremely disappointed. This is clearly not what I would call a “Bust” magazine. I mean, what about mags like “Cavalier”, “Click”, “Caper”, “Dude”, “Follies”, “Escapade”, “Duke”, “Frolic”, etc.? Now those were bust magazines!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.