Skip to comments.
Nazi Germany’s Panzer Corps Faked It ‘Til It Made It
War is Boring ^
| December 27, 2015
| David Axe
Posted on 12/28/2015 10:27:21 AM PST by C19fan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-168 next last
The British in the 1920s experimented with combined all arms mechanized units. The Soviets under Marshall Tukhachevsky advocated for deep strikes with large mechanised units. The article does not mention but the Germans experimented with doctrine in the Soviet Union.
1
posted on
12/28/2015 10:27:21 AM PST
by
C19fan
To: C19fan

Scariest looking tank ever.
2
posted on
12/28/2015 10:31:43 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: C19fan
“Military-industrial shadows”?
Kind of like Iran’s nuclear weapons?
3
posted on
12/28/2015 10:36:50 AM PST
by
ClearCase_guy
(I don't know what Claire Wolfe is thinking but I know what I am thinking.)
To: central_va
As scary and awesome as the Tiger was they should have put those resources into Panzer IV development. They could pump them out at much higher rates.
To: C19fan
The French, British and Russians all had better tanks than the Germans in 1939- 1941.
The allies also had a vastly superior number of tanks.
So the “ban” did work. The allies just forgot about superior tactics, training and leadership.
5
posted on
12/28/2015 10:41:41 AM PST
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: miliantnutcase
The Panzer Mk iv had a crappy transmission that MTBF was measured in hours. The their credit Pz repair troops could swap a tranny in about an hour.
6
posted on
12/28/2015 10:42:33 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: 2banana
Actually those vastly superior early war tanks theAallies had did not have radios, the German tanks did.
7
posted on
12/28/2015 10:44:06 AM PST
by
MNJohnnie
( Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered)
To: central_va
Nobody said nothing about locking horns with tigers!
8
posted on
12/28/2015 10:45:36 AM PST
by
wally_bert
(I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
To: miliantnutcase
The Panzer Mk iv had a crappy transmission that MTBF was measured in hours. The their credit Pz repair troops could swap a tranny in about an hour.My bad the MK V had the lousy transmission. The Mk iv was a good platform, just under powered..
9
posted on
12/28/2015 10:48:51 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: miliantnutcase
Exactly but they seemed to have a fetish over size
10
posted on
12/28/2015 10:50:02 AM PST
by
xp38
To: central_va
“Scariest looking tank ever. “
I remember hearing/reading something that said there were never more than about 70 battle-ready Tigers at one time. (Maybe this was on the Russian Front only)
But just the rumor that a tiger was operating nearby would scare the crap out of allied tankers.
11
posted on
12/28/2015 10:52:15 AM PST
by
PLMerite
(The Revolution...will not be kind.)
To: PLMerite
A tanker had two choices if they saw a Tiger. Unless they out numbered the Tiger more the 6 to 1; Runaway!
12
posted on
12/28/2015 10:55:33 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: C19fan
And we had JEEPEXs and GOLFCARTEXs.
We had the National Training Center and a top-notch Opposing Force.
And we went through those “Battle-hardened desert rats” of the Iraqi Army like they weren’t even there.
Now, they train Tankers at the Infantry School.
Hooooaaaaahhhhh!
13
posted on
12/28/2015 10:56:27 AM PST
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: central_va
The Mk iv was a good platform, just under powered.. I read an interview with a Sturmgeschutz crewman, he liked the late models III better than the IV. It was almost the same thing, but the IV was slower, and that mattered.
I'm tracking a guy in England that found the stripped, rusted, shot-out hulk of a Stg. III in the UK, and is completely reconditioning it. The transformation is stunning.
14
posted on
12/28/2015 10:56:43 AM PST
by
Riley
(The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
To: central_va
Seems anything german manufactured had a gazillion parts versus non-german like manufactured goods.... sort of a we built the fisher space pen and russians used a carpenters pencil in space thang .
15
posted on
12/28/2015 10:57:27 AM PST
by
Squantos
( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
To: Riley
Stug III was the poor man’s panzer. Extremely effective though.
16
posted on
12/28/2015 10:57:56 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Squantos
Seems anything german manufactured had a gazillion partsKind of like their language and word structure.
17
posted on
12/28/2015 11:00:12 AM PST
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: wally_bert
18
posted on
12/28/2015 11:00:44 AM PST
by
anymouse
(God didn't write this sitcom we call life, he's just the critic.)
To: central_va
Interestingly, I find the German language very precise although verbose. Words mean exactly what they translate to. German is fun!
19
posted on
12/28/2015 11:06:49 AM PST
by
raybbr
(Obamacare needs a deatha panel)
To: MNJohnnie
Having a radio was a BIG advantage. It meant that tanks could coordinate over a wide area, and also call in air and artillery support.
20
posted on
12/28/2015 11:07:53 AM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-168 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson