Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: miliantnutcase
The Panzer Mk iv had a crappy transmission that MTBF was measured in hours. The their credit Pz repair troops could swap a tranny in about an hour.

My bad the MK V had the lousy transmission. The Mk iv was a good platform, just under powered..

9 posted on 12/28/2015 10:48:51 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: central_va
The Mk iv was a good platform, just under powered..

I read an interview with a Sturmgeschutz crewman, he liked the late models III better than the IV. It was almost the same thing, but the IV was slower, and that mattered.

I'm tracking a guy in England that found the stripped, rusted, shot-out hulk of a Stg. III in the UK, and is completely reconditioning it. The transformation is stunning.

14 posted on 12/28/2015 10:56:43 AM PST by Riley (The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: central_va

panther had a crappy final drive design. rushed into production before being fully and completely “design verified and validated”

response to appearance to T-34 seems to be the reason for rushing design to production.

MTBF was about 60 hours...roughly.

classic example of design and engineering failure.

other than that, it was a fine tank.


79 posted on 12/28/2015 2:25:53 PM PST by QualityMan (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson