Posted on 12/04/2015 12:28:41 AM PST by fulltlt
YEah, we have hundreds of thousands of Muslims in this country who hate us and our way of life...this is factual.
And what is the response of the lazy good for nothing golfer in the WH? It’s to bypass Congress and sign executive orders to take our guns away.
The constitution is strong folks and will prevail against this tyranny.
False argument.
Firearm ownership is a right, but the firearms themselves are not a right. I still have to come up with the cash to purchase the quality and quantity of firearms that I want.
Healthcare is not a privilege. I don’t need any special permission from the government to see a doctor. I am free (at least before Obama’s death panels are in place) to purchase the quality and quantity of healthcare that I want.
When you stand before a death panel, you will realize that healthcare is indeed a privilege granted by the government.
“Meme” hahah. Buzzword of the year!
You have the right to defend yourself but the govt is not required to purchase a gun for you.
You have the right to free speech but the govt is not required to buy you a microphone or publish your speech.
You have the right to healthcare but the govt should not be required to purchase it for you.
There is something wrong with a person who thinks that others should be forced to provide their health care, and that people should not be able to protect themselves.
You beat me to it.
GTFO and don’t come back.
Your rights do not confer upon me an obligation to supply you with anything.
When you say that you have a right to healthcare you are saying that Government has an obligation to supply you with healthcare. In essence you are saying other citizens must supply you with healthcare because the government has no resources of its own. Government can not give you something unless it takes it from someone else.
Rights are in the US are freedoms from oppression by the government and are not guarantees of resources to be supplied by the government.
The right to own and carry a firearm is the natural extension of the right to live and the right to defend your own life from those that would unjustly take it. A firearm permits a weak man or woman to defend themselves against a strong man or several strong men. The right to do this is an obvious and natural fact.
To say that we do not have the right to defend our own lives is to say that we do not have a right to our lives. This is obviously false. So to say that we do not have the right to defend our lives with the most obviously efficient and effective weapon available is also obviously false. What other means is there available for a 90 pound woman to defend herself against a 240 pound man?
Many on the Left would like to have all kinds of rights: the right to be free from hunger, the right to free healthcare, the right to a free education and so on.
All of these rights are things that they want the government to supply to them for FREE.
All of these free things are anything but free. All of these things cost money that would have to be provided by imposing crushing taxes on the citizens of the nation. Besides imposing taxes, the people who provide these services would eventually see their wages cut because the government could only raise taxes so much before the political backlash became so great that the cost of the programs would have to be reduced. The obvious solution would be to cut wages.
Socialist utopias must eventually fail because desires of the people are never satisfied and the resources that can be taken by government are always limited. (Someday you will run out of other people’s money)
Does the individual have the God given right of defending one’s self and their family? If yes, then why does the government want to restrict or prevent the individual from exercising the right of self defense?
A- There’s something wrong with a government that thinks it can make your life decisions for you better than you can.
B- There’s something wrong with a government that thinks taking over the medical insurance industry constitutes healthcare and that taking away the right to defend one’s life constitutes protection.
C- There’s something wrong with a government that can take away your rights.
“There’s something wrong with a country that thinks that healthcare is a privilege. ....duh yea!
Gun rights keeps me out of health care and the bad guy in it.
The way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.
If a gun felt good shoved up your rear end, liberals would be pro-second amendment.
Molon Labe, mf’er.
Then you better leave.
Gun rights say you can own a gun for self protection if you want to purchase one. Obamacare is forced purchasing of good and services.
Gun rights are immaterial.
Health care as a right would be material and thus forcing or coercion of goods and services provided from one to another under goverment force and penalty. This is a form of institutionalized slavery for the “common good” vs. The private system where goods and services are voluntary under an organic market place.
Tell her gun rights advocates do not advocate taxing everyone to poverty so the goverment can forcibly buy a gun for everyone and make it illegal to not have a government gun.
American gun owners will make sure that gun grabbers no longer need health insurance.
Just post this video.
French citizens are disarmed. That really helped them prevent a terrorist attack.
I’m not asking the anyone to buy me a gun.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.