Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The speed of light is... slooooooow
Imgur ^

Posted on 11/02/2015 11:04:54 PM PST by LibWhacker



TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: light; speed; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2015 11:04:54 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Yeah, those of us that are science geeks know.

It is achingly slow.


2 posted on 11/02/2015 11:07:29 PM PST by Crazieman (Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman; LibWhacker
Speed of light simulator
3 posted on 11/02/2015 11:09:23 PM PST by Crazieman (Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Is this real time? It sure looks close...


4 posted on 11/02/2015 11:13:17 PM PST by djf ("It's not about being nice, it's about being competent!" - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

Nice graphic. Explains why Kirk’s ancestors needed to invent Warp Drive.


5 posted on 11/02/2015 11:14:56 PM PST by BobL ( (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'profile' page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Bah. Galileo, the first to seriously attempt to measure the speed of light in 1638 disagrees. And I quote:

"If not instantaneous, it is extraordinarily rapid."

6 posted on 11/02/2015 11:16:18 PM PST by FredZarguna (Eat pork: Annoy the UN.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

I blew it up a bit. Sometimes that affects the time needed for the gif. If it’s not 8 minutes and 18 seconds (the average), it’s wrong.


7 posted on 11/02/2015 11:16:25 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna

I guess it’s really demonstrating how big space is!


8 posted on 11/02/2015 11:17:30 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
You should have done it like this:


9 posted on 11/02/2015 11:19:11 PM PST by djf ("It's not about being nice, it's about being competent!" - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

But don’t get me wrong, you done good anyways!


10 posted on 11/02/2015 11:21:18 PM PST by djf ("It's not about being nice, it's about being competent!" - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: djf

Oh, that’s cool. Speed still seems to be the same, though, wrt the planets.

Didn’t know about width=100%, thx.


11 posted on 11/02/2015 11:26:00 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: djf

Oh, thank you, lol!


12 posted on 11/02/2015 11:26:48 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Certainly.
You are very welcome!


13 posted on 11/02/2015 11:28:08 PM PST by djf ("It's not about being nice, it's about being competent!" - Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker; All
Handy-Dandy guide to determining if someone understands how BIG space is.

Suggest we shoot our garbage in to the sun. If they balk at the sun reacting (rather than launch error), they have zero idea of the scale of space.
14 posted on 11/02/2015 11:30:52 PM PST by Crazieman (Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman; LibWhacker

But if you were traveling on a beam of light, distances would be shrunk to zero, and time would stand still. (According to the Theory of Relativity) Which means that you would be everywhere instantaneously. Or light is everywhere instantaneously. In that case the speed of light is infinite and the Universe is reduced to a point.

I have to say I have a hard time buying all that.

They say that God is omnipresent - Perhaps, then, God is traveling on a beam of light - or God is light?


15 posted on 11/02/2015 11:48:00 PM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

There was a young woman named Bright
Whose speed was much faster than light.
She set out one day
In a relative way,
And returned on the previous night.


16 posted on 11/02/2015 11:59:26 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

I have never bought the idea that time is equivalent to the speed of light. Simple visual observation does not equate time in my book. It is the same with audible. I see an explosion, but I don’t hear it yet.

I do, however get on a more fundamental level, the idea of “traveling faster” than the elemental forces that hold atoms together, which indeed seems to break laws and ideas.

I guess I have never delved in to the intricacies of time/electromagnetics on a macro/micro comparison.

Anyone else see my objection?


17 posted on 11/03/2015 12:13:52 AM PST by Crazieman (Article V or National Divorce. The only solutions now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
scale model of the solar system
18 posted on 11/03/2015 12:20:05 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper ("The poor" need prodding more than anything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

I see your objection, and raise you one bewilderment.


19 posted on 11/03/2015 12:48:34 AM PST by misanthrope (Liberalism; it is not unthinking ignorance, it is malignant evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
"But if you were traveling on a beam of light, distances would be shrunk to zero, and time would stand still. (According to the Theory of Relativity) Which means that you would be everywhere instantaneously. Or light is everywhere instantaneously. In that case the speed of light is infinite and the Universe is reduced to a point."

Not being a physicist nor playing one on TV, I have a problem with the whole Relativity time shift. Reading a lot of sci-fi in my youth from the masters, I still can't comprehend how moving away from Earth at light speed would result in the spacecraft having a different time differential to the Earth.

I don't believe time is an actual dimension, but a concept devised by humans on their white board math calculations. All the black hole and worm hole theories of bending time and space are just that - theories.

Not trying to be a flat-worlder, but no one has proven what a black hole is. If it's a imploded star that has so much gravity and won't allow light to escape, how can they even suppose what's beyond the Event Horizon? Movies like the recent, "Interstellar" tried in a convoluted way to make sense of black hole and how they could travel from one galaxy to the next. The premise was that humankind had learned in the far future that gravity is another dimension and created the black hole for mankind. Good movie, but non-sensical.

So I ask all the theory physicists what is time? Is it real or just a figment of human imagination? And if real, why can't space/time be bent to allow for travel backwards, which has never been the case or we would have seen it in our time? The movie above tried to explain it, but it was a movie.

20 posted on 11/03/2015 1:06:43 AM PST by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson