Liberals will not like the science, since it does not agree with their narrative......
To: Beave Meister
Oh, this science is not settled ...
2 posted on
10/19/2015 8:07:47 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(I've switched. Trump is my #1. He understands how to get things done. Cruz can be VP.)
To: Beave Meister
this is what happens when the news media listens to publicts that work for middle east country's like Saudi Arabia.
3 posted on
10/19/2015 8:09:12 PM PDT by
PCPOET7
To: Beave Meister
There are already a significant number of people who will always believe fracking is an environmental disaster.
Too many of our citizens lack discernment so once a narrative is put out there they will always believe the lie. For bonus points have Hollywood put out a few horrible movies blaming *insert your cause here* for natural disasters or illness and it’s a done deal. This stuff migrates into children’s television shows and books and the next generation can believe the wrong thing also (reinforced by educators).
4 posted on
10/19/2015 8:16:50 PM PDT by
volunbeer
To: Beave Meister
Well, it isn't any surprise to anyone who knows what the heck is going on.
For those who watched Gasland as their sole source of information, it might come as a surprise, though.
5 posted on
10/19/2015 8:19:09 PM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
To: Beave Meister
Environmentalists have long opposed fracking. One of frackings most vocal opponents, the Sierra Club, has claimed that fracking has contaminated the drinking water of hundreds of thousands of Americans despite contradictory research done by regulatory bodies, academics and even the EPA. A good communist never lets the truth get in the way of rhetoric.
6 posted on
10/19/2015 8:20:36 PM PDT by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
To: Beave Meister
I thought this was settled politics.
7 posted on
10/19/2015 8:21:58 PM PDT by
umgud
(v)
To: Beave Meister
Well - it is just one study.
I’m guessing the Sierra Club will be able to come up with a certain percentage of scientists that will say fracking of formations 8,000 feet deep contaminates groundwater at 200 feet deep.
8 posted on
10/19/2015 8:29:28 PM PDT by
21twelve
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
To: thackney
10 posted on
10/19/2015 9:16:32 PM PDT by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Beave Meister
I know an engineer who was with Baker Hughes and sat on fracking wells to be available should any computer system on any drilling device break down. He knows, at each well, how deep the well is and every chemical, etc., used in drilling those wells. He has told me fracking wells are so deep there is no way they can contaminate water wells.
He happens to be a freaking liberal and would be the first to scream bloody murder if drilling “threatened” the environment.
11 posted on
10/19/2015 9:29:18 PM PDT by
Marcella
(CRUZ (Prepping can save you life today.))
To: Beave Meister
About two years ago on “The Five” on FNC, Andrea Tantaros drank a clear wine glass full of fracking liquid to prove it was not harmful.
13 posted on
10/20/2015 2:50:38 AM PDT by
octex
To: Beave Meister
I could see them contradicting them but why are they contracting them?
14 posted on
10/20/2015 4:04:41 AM PDT by
pas
To: Beave Meister
15 posted on
10/20/2015 5:18:08 AM PDT by
bestintxas
(every time a RINO loses, a founding father gets his wings.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson