Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
To: JoeProBono
I guess if a bird dumps on someone’s head or ants bite them they have a case...
To: JoeProBono
3 posted on
10/14/2015 7:54:46 AM PDT by
Boogieman
To: JoeProBono
THAT'S the one I just found
So ... California, that won't let you bring a pansy in at the border that you got on Mother's Day at church allows widow makers to grow wherever and no police tape nor warning ?
4 posted on
10/14/2015 7:55:22 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: JoeProBono
I would prefer less substantial precipitation.
5 posted on
10/14/2015 7:57:13 AM PDT by
taxcontrol
( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
To: JoeProBono
The park has a responsibility to remove or remind of a dangerous condition. I hope he gets a bunch.
The damn tree is probably beyond its' time...and some idiotic tree hugger stopped it from being taken down.
To: JoeProBono
I started to read that and thought somebody was smoking crack. A 16 pound pine cone?!? Come on!
Learn something new every day!
8 posted on
10/14/2015 7:57:46 AM PDT by
Gamecock
(Preach the gospel daily, use words if necessary is like saying Feed the hungry use food if necessary)
To: JoeProBono
The stupid ... it burns. I feel bad for the guy, sure. But who do you sue when lightning strikes, or the wind blows, or a pine cone falls off a tree? This is dumb. What kind of lawyer agrees to represent this?
9 posted on
10/14/2015 7:57:55 AM PDT by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: JoeProBono
“The Araucaria bidwillii, native to Australia “ More damage from ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!
10 posted on
10/14/2015 7:58:03 AM PDT by
SubMareener
(Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
To: JoeProBono

"I think the whole thing's ridiculous!
Trees aren't responsible for the things they bear hitting people!"
11 posted on
10/14/2015 8:00:46 AM PDT by
ETL
(Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better and safer America)
To: JoeProBono
I just posted a site that shows a warning sign. I’m sure it would help in the lawsuit.
To: JoeProBono
Obviously the pine tree is racist and a homophobe too.
16 posted on
10/14/2015 8:05:02 AM PDT by
WKUHilltopper
(And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
To: JoeProBono
Perhaps he should sue the enviornmentalists for saving that tree!
17 posted on
10/14/2015 8:06:38 AM PDT by
rfreedom4u
(Rick Chollett for President!)
To: JoeProBono
In Hawaii, the cities trim coconuts off the trees.
Because stupid.
19 posted on
10/14/2015 8:09:19 AM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(We must first defeat RINOs before we can even encounter a Democrat to fight)
To: JoeProBono
Because, this was entirely avoidable by the City.
22 posted on
10/14/2015 8:10:58 AM PDT by
fwdude
(The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
To: JoeProBono
I feel sorry for the guy, but not everything in life that is bad is someone else’s liability.
23 posted on
10/14/2015 8:11:46 AM PDT by
DaveyB
(Live free or die!)
To: JoeProBono
Poorly written story. ‘Johnson’ is referred to only by that name, with no identification as to who he is or how he is tied to the story. You can click through to the story in the San Francisco paper to learn that it is Sam Johnson (apparently the UPI editor doesn’t even know how to cut and paste a name), the plaintiff’s attorney.
If attorney Johnson hasn’t done so, he might want to read the Federal Tort Claims Act and some of the cases under it. While it is possible that the agency has already denied the claim, it would be the unusual federal bureaucrat who could obtain approval for a denial that quickly (the agency has 6 months to determine the claim.) If the story can be relied upon, it also appears that he may have named too many defendants.
26 posted on
10/14/2015 8:14:11 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: JoeProBono
28 posted on
10/14/2015 8:16:23 AM PDT by
ETL
(Ted Cruz 2016!! -- For a better and safer America)
To: JoeProBono
Nature can be dangerous. There are some public parks in my area close to or in the hills where there are timber rattlesnakes. Although I've never heard of anyone in the area being bitten by one, it's possible. A wild bear ran through a park in the city a few years ago.
Should someone be able to sue the city because they got bit by a rattler or mauled by a wild bear? I don't think so. If you don't ever want to get hurt by nature, don't go out of your house.
34 posted on
10/14/2015 8:24:53 AM PDT by
driftless2
(For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
To: JoeProBono
Newton didnt sue
he studied. Perhaps this guy ought to study. I recommend starting with how to pick a napping spot.
38 posted on
10/14/2015 8:28:02 AM PDT by
al_c
(Obama's standing in the world has fallen so much that Kenya now claims he was born in America.)
To: JoeProBono
I have ordered copies of old ship blueprints from this place. How much do I get for a paper cut?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson