[Swordmaker]

You make yourself look like an idiot, it has NOTHING to do with "market trends", it is a technical bench mark showing that the iPhone 6S is TWO times faster than the closest speed Android phone on the market in sequentially storing data to internal memory.

Pardon me. . . that's the chart for sequential reads. . . The speed is about the same for sequential writes. They look the same. My apologies.

However, this quotation from the same source cuts through the fog, and shoots down freedumb's idiotic argument:

Overall, NAND performance is impressive, especially in sequential cases. Apple has integrated a mobile storage solution that I haven’t seen in any other device yet, and the results suggest that they’re ahead of just about every other OEM in the industry here by a significant amount.

[dayglored]

Sword, since you pinged me.... he’s just trolling you as usual, bog standard issue blather. I’d suggest you do something more productive and fun. :-)

[freedumb2003]

>>Overall, NAND performance is impressive, especially in sequential cases.<<

So it might be faster in doing in the current generation what the prior Android generation could do.

You aren’t understanding what I am saying, which is exactly what a cultist does.

Apple is now a trailing “me too” platform. It isn’t originating anything, it is copying what others (Android) did and then maybe making it faster.

But to the point of the article — you don’t see people lining up at midnight to get the latest Android phone which is a slightly better version of other phones.

Only cultists do that.

Just like having a tantrum when it is pointed out that all the Apple products are trailing technology, copying what is already on the market. I 100% guarantee no one buys an iPhone because it is faster (an arguable fact that) — they buy it because they drank the fanboy kool-aid.