>>Overall, NAND performance is impressive, especially in sequential cases.<<
So it might be faster in doing in the current generation what the prior Android generation could do.
You aren’t understanding what I am saying, which is exactly what a cultist does.
Apple is now a trailing “me too” platform. It isn’t originating anything, it is copying what others (Android) did and then maybe making it faster.
But to the point of the article — you don’t see people lining up at midnight to get the latest Android phone which is a slightly better version of other phones.
Only cultists do that.
Just like having a tantrum when it is pointed out that all the Apple products are trailing technology, copying what is already on the market. I 100% guarantee no one buys an iPhone because it is faster (an arguable fact that) — they buy it because they drank the fanboy kool-aid.
The Apple iPhone6 and 6S were BOTH, the last two generations, were faster than anything prior Android generations could produce. Your "catch up" meme is simply wrong. . . the Android's are the true followers.
Just because the geeks at Samsung, LG or all the other Android phone manufacturers may toss in a useless Blood Oximeter or Atmospheric Hygrometer sensor to their spec list which Apple chooses to exclude does not make them more advanced, it makes them desperate to have a spec list with more items on it.
But to the point of the article — you don’t see people lining up at midnight to get the latest Android phone which is a slightly better version of other phones.
Then you have no proof your Android phones are "slightly better" versions of other phones.
Google just released their latest and greatest phones yesterday. . . and I just don't see anything about them that is "slightly better" than anything.
Just like having a tantrum when it is pointed out that all the Apple products are trailing technology, copying what is already on the market. I 100% guarantee no one buys an iPhone because it is faster (an arguable fact that) — they buy it because they drank the fanboy kool-aid.
Except your claims are totally wrong. . . and you don't even recognize you've been hoist on your own petard. Your claim they are more expensive. WRONG. And that Apple is playing "catch up" is also WRONG. . . you've offered no evidence at all except your opinion. I've shown my evidence. . . which YOU mischaracterized as evidence of MARKET TRENDS. Still ROTFLMAO! You are a clown.
Do you consider the Roman Catholic Church a cult?
Any organisation who earns half the potential audience, that being somewhere around half a billion, isn’t a cult.
The real concern is the few who feel compelled to devote their time to stalking and harassing supporters. They’re usually psychos. Like you.