Skip to comments.
Firenado! 800,000 gallons of Jim Beam
Daily Mail ^
| 9/4/15
| Darren Boyle
Posted on 09/04/2015 12:29:03 PM PDT by Kartographer
A Jim Beam warehouse in Kentucky was struck by lightning releasing 800,000 gallons of bourbon into a nearby lake. Then, the lake was hit by a 'firenado' setting the inflammable liquid alight.
The firenado was caused when a bolt of lighting hit the ground setting a fire which was in the path of a tornado, which sucked up the flames, creating a terrifying spiraling inferno.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: firenado; jimbeam; kentucky; ky; oenology; zymurgy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
I think am going to cry!
To: Kartographer
THINK? I’m WEEPING OVER HERE!!!
To: Kartographer
3
posted on
09/04/2015 12:31:54 PM PDT
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: Dick Bachert
At least the fish died happy
4
posted on
09/04/2015 12:31:58 PM PDT
by
albie
To: Kartographer
Only one bottle was saved
To: Kartographer
6
posted on
09/04/2015 12:32:26 PM PDT
by
Quality_Not_Quantity
(Liars use facts when the truth doesn't suit their purposes.)
To: Kartographer
I usually only see sights like that after polishing off a pint of Jim Beam.
Good lawdy. I better get me some now...prices is gon' be goin' up fast.
7
posted on
09/04/2015 12:32:28 PM PDT
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Democracy is not freedom. Democracy is simply majoritarianism. It is incompatible with real freedom.)
To: Kartographer
8
posted on
09/04/2015 12:32:35 PM PDT
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: Kartographer
9
posted on
09/04/2015 12:33:02 PM PDT
by
dfwgator
To: Kartographer
10
posted on
09/04/2015 12:33:07 PM PDT
by
DaxtonBrown
(http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
To: Kartographer
What’s so sad is that all wildlife and forest destroyed were underage..
11
posted on
09/04/2015 12:34:06 PM PDT
by
BerniesFriend
(I am BerniesFriend, however it's really Bernadette, NOT Bernie Sanders friend!!!!!!!)
To: Kartographer
setting the inflammable liquid alight. Wait....what???
12
posted on
09/04/2015 12:34:06 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(I stand with Kim Davis! I will not comply!)
To: Kartographer
That heap big fire water Kemosabe.
13
posted on
09/04/2015 12:34:15 PM PDT
by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys-Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat-But they know what's best for you.)
To: Kartographer
14
posted on
09/04/2015 12:35:01 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
(If I'm ever accused of being a Christian, I'd like there to be enough evidence to convict me)
To: Las Vegas Ron
15
posted on
09/04/2015 12:40:13 PM PDT
by
knittnmom
(Save the earth! It's the only planet with chocolate!)
To: Kartographer
Now THIS is a genuine tragedy of National Importance!!!
16
posted on
09/04/2015 12:41:11 PM PDT
by
telstar12.5
(...always bring gunships to a gun fight...)
To: Kartographer
17
posted on
09/04/2015 12:41:17 PM PDT
by
BigEdLB
(We need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' on Iranian bombing runs. It is not vituous)
To: Kartographer
18
posted on
09/04/2015 12:41:27 PM PDT
by
cynwoody
To: Las Vegas Ron
Hmmm, interesting....learn something new every day here:
Flammable vs. inflammable
There is no difference in meaning between flammable and inflammable. Both describe things that are capable of burning or easy to ignite, but in all modern varieties of English, flammable is preferred.
Inflammable, derived from the verb inflame, is the original word. But because the first syllable is easily misinterpreted as the common negative prefix in- (as in, for example, inescapable, invulnerable, inorganic), the word has always caused confusion. Because this confusion can have dangerous real-world consequences, the shift from inflammable to flammable is welcome.
The less confusing flammable did not enter common use until the early 20th century, but it quickly became the prevalent spelling. Inflammable is still common on product labels and appears from time to time in edited publications, but it fell out of favor around 1970.
19
posted on
09/04/2015 12:41:32 PM PDT
by
Las Vegas Ron
(I stand with Kim Davis! I will not comply!)
To: Kartographer
20
posted on
09/04/2015 12:42:29 PM PDT
by
Cold Heat
(For Rent....call 1-555-tagline)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson